DECLASSIFIED 10 OCTER D:016
Proposing a Path to Peace
Kaku (Di) Islands Dispute
15 Der., D:014
Since the cusp of the Diplomatic Age a century ago, Ælfe-Ork relations have taken a turn for the worse. Two Ælfe-Ork wars humiliated the Ælves, resulting in loss of territory to a culture the
Ælves deemed derivative and inferior to their own. Part of that lost territory was the Kaku, or Di 1
Islands, largely barren landmasses significant for their strategic location between the two states, and the meaning they have come to hold in power relations between the Ælves and the Orks. Relations 2 between the two states have become even more strained in recent years, as increasingly vocal Orkish nationalists refuse to acknowledge the dispute, and express pride in the military aggression of the
Orkish Empire. As a corollary, the Orkish nationalists’ pride in past military conquests means to the
Ælves pride in the war crimes committed by Orkish soldiers at the Rape of Nan in D:37, and undermines efforts by Orkish Primorks since D:95 to convey regret and apologies for perceived injustices committed by the Orkish Empire 's military. In the D:90 's during the Ælves ' rise to 3 economic power, the Ælves responded to the ongoing dispute by deferring conflict in order to maintain equitable trade relations with the Orks, deescalating and preventing expression of anti-Ork, nationalist rhetoric. In D:014, with the Ælven economy in a more favorable position, the Ælves have responded 4 to tensions
In the Anglo-Saxon epic poem Beowulf, the stupendous hero’s many great deeds often appear to be for other’s benefit, yet Beowulf’s final conquest exposes his lust for glory and fame, thereby showing his lack of concern for anything else. This lust for immense glory and fame feeds his ego and causes his death and the imminent downfall of his great people the Geats.
Beowulf, the defender of Hrothgar and Heorot, exhibits far more complicated (and less sincere) shades of revenge than the Grendel’s mother. At the end of the day, Beowulf’s goal is to become the preeminent warrior in all the land. In his society, the only way to gain such widespread celebrity is through courageous and self-endangering acts. Beowulf masks these deeds with a façade of seeking revenge; he supposedly comes to Heorot to save the Danes from Grendel’s terror, but his true motives lie in becoming a hero. His reward is not the pride of doing a good deed; Beowulf is rewarded with lavish and expensive gifts.
Many people who read the poem Beowulf would probably find it hard to find similarities between the poem and life in modern America. How could one compare an ancient Anglo-Saxon culture with the sophisticated world that we are living in today? But, if we look closely, we may be able to pinpoint some parallel between the two societies. This essay will discuss the topics of warrior life, the “bad guy,” and social similarities. One might wonder how a warrior culture might be similar to our own? But if we consider American culture, we are actually still very war-like. We have a strong military system built to protect our country and the people that make it up. We are also known for going to the aid of other
While the author of Beowulf did not initially intend for the epic to become one of the most researched and foundational works in the English language, and therefore, did not go into much detail about its setting and surrounding political structures, the unnamed writer left behind important clues regarding Scandinavian and English political, economic, geographical, and societal bodies. Although not much is known about the author, it is evident through their writing, especially in the societal structure mentioned in the epic, that they were of English descent, specifically, born in the middle of seventh and end of tenth century England, according to Seamus Heaney in the introduction to his translation of Beowulf. Societal clues are the most prominent in proving this claim, as they merge Scandinavian and Old English structures, and at its most form, Beowulf is a Scandinavian tale told through an Englishman’s persepctive.
The rigid and confined society of the Danes also shaped the way its people think and act, but also influenced greatly on the writings. Given the fact that metaphors and kennings are common in Old English literature; the representation of “evil” is also something not to be taken on a literal level. “Edgetho had begun a bitter feud / Killing Hathlaf, a Wulfing warrior” (459-460), inter-tribal feuds, therefore, are also a destroyer of peace. Grendel takes on a form that is left uncertain; its real meaning hidden behind the metaphorical mask of a monster, is the never-ending battles between tribal armies (namely, the Danes, Geats, Frisians, and the Swedes) that had disturbed the tranquility people had longed for. It is almost a barrier of peacekeeping, hider of hope. Hence, it is represented by Grendel, a great evil hated by many, whom
Anglo-Saxon culture consisted of receiving fame, glory, and wealth through acts of vengeance and courage. “Beowulf” portrays these parts in great detail and shows how destabilizing it can be. Through acts of vengeance, a never ending war occurs.
