preview

Abuse Of Power In Oleanna

Decent Essays

Oleanna, a play by David Mamet, is a drama play that focuses on two characters; John, a University Professor and Carol, one of his students that accuses him of sexual misconduct. Throughout the three acts of Oleanna, the developmental changes in each character leads to a gradual power shift from John to Carol. This can be seen through the John’s preset authority as a professor at the beginning, Carol’s gradual acquisition of the power by adjusting her behavior to John’s, and John’s inevitable downfall.
In Act 1, John’s higher status over Carol as is established. He condescendingly listens to her and interrupts her many questions with an expanded vocabulary which is barely understandable, especially not to Carol, whose vocabulary is very simplistic. …show more content…

This dialogue proves two things; the first being that Carol is not necessarily fighting to be heard and secondly, that John has absolute authority; with one word he is able to shut Carol up. In other parts of the play, one could say that, in a way, Carol allows him to take charge and uphold the authority by idolizing him. An example of this would be during a conversation John has on the phone, he uses the phrase “term of art” and when asked by Carol what it means he replies; “What is a ‘term of art’? It seems to mean a term, which has come, through its use, to mean something more specific than the words would, to someone not acquainted with them…indicate. That, I believe, is what a ‘term of art,’ would mean.” (Mamet 3). His explanation is very lengthy and unnecessarily wordy, he uses the words because he can, to demonstrate the academic authority he possesses over her as a professor. Carol, however, clings on to the part where he says that this is what he believes a ‘term of art’ means because she then questions him in a state of awe if he he actually knows what it means. This is where the audience can understand how originally Carol has put John on a pedestal and is in a state of disbelief at the possibility that her professor does not possess expertise in all areas; this contradicts everything she has thought about him in the past as a teacher. The idea that she apotheosizes him is exposed a …show more content…

Right off the bat, the viewer notices that Carol’s choice of clothing has changed. She is no longer wearing a loose jumper and long skirt, but rather a more professional-looking blazer. This ensemble eerily resembles John’s. As a University Professor, he chooses to wear a suit to project an aura of authority and even leadership, which is what Carol is trying to establish for herself by mimicking the way John dresses. In addition to that, Carol is no longer the soft-spoken, timid girl from Act 1, but rather it is she who is well-spoken and articulate. She becomes more assertive and interrupts her professor’s various rants with remarks of scrutiny. Towards the beginning, during one of his many rants, John uses the word “paradigm” to which Carol replies; “I don’t know what a paradigm is.” (Mamet 45) and when John tells her that it means “model” she replies, with a great deal of hostility; “Then why can’t you use that word?” (Mamet 45). In addition to that, John realizes that he is loosing control over the situation a little bit, so he tries to wheel Carol back in to being the naïve, soft-spoken girl she was in Act 1. After reading her letter of complaint, John sits down with her and puts on a show of great compassion saying “Now, I see I have angered you. I understand your anger at teachers. I was angry with mine. I felt hurt and humiliated by them. Which is one of the reasons that I went into education.”

Get Access