preview

American Politics Essay examples

Good Essays

Due to the economic strife the American public knows all too well what a recession is. It is economic hardship that has led to the loss of thousands of jobs and businesses. This economic hardship has led to many people losing their homes, cars and other valuables. Why is it that when the Obama administration talks about the recession they refer to it as “The Bank Stabilization Plan.” (Stewart) Something that has caused the total meltdown of the American Economy being referred to as “The Bank Stabilization Plan” (Stewart) seems outright ludicrous. Even if they are in the process of fixing the problem, the government insists on using modest language to confuse the public into believing that the issue is not a huge problem; Just a …show more content…

Whether or not the war was being fought to “eliminate” terrorist, who are a threat to the United States and to “eliminate” “weapons of mass destruction” is unknown. After the 9/11 attacks many rumors were spread on the honesty and true reason behind the war. However they are all rumors, no facts were ever found to back them up. While “the war on terror” may seem like a very convincing term, the truth of the matter is that it is just another war. A war that is being fought in Iraq, where not everyone is a terrorist, where not everyone had something to do with the World Trade Center attacks. Thanks to the term “the war on terror” many Muslims, Afghans, and other races were immediately characterized as terrorist. This is a perfect example of “pretentious diction”, Bush used words such as “eliminate” to describe what they were supposedly going to be doing in Iraq. In the 9/11 attacks “weapons of mass destruction” were not even used, unless you can classify airplanes as weapons of mass destruction. Why should the public of the United States, be convinced that the people who organized this crude act, have accessibility to these so called weapons? Bush used pretentious diction to tip-toe around the subject and get is point across in a way that seemed to be in the public’s best interest. As if the term “war on

Get Access