Voter Id Laws Essay

ethnicity. Within these laws, the American citizens can utilize their right to the voting system. The impact of voter ID laws is a contentious issue in the presidential election cycle. Though the Voter ID laws have been under the magnifying glass

Americans do not always convey a photo ID that meets government measures. Although states have felt that it is important to make strict voter ID laws requiring voters to carry a voter ID. Voter ID laws endeavor to battle a non-existent danger of voter misrepresentation. Federal Government should invest in a form of foundation for Social Security number to confirm and make sure there’s no fraud and it is easier for voters. Every vote counts. The 15th Amendment gives every citizen of the United States

Although not required by law, voting in the electoral process can be considered one of the greatest responsibilities of eligible Unite States citizens. Every eligible citizen has the right to vote but to actually participate in the democratic process fulfills this great responsibility. The electoral process must be accurate and fair to properly voice the will of the people to their elected officials. Many states have strengthened their voting laws to increase the integrity of the electoral process

license is a valid voter ID. While there are ethnic and social consequences to requiring a voter ID, the benefits outweigh those consequences; therefore, we should have voter ID that models the states with that are more lenient to the laws. The main argument against requiring voter ID is that some people cannot afford it, and those people mainly vote Democratic, creating a large gap in the voting numbers. Surprisingly 25% of blacks, and 16% of Hispanics do not have a photo ID compared to 9% whites

enforcing states to ID a citizen before being able to vote. The 15th amendment allows any citizen to vote no matter what race, color or previous condition of servitude. Also, the 19th amendment gave women the right to vote. With these amendments, they empower every citizen with the right to vote no matter any situation they are in. Yet, some states require voters to show photo ID to vote, for the sole purpose of preventing voter fraud. Only opponents of such voter ID laws argue that such laws disable the

been a rampant increase in the number of states requiring voter identification (ID) for elections. By 2004, approximately 19 states had made it mandatory that some form of identification would be required. As this trend has remained largely consistent, so has the rationale behind implementation of these laws from its proponents. Proponents of voter identification and registration laws argue that these laws are necessary to minimize voter fraud and restore public confidence in elections (Goldstein

instituted Federal oversight of elections in areas notorious for voter discrimination, was repeatedly renewed until 2013, when key parts were struck down by the Supreme Court. Because it limited the ability of a number of states to enact their own voting laws, removal of the Act has led to the institution of new laws requiring certain forms of identification at the polls. Although there are dissenting voices that vehemently protest voter ID laws as discriminatory, they are in reality a reasonable and efficient

extends back to 1950 which is when South Carolina first request that voters show some type of identifications document at the polls. Back then, no photo was required, they needed only any document that bear the voter’s name. After that, in 1970, Hawaii took on the same approach as South Caroline toward voting requirement. However, in all these states, they were still able to cast a regular ballot if they did not have the requested ID under some provisions (National Conference of State Legislature).

cast a ballot. Her failure to vote was not due to an oversight on her part; rather, it resulted from Tennessee’s new strict photo ID law that required voters to show a valid, current photo ID before casting a ballot in person (Brazile, 2011). Dorothy Cooper could not obtain a new photo ID, though she came well-in advance with her rent receipt, a copy of her lease, voter registration card, and birth certificate, simply because the name on her birth certificate differed from her current married name

Show An ID When Voting? Our Voting System is clearly being corrupted. Problems identifying legitimate voters is much more serious than anyone is acknowledging. With identity scams on the rise, states are getting tougher on the identification requirements needed to vote. In 2013, the Supreme Court ruled that a provision of the Voting Rights Act was unconstitutional and those counties and states previously subjected to these laws did not need approval to make changes to their voter ID laws. Eight states