Academic Performance of 4ps Pupils

17. Put the following regions of the country in order from the highest poverty rate to the lowest poverty rate: Midwest, Northeast, South, and West.

This article focuses on statistics and actions (or lack of) in policies related to poverty. The topics that is discussed included who is the most likely to live in poverty and how it is measured. Also discussed in this article are the public policy response and poverty reduction. The articles credibility is high due to the type source which is academic. However, the reliability of the context in the article is questionable because of the lack of a strongly written argument. The statements appear to lack explanation on how they got their evidence,

requirement, they are living below the poverty level. This type of poverty is at an epidemic level

Poverty is an ongoing problem in Canada. Poverty is defined as the inability to obtain the necessities for life . Despite poverty being an ongoing problem, how to properly measure it is disputed among scholars. There are two basic formations for the measurement of poverty: the relative measurement and the absolute measurement. In Canada they are called the low income cut off, or LICO, measurement and the market basement measure, or MBM, measurement. The LICO measurement is individuated to Canada whereas the MBM measurement is a worldwide standard. Of the two the LICO measurement of poverty is most relevant for Canadian politicians. This because a relative measurement allows for policy makers to understand poverty based upon what it means

In looking at student to teacher ratio, the professional staff’s classes range in size from 22 through 28 students with around eight classes per grade level. Furthermore, the building’s academic standardized assessment scores had increased. Thus, they improved their PA School Performance Profile score to 62.6 out of 100.

The LIM (Low Income Measure) is closely associated with an individual’s health status and developmental outcomes. Additionally, the article notes that there should be further ways to measure poverty that emphasizes on social and material deprivation of poverty rates in groups such as those that are indigenous, racialized, immigrants and other marginalized divisions. The article states that LIMAT( low income

Over the years, the payments given by the government has been increased significantly to ensure that children can have a comfortable life with all the necessities they need. Now family allowances are approximately two hundred to three hundred dollars per child, the amount of

Statistics show that Canada's child poverty rate was higher in 2013 than in 1989, with 1,334,930 Canadian children (19%) living in poverty in 2013 (Khanna, et al, 2015, p. 3). Child poverty can affect any group, however, members of marginalized communities are often the most severely affected (Khanna et al, 2015, p. 3). The distribution of child poverty rates in Canada is attributable to many factors. The following description will focus on some of these main factors as they relate to the distribution of child poverty in Canada.

One study by Hajnal in 1995 showed that The spatial separation of the poor from the nonpoor in fact is more extensive in Canada than in the United States: The percentage of individuals living in areas of “concentrated urban poverty” (where the poverty rate exceeds 40%) is 2.7% in Canada, compared with only 1.6% in the United Sates (Fong & Shibuya, 2000, p. 450).

Measuring the amount of households currently receiving subsistence allowances and during the second year of an income increase, conduct another measurement of the households receiving government assistance. The reason for my design and method, is because some of the participants may not want to expose themselves to such a research, because they may feel humiliated by their livelihood. The method of the data analysis is to attempt to get at 100 participants from four regions in the country; the Northeast, Southeast, Midwest and West Coast. With the collected data from these regions, the questions can be answered though the responses. The responses can contribute to theory by providing evidence that increase in the minimum works or does not

amount of poverty in urban and suburban places. The official reports define poverty as a state

Canada measures poverty in three different ways: low income cut off (LICOs), market basket measurement (MBM) and low income measurement (LIM) (Chappell, 2014). The LICO

Clearly, we can see from the table that 11% of all households whose total amount of population was 1,837,000 lived in poverty. The proportion of poor single person with no children was 19% (population 54,000), whereas sole parent had 21% people (population 232,000) who lived in poverty. However, couple with no children had a 7% of population (population 211,000) living in poverty, whilst the proportion of poor couple with children who was poor account for 12% (933,000). In addition, there was 6% of single aged person who lived in poverty, whereas only 4% aged people (population 48,000) lived in poverty.

There are three components that must be looked at before carrying on. They are: poverty, social inequality, and relative depravation. Poverty is defined according to an economic standard. The income deemed necessary to meet basic

Hayati D. Et al., ( 2004) however recognizes that there is yet another group of researchers who think that both qualitative and quantitative approaches can be used simultaneously to answer a research question. For example, Poverty Measurement Index (PMI) is one such index. The PMI explicitly accommodates the multidimensionality of poverty. In the PMI construction process, poverty is viewed as a multidimensional and complex socio-economic state that relates to many aspects of household living.