Essay on An Explanation of Corporate Crime

What Kinds of Problems do White Collar and Corporate Crime Pose for Explanations of Criminality Until relatively recently, the concept of the criminal was that of a person who, somehow disadvantaged and disenfranchised from society, decided to ignore societal laws and concentrate on increasing his personal worth at the expense of society. The idea of the criminal as the outsider became an accepted part of criminological theory, so much so that almost all modern theories of criminology focus on

Outline and assess Marxist explanations of crime and deviance.   In looking at the Marxist explanation of crime and deviance one must also look to the non-sociologist explanations and those of other different groups in order to come to an informed view of the subject.   The non-sociologist definition of crime and deviance would be that deviance is uncommon behaviour, something that offends the morals or the majority of society, without being harmful or serious enough to be criminal. Whereas

Evaluate the usefulness of Marxist theory to our understanding of crime and deviance (40 marks) Synopticity - Crime & Deviance sociological theory Marxist explanations of crime and deviance, like their work on other areas like the family and education, rest on an economic and structural analysis of society that sees a class struggle between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. This struggle comprises the attempts by the proletariat to free themselves from the domination of the bourgeoisie

white-collar crimes In the modern society, the authority of police becomes more powerful and there are a lot of new laws issued to restrict personal behaviors, bringing a more peaceful community to the public. Indeed, the incidences of horrible crimes such as robbery, kidnapping and murder decrease, partially because of the better living condition. However, some other types of crimes emerge recently. These new crimes are endangering the fairness and operation of the society. White-collar crime is a new

Crime can occur on various platforms such as the streets of a neighborhood or at a corporation on Wall Street. As a result, crime and criminal behaviour can be explained using a broad set of theories presented by scholars with the focus ranging from the individual offender to the offender’s environment and external influences. White-collar crime coined by Edwin Sutherland, for example, is a crime committed by a person of respectability and high social status in the course of his occupation (Tatham

more precisely, corporations that have been engaged in corporate deviance causing severe harm such as Imperial Metals, and to demonstrate how the history of a corporation can relate to elite deviance. In order to accomplish the task at hand, I shall; firstly, define white-collar crime, secondly, describe corporate deviance. Thirdly, I will provide an explanation as to why corporate deviance goes unpunished, fourthly, discuss state-corporate crime, fifthly, depict an overview of Imperial Metals, and

assess Feminist explanations of the relationship between gender and crime. (50 marks) Gender is on the agenda” wrote Francis Heidensohn (1989) Feminist definition of crime is that “crime is politically informed and linked to particular interests”– of men. Before feminism, women were invisible in sociological research, this meant that explanations for female recidivism saw, female crime as a ’special case’ resulting from sexual promiscuity and biological deviance. Biological explanations for male criminality

White collar crime is a problem that we do not really see the full extent of; Geis and Stotland (1980) present the argument that the seriousness of victimisation caused by many corporations is much greater than that caused by common crimes however the public seem much less interested and concerned with white collar crime. Some traditional criminological theories have attempted to prove that white collar crime is not a different and separate phenomenon to common, every day crime. Robert Merton’s Strain

There is an undoubtable connection between crime and drugs, at least that is what we are made to believe. Majority of people would jump to say, drugs obviously are the source of crime. Yet, how do we know? In the early decades of America, drugs were very much legal to all people. Hundred years ago, there was a small handful amount of laws prohibiting the use of drugs. Companies were including it into their products [as an ingredient]. Physicians were prescribing it to their patients as treatment

interaction model of corporate governance, as well as a significant lack of concern for the fundamental wellbeing of some of its primary stakeholders. Arguably, however, even the shareholders themselves may ultimately be frustrated in realizing the maximum potential return on their investment in this company due to lost opportunities as a result of Company Q’s poor corporate citizenship and failures to achieve social responsibility. By closing two stores which happen to be in higher-crime-rate areas of