I have attached an analysis for your review. This analysis reflects a comparison for Variable Cost and Absorption costing using
Sales: 60,000 units
Production: 80,000 units
Ending Inventory: 20,000 units
Based on these analyses I have made several recommendations along with pros and cons to aid in the decision-making process.
I recommend that we use absorption costing over variable costing. Absorption costing is a method where “…fixed manufacturing costs are inventoriable costs” (Datar, et al, 2009). That is, inventory “absorbs” all manufacturing costs. In the absorption metho there does not need to be a distinction between fixe and variable costs.
Per the analyses performed on the attached spreadsheets one can see that the
…show more content…
We should experience some of the following positives after implementing JIT:
Supply Chain Management: The JIT inventory model may assist in being more efficient in the way we handle supply chains and use our parts to assemble products. We can provide lower costs throughout the manufacturing process; which can be passed on to our customers. With our lower costs, we could produce a more affordable product for our customers and thereby help to stay ahead of our competitors.
Reduction of Waste: By maintaining our current method we are housing products that go unused and/or become obsolete. This causes us to sell product at a reduced price often less than cost or we must dump the product with no money gained at all. The JIT inventory model should help to address this situation and by housing fewer products in the warehouses we could address our customer needs quicker and be open to customized orders.
Reduction in Warehouse Costs: It can be costly to keep excess inventory on hand. By moving to JIT we may be able to reduce the number of warehouses we currently have as well as eliminate excess storage.
Improved Customer Relations: Adopting the JIT model will allow for better servicing of our customers. Having greater control of the manufacturing process will make it easier to respond to our customers’ needs and any changes they may have or require.
While I have high-lited the positives above we must also consider possible negative aspects.
•
The JIT approach to manufacturing involves timing the delivery of resources so that they arrive just when needed. Inventory optimization models help the firm determine how many of which items in which sizes should be delivered to each specific store during twice-weekly shipments, ensuring that each store is stocked with just what it needs. Trucks serve destinations that can be reached
Lastly, the just-in-time (JIT) approach is an operating philosophy that requires that all resources, including materials, personnel, and facilities, be acquired and used only as needed (Mazumder, 2007). The JIT approach works great for manufacturing companies because of their common classes of material that they use which are raw materials, work-in-process, and finished goods (Mazumber, 2007). According to JIT concept raw materials are received just in time to go into production, manufactured parts are completed just in time to be assembled into products, and products are completed just in time to be shipped to customers (Mazumber, 2007). The
a. After analyzing Pro-Forma Income Statement for all four quarter the utilization of Just-in-time strategy in Quarter 2-3 would have made Lean in Enterprises for more profitable. Since the premise of Just-in-time is to reduce waste and make sure that the supply chain is working efficiently to meet the customer demand. Just-in-time inventory is the minimum inventory necessary to keep a perfect system running. In Operation Management Heizer and Render define JIT inventory as the exact amount of the good arrives at the moment it is needed. (p. 2010) The ability to implement this strategy in Quarter 2 and Quarter 3 would have been very beneficial to the company expenses. The Just-In-Time strategy would have help the company avoid the $8,163 holding cost an excess capacity cost of $491,524. Just-in-time strategy would have prevented additional production after the product had low customer demand. Just-in-time would have also prevented the same waste
Using ABC also allows the company to use the Just in Time (JIT) system. This system allows ensures materials are purchased just in time to produce the products, and products are completed just in time for delivery. JIT uses the demand-pull system to receive the order, schedule production, delivered materials, and finished product delivered to the customer. This lessens the amount of excess parts and inventory saving the company money as well.
4) Exploring the possibility of implementing JIT (Just in Time) system that can reduce the finished goods inventory at
While the JITD program has many beneficial it also has its drawbacks. One of them is the perception that the power will be transferred to Barilla, as one of the distributors was quoted “we would be giving Barilla the power to push product into our warehouses just so Barilla can reduce its costs.” Another drawback is that some of the distributors are not comfortable or willing to share their warehouse data, which is a vital piece in order for JITD program to work. Furthermore, it might be hard for some retailers to report daily sales simply because they might not have the point-of-sale technology at their stores.