Heardred’s mistake in offering hospitality to the sons of Ohthere results in him being “mortally rewarded with wounds from a sword” (2386). Onela’s treatment of Heardred’s hospitality as treachery results in a cruel parody of hospitable exchange: a fatal sequence of assault and revenge. The fate of Heardred also serves to reaffirm that hospitality in this poem can never wholly seal itself from treachery and peril. Later on, in his report to King Hygelac after returning to Geatland, Beowulf speaks of how Hrothgar attempts to make peace between the Danes and Heathobards by marrying his daughter Freawaru to Ingel. In spite of the feud between the two sides, the Heathobards are obliged to host and entertain the Danes since a Danish princess is marrying the Heathobard king. But as Beowulf mentions, “the spear / is prompt to retaliate when a prince is killed” (2029-30). Paradoxically, the system of reciprocity here becomes a source of both Heathobards’ hospitality (as host) as much as their desire to retaliate against the Danes. Ultimately, the force of grievances outweighs the bond established through the offering of the bride as a gift: a guest who wears the heirloom snatched from the host’s father has betrayed hospitality, which invites retaliation from the host. This suggests the limitations of hospitality as a principle of socio-economic
While today revenge is regarded as an impolite and impractical practice, in times past it was normalized, even celebrated. Kazuo Ishiguro’s The Buried Giant and the acclaimed Anglo-Saxon poem Beowulf describe vengeance as a ceremonious cornerstone of British, Saxon, Geat, and Danish society. In these societies partaking in revenge was widely regarded as noble and morally upright, though from a modern perspective these acts of vengeance would be regarded a petty and unjust. While characters in both The Buried Giant and Beowulf liberally practice and celebrate revenge, Ishiguro and Beowulf’s Anglo-Saxon author seem to critique the medium which their characters observe.
Given, the current high profile debate with regard to dating the epic poem Beowulf, it is quite surprising that some scholars go as far as placing it during the Vendel era around 550 - 793 CE. Even though it is considered as a kind of folk tale, many are those who believe it happened towards the early Vendel era. As a rebuttal to this point, it might be?convincingly argued?that this period is also referred to as the Germanic Iron Age. Moreover, this era saw the rise of Norse mythology, which is very fatalistic in nature; it focuses on a world coming to an end in a great cataclysm. Along with
Although the Senkaku/Diaoyu are uninhabited, they still play an important part of each nation’s economy; they are rich fishing grounds (fishermen have been known to frequent the area both in the Ming Dynasty and the present), and are close to trade routes and shipping lanes.
In the epic poem of Beowulf, written by an unknown monk in about 725 AD, the Anglo-Saxon virtue of comitatus is displayed as a slowly dying aspect of life. Comitatus is the basic idea that everyone protects the king at all costs even if it means a warrior giving up his own life, and if a king is killed, the warriors must avenge the death of the king or they can no longer serve as warriors for the next king. This value of comitatus is displayed mostly through the three battles that Beowulf encounters during the epic poem. An analysis of the three battles is important because Beowulf’s choice of weapons, behavior of the Thanes, and preparation for and attitude toward battle all emphasize the death of the Anglo-Saxon virtue of
In Beowulf, I believe that there is tension between the values of these warrior peoples and the suggested Christianity of the poet. In the beginning of the poem we become aware of the poet’s belief’s by their reference to the story from the Bible about Cain and Abel. As the story continues we have many examples of the tension between the how the Warrior people and the poet have two different responses to certain situations. For example, In lines 1008-1250 it tells the story of the war where the Danes fought the Frisians. During this war Hildeburh’s son and brother are killed. After a truce is made, revenge is then sought,“Then winter was gone, earth’s lap grew lovely, longing woke in the cooped-up exile for a voyage home— but more for vengeance…”
Killing for sport, and terrorizing others out of drunken courage or for approval from their king. It was a disaster and Grendel couldn't just sit back and watch any longer.
Lee and Daly’s essay “proposes the concept of universal female subordination, of "man the hunter," and "woman the nurturer" (30). It would be logical to assume that one explanation for the patriarchal society of Beowulf would be the warrior culture. Even in today’s culture, it is not common for women to be a soldier. Lee and Daly concede that “two parts are social inequality and militarism” (30). This may suggest that the positions of power that militarism often grants men creates social inequality.
The Anglo-Saxon heroes actively choose to suffer and face their wierd. However, their keeping of the allegiance enables them