A year in the south Essay

Before the war, Nathan Bedford Forrest was one of the wealthiest men in the south, he was a slave trader and he used slaves to grow and sell cotton. He started as a private in the Civil War, but soon after joining, his military prowess was recognized and over the course of the war, he rose to the rank of Lieutenant General. He was very talented, but ruthless, and he hated African Americans. After the battle of Fort Pillow, he ordered his men to massacre the African American

The prisoners saw him as a tyrant, while the south saw him as a hero. He was arrested for conspiring with high Confederate officials to “impair and injure the health and destroy the lives of Federal prisoners” and “murder in violation of the laws of war” Due to the poor economic condition in the South, the government could not afford to provide adequate necessities for the prisoners. Partly a victim of circumstance. He was only given a small amount of resources to work with. During the trail it was discovered that he to tried to save the prisoners on two accounts. In requesting for the Union command to reestablish the prisoner exchange program, he sent 5 pardoned prisoners with a petition signed by all their fellow inmates, however, General Grant refused. On another occasion he load up a train with 25,000 prisoners and sent them to Union held Jacksonville, Florida. However the Union command refused to accept them as well. His trail wasn’t fair and some evidence against him was fabricated entirely, he was a scapegoat. He was declared guilty and sentenced to be executed on November 10, 1865 in Washington, D.C. The night before the execution he was told by officials if he would implicate Jefferson Davis his life would be spared. He refused and said, “It wouldn’t be true.” Such a conspiracy between the Confederacy and Andersonville was never found to exist. At the execution the officer in charge said to him, “You

Imagine a historian, author of an award-winning dissertation and several books. He is an experienced lecturer and respected scholar; he is at the forefront of his field. His research methodology sets the bar for other academicians. He is so highly esteemed, in fact, that an article he has prepared is to be presented to and discussed by the United States’ oldest and largest society of professional historians. These are precisely the circumstances in which Ulrich B. Phillips wrote his 1928 essay, “The Central Theme of Southern History.” In this treatise he set forth a thesis which on its face is not revolutionary: that the cause behind which the South stood unified was not slavery, as such, but white supremacy. Over the course of

There is a upcoming war with France and we don’t know where it will be, so we will need to know about the New England, Middle, and Southern colonies. Based upon the areas of geography and climate, resources, political and social life, the Southern colony will prove to be problem in a possible war with France.

After the Civil War, the South was in a state of political turmoil, social chaos, and economic decline. Contrary to popular belief, Northerners did not subject Southerners to unethical or inhumane punishment. The time post Civil War was filled with efforts toward reconstructing the South, yet there is the strong question if there even is a New South. Yes, there was somewhat of a New South economically. No, there was not a New South regarding race relations and social hierarchy. In the 1870’s, the South realized the world still looked at them as the ones who wanted slavery. There was a need to project a new image to the world and to stimulate

Tensions between the North and South had grown steadily since the anti slavery movement in 1830. Several compromises between the North and South regarding slavery had been passed such as the Nebraska-Kansas and the Missouri act; but this did little to relieve the strain. The election of President Lincoln in 1861 proved to be the boiling point for the South, and secession followed. This eventually sparked the civil war; which was viewed differently by the North and the South. The Northern goal was to keep the Union intact while the Southern goal was to separate from the Union. Southern leaders gave convincing arguments to justify secession. Exploring documents from South Carolina’s secession ordinance and a speech from the Georgia

William W. Freehling's book The South vs. The South: How Anti-Confederate Southerners Shaped the Course of the Civil War tells a unique story about the Civil War and one that is not typically discussed in history books. The book is about divisions within the southern culture, which might have led to the outcome of the war in favor of the Union. Perhaps all black southerners had a vested interest in the North's victory, but many white southerners felt the same way for many reasons. In The South vs. The South, Freehling discusses the way the Union used divisions in the south as a war strategy, such as by recruiting potentially neutral Americans living in border states. Recruiting soldiers from border states and western states with less entrenched plantation cultures versus their Dixie counterparts was one of Lincoln's key strategies and also helped General Grant secure some key military victories.

Some states are currently threatening to leave the country because of the belief that the government has too much power over the people and the laws our country has to follow. In our society, we live by laws set by the government, and if any of them are broken, there is a punishment. These laws are set to make sure that the people of America are following the way things are ran so the country will not collapse. Although these laws are set for the safety of the people, sometimes when the government has that kind of power to make people follow certain things they should not have to follow, many issues arise. In the late 1800’s, many issues emerged between the South and the Union on whether the Southern states had the right to secede from the

Grant was from Georgetown, Ohio in his early years. Grant had many jobs that were like a firewood peddler, real estate salesman and a farmer. He was an opponent of slavery so he joined the war, he was the 21 Illinois volunteer. When Grant was in school he graduated 21 of 39 in his class. When Grant defeated some of the Confederates.Grant got promoted by Lincoln to lieutenant general and commanding general.

At the start of the war, a soldier named Fred Spooner writes to his brother, Henry, in Document 13.6. Immediately, throughout the North, there is much talk about the War, and nothing but. Spooner does not like the idea of war, but he hates the Southerners so much that he finds pleasure in thoughts of driving the South into the ground. Ending the spread of slavery, he

April 1865 was a month that could have disentangled the country. Rather, it spared it. Here Jay Winik offers a splendid new take a gander at the Civil War's last days that will always show signs of change the way we see the war's end and the country's fresh start. Exceptionally set inside the bigger range of history, loaded with rich profiles of outsize figures, new renegade grant, and a holding story, this is a magnificent record of the thirty most vital days in the life of the United States.

With Eli Whitney’s invention of the cotton gin in 1793, cotton became very profitable. This machine was able to reduce the time it took to separate seeds from the cotton. However, at the same time the increase in the number of plantations willing to move from other crops to cotton meant the greater need for a large amount of cheap labor, i.e. slaves. Thus, the southern economy became a one crop economy, depending on cotton and therefore on slavery. On the other hand, the northern economy was based more on industry than agriculture. In fact, the northern industries were purchasing the raw cotton and turning it into finished goods. This disparity between the two set up a

When reading The South vs. The South I come across the problem that the white Southerners had with the Republican wanting to free slaves. The problem persisted as the war continued. The view of white Southerners and Republicans which were led by the president Lincoln were different.

"When the war closed the river and after two hectic weeks in the Confederate Army, he went to Nevada with his brother, an abolitionist whom President Lincoln had appointed secretary to the territorial governor. And so, while the Civil War raged in the East, Samuel Clemens found himself searching the Wet for silver, and, soon his father, dreaming of a fortune (American Writers 193).

There are several issues in the “Tradition” reading that made me angry. For starter I’m an African American male who experiences the ugliness of Southern Tradition every day. It is my hope for the sake of America that people of all color and differences be treated with respect and dignity. With that being said, the one thing that was common in reading the stories was the unwillingness of the people of hate to change. I can’t for the life of me understand how someone who is no better than me as a human being can believe that they are above me I any capacity. This country was founded on the bases of protecting the rights of all men. As Thomas Jefferson stated, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they