In order to build faith in the JITD program, both with our sales force and the distributors, we should run a pilot project with a single product line and a single distribution center. We will offer any necessary compensation to a distribution center in order to ensure full co-operation in this initiative. We expect that we will be able to increase service levels while reducing inventory levels. Once we are able to demonstrate the advantages of the JITD system, we will have a much easier time achieving buy-in with the other distribution channels.
Just In Time (JIT): A just in time approach maintains only required inventory in demand; it uses previous year’s statistics to dictate the amount of inventory to be kept on hand (Business.com). The benefits of a just in time approach are that it reduces inventory, shipping fees, depreciation, and doesn’t waste product.
* Because of a focus on cost reduction within hospitals, customers are now demanding JIT and/or stockless. By having materials delivered on an as-needed basis, they are able to reduce their inventory costs
As argued by Lubben (1988), JIT allows businesses to have better management since this ensures that there is no loss as there is sufficient number of clients requiring the equipment. This reduces her to deal with huge deliveries when the clients’ numbers are not increasing. (Lubben, 1988, p.4) also suggested the idea of JIT that “... major elements of manufacturing – capital, equipment and labour are made available only in the amount required and at the time required to do the job.” So it is a good practice by utilising JIT approach as it reduces wastes and ensure the correct amount of equipment is available (Lubben,
In this case, implementing the JITD program would allow Barilla Operations to take control of their own manufacturing process and be able to schedule which products are shipped out and control when they ship. The relationship between Barilla and their Distributors will improve as they will need to share information in order for them to achieve their goals. Barilla Operations will be able to improve their own planning procedures which would allow them to evenly distribute the workload on their manufacturing and logistics systems. They will be able to reduce any bottlenecks encountered in certain areas and run more efficiently without disruptions in supply. The ultimate goal is to reduce the costs within the supply chain.
JITD can lower the distribution cost, inventory cost and even the manufacturing costs. Distribution can be more efficient as the delivery is not based on the order from distributors. It is based on the forecast from Barilla. Barilla can better utilize and arrange the distribution team by planning a more efficient route and schedule to deliver the require product to each distributor on time. Barilla become more proactive in controlling the delivery schedule and so lower its distribution cost.
Being able to apply these methods to the hospital and surgery environment is a great example of how JIT can be used in non-manufacturing industries. When I think of everything that is needed from start to finish for a surgery and how important each of those items are, JIT is not something that immediately pops into my head. However, the more I think about it the more I see how JIT can be utilized as a valuable tool. Improving delivery times, reducing waste and defects, less inventory to store and track and less time spent on inspecting inventory received are perfect examples of why JIT should be used in this type of environment.
Many derivatives of the EOQ/EMQ appeared over the years, of which just-in-time (JIT) is one of them (e.g., Andriolo et al., 2014). In contrast to the classical EOQ/EMQ model, just-in-time (JIT) produces a product when needed and delivers it when wanted by customers. JIT considers inventory as a waste to be reduced by producing in smaller lots more frequently, so fewer items are in the pipeline (Bonney and Jaber, 2011). It also improves quality, productivity, responsiveness, machines availability, workforce flexibility, space and equipment utilization, flow, and relationship with suppliers (Cavinato, 1990; Jones, 1990; Mehra and Inman, 1992). JIT is based on continuous improvement of which reducing setup time (cost) is its primary driver (Zangwill, 1987; Jones, 1990;Cavinato, 1991). Readers are referred to
According to [5], Just-in-Time (JIT) inventory management enables an organization to gain competitive advantage by not having a large or excessive amount of inventory in warehouse. The organization only needs to order the parts when they are actually needed and new materials are produced only when old materials have finished. One advantage of adopting this strategy is that there will be no excess of inventory that needs to be stored and hence the inventory levels will be reduced as well as the cost of carrying and storing goods. One major disadvantage of this is that the organization will expose it in the risk of ordering problems for example a supplier is not able to provide parts on time. The result of this is that the organization cannot fulfill the order and contributes to customer dissatisfaction.