Systematic review

Abstract Traditionally, systematic reviews (SR) are descriptive secondary research, which may or may not be accompanied by statistical methods (metaanalysis) of pooling the results of primary, quantitative studies to answer a clinical question or test a hypothesis (Chalmers 1996). Similarly, qualitative primary studies can be pooled and synthesised in order to develop new theories to aid decision making, re-shape policies, and influence professional practices. Over the past 20 years, patient and

Systematic Review NUR/518 University of Phoenix Systematic Review The purpose of a systematic review is to attempt to find, evaluate and synthesize high quality research relevant to the research question. A systematic review uses carefully developed data collection and sampling procedures that are put in place in advance as a protocol. (Polit, 2012). A systematic review must contain the following: a clear inclusion and exclusion criteria, an explicit search strategy

CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND NARRATIVE REVIEW RELATED TO COMPUTERISED PHYSICIAN ORDER ENTRY SYSTEM The author of this paper is a nurse educator working in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) within the north-west region of England. For the purpose of this paper, the author has chosen a systematic review (SR) and a narrative review (NR) and aims to critically analyse these reviews using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool. The CASP tool has been developed by the Solutions

Introduction To evaluate and study the impact of telemedicine in health, a systematic literature review was conducted. An electronic research through the University of Maryland library was done the articles selected dated from 2000 to 2014. A total of 12 articles was reviewed that dealt with clinical outcomes, efficacy, patient and provider satisfaction. Telemedicine as an emerging field can greatly improve the outcomes of healthcare thus resulting in decrease the delivery cost of healthcare. While

criterion that distinguishes and characterizes systemic reviews from other narrative reviews is “being comprehensive “. That’s why developing an explicit and comprehensive search strategy is considered a must and an indispensable step of systematic reviews, failure to attain such step through searching all available channels of information is a potential threat to the validity of the systematic review. The information sources for systematic review comprise three main fold: • Academic bibliographic databases

Loucas, C. E., James, A., Hollis, C., Birchwood, M., & Kendall, T. (2015). Efficacy and safety of pharmacological and psychological interventions for the treatment of psychosis and schizophrenia in children, adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 10(2) doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117166 Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness and safety issues surrounding pharmacological and psychological interventions as treatments

programmes in ethics and its influence on ethical leadership and ethical behaviour, previous systematic reviews on these topics were searched. However, no review protocols were found. Consequently, to ensure transparency with this systematic review, an evidence-based checklist was used to guide this review’s methodology. Specifically, this review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement, designed by PROSPERO in order to organise

control, Punctures/*adverse effects, Sweetening Agents/*administration & dosage, Humans; Infant; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic. Inclusion criteria included infants < 1 year of age, publication dates: 2005-2016, randomized control trial, systematic review, USA, glucose/sucrose,

my secondary evidence as it is best to look for systematic reviews which is a form of secondary evidences. I used the advance search feature of the database. I performed the search using heart failure with quotation marks in the title section of articles. I also used quality of life and exercise in the abstract of possible articles as keywords. As well as this, I used the search engine’s function to only show results restricted to systematic reviews. Using these search criteria, I successfully chosen

Introduction The aim of this literature review is to gain an insight into either Ultrasound (US) or Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the more suitable imaging modality into diagnosing and assessing a tear within the knee Menisci. Both within trauma and non-trauma adult patients. This section of the review will explain the topic and reasoning into why it was done. The process of its relevance into radiography in practise will also be outlined. This will provide background into positive aspects