Sometimes there are events in our lives that we cannot control. These events occur, more or less, due to our own actions. Sometimes, however, we must come to terms with our inability to handle certain situations and also to reach our goals. These events are facts of life everyone: some people can't run as fast, or lift as much, or write as well. It is during these times that we must focus on what we can do well, and try to direct our goals around those features that make us good at something. In David Mamet's Oleanna, John loses his job and his house due to Carol's ignorance, lack of self-confidence, and overall inability to come to terms with her own short-comings as a student. This play epitomizes an act of complete degradation based …show more content…
John and Carol are having a conversation about various topics and John tries to get Carol to express some kind of opinion on the subject:
John: Well, let's address that. What do you think? Carol: I don't know. John: What do you think, though? (pause) Carol: I don't know.
That exchange of dialogue on page 29 sums up Carol's lack of self-confidence. She won't even take the plunge, and try to talk about a subject brought up in class. John tries to get her to give an opinion on a subject that carol obviously doesn't understand, in an attempt to help her comprehend. Carol doesn't believe that she has any ability, or else she would have at least tried to answer his question, a question that isn't hard in and of itself to understand--What do you think? Other examples of her total lack of self-confidence can be found earlier in the play: "…and I walk around. From morning 'til night: with this one thought in my head. I'm stupid (12)." What kind of person thinks of themselves as stupid, all the time? Carol obviously has no confidence in her abilities to do anything, and she feels that everyone around her thinks she's stupid as well. On the very next page even, Carol accuses John of calling her stupid. She is so deliberate in her belief that she takes what John says out of context, and turns it into an insult against her. Carol
In “The Yellow Wallpaper” the main character is constantly being told what she is and is not able to do such as “But he said I wasn’t able to go, nor able to stand it after I got there;… (Gilman)” This is an excellent example of her feeling oppressed, because her husband feels that he knows her capabilities better than she does. Another example of this is “’What is it little girl?’ he said. ‘Don’t go walking about like that—you’ll get cold.’ (Gilman)” This is an example of John thinking that her condition is so bad, she has to be treated like a child, constantly telling her what and what not to do. In “The Story of an Hour” the shows she has felt depressed with “There would be no one to live for during those coming years; she would live for herself. (Chopin)” After receiving news that her husband passed away in a train accident, she felt as if the burden of doing things for her husband was lifted, and that she could do the things she wants to do.
"Experience, which destroys innocence, also leads one back to it" (Baldwin). All experiences spring out of innocence. Sarah Orne Jewett expresses this through the story “The White Heron.” She uses the story to show how easily innocence can be influenced. "For Jewett, it seems to have been a personal 'myth' that expressed her own experience and the experience of other women in the nineteenth century who had similar gifts, aspirations, and choices" (Griffith). Her personal experiences include her living in Maine with her dad and two sisters. She had a medical degree but turned to writing because of poor health. She represented many women during the hard times of the 19th century.
Carol has a weak personality and what stands out is that she doesn’t even know who she is herself. Carol’s character seems so lost and hopeless throughout the entire film. When her husband or doctor talk to her, she often times is hesitant when she speaks. She never gives a definite answer and there is a lack of confidence in her voice. The theme of the movie is what is wrong with Carol?
No matter how hard they try, there are some people who cannot get ahead in life. Walter Lee Younger is a man who is frustrated with his current position in life, and every disappointment he has encountered thus far. Although he tries to be a loving man, sometimes he does not know how to show the idea of love, "Sometimes...sometimes...I don't even know how to try" (Hansberry 89). His position in life can be regarded as symbolic of every black male struggling to provide for his family by any means necessary. Although Walter has a job, it seems inadequate for his survival. As a result, he has become frustrated and lacks good judgement. Throughout this play Walter searches for the key ingredient that will make his life blissful. His
When the dialogue appears in the story its style of avoiding what needs to be said is part of the repetition with Marie or the narrator changing the subject whenever the reality of Carol’s illness comes to light. When Marie starts to describe her new reality that acknowledges the illness such as talking about her new friend at the institution Marie tactfully manages to avoid the situation by changing the topic to their pre-illness reality by mentioning that “Mrs. Smith asked after you” (154). This is repeated again when a harsher reality of Carol not taking her medication comes to light. Instead of facing the reality that she is not getting better they instead change the subject by asking “‘What’s the girl like that is in the room with you?’” (155). In this instance, they want to preserve their new found reality again by avoiding what needs to be said or acknowledging that they do not fit into reality. Then again, when Carol mentions getting a cottage with her inheritance instead of coming to terms with her illness, they skip acknowledging the question by answering “that’s a good idea” (156). They refuse again to discuss that this is not a rational way to deal with her issues and instead give into her fantasy by not acknowledging its faults. Throughout these repetitive conversations, nothing of substance is ever talked about as that might disrupt their reality as they refuse to acknowledge or discuss what needs to be
Everyone is born into this world with a sense of innocence, completely oblivious to the cruelties of the world. However, as humans grow up and reach early- adulthood, they begin to realize the realities of this world, all that is real and all that is, in fact, a figment of the imagination. As people learn that it is truly impossible to stay hidden from the harsh realities of adulthood for their entire life, they also learn that it is impossible to shield others from these truths as well. They learn that although they may not be able to protect themselves from life’s misfortunes, they must perceiver, move forward, and not hold anyone back in their tracks. Just as all humans eventually learn to accept and move past life’s various misfortunes,
Themes in literary works are central, recurring ideas or messages that allow us to understand more deeply about the characters. It is a perception about life or human nature that is often shared with the reader. In The Catcher in the Rye, there are several themes that can be found in the words and actions of the narrator, Holden Caulfield. The dominating theme in this novel is the preservation of innocence, especially of children. We can see this throughout the novel, as Holden strives to preserve innocence in himself and others.
The playwright was trying to get quite a few messages when he created this play. First of all, I believe he was trying to show social change and the power and potential that an individual has inside of them, despite their circumstances. I think that this play/movie reveals the true messiness of life and how with the right mindset, you can make it through anything you
In A Separate Peace, John Knowles carries the theme of the inevitable loss of innocence throughout the entire novel. Several characters in the novel sustain both positive and negative changes, resulting from the change of the peaceful summer sessions at Devon to the reality of World War II. While some characters embrace their development through their loss of innocence, others are at war with themselves trying to preserve that innocence.
In today’s society the criminal justice system that we live in is flawed in so many ways. Some say that it works while others go to prison or jail for crimes that they didn’t commit. In this paper I will be covering specific examples from the book, The Innocent Man, where the defendant’s rights were violated. John Grisham talks about innocent men being innocent and convicted for murder and sent to unlawful court proceedings. In this paper I will be focusing mainly on the violations of his 6th amendment. The 6th amendment is the right to effective assistance of counsel.
The Age of Innocence, written by Edith Wharton in 1920, is a novel about Newland Archer, set in New York in the 1870s. In the beginning of the novel, Newland is engaged to May Welland, however when her cousin Ellen Olenska returns from Europe, he begins to doubt who he really loves. Due to societal norms, Newland stays with May and never consummates his relationship with Ellen, despite their growing feelings towards each other. At the time of writing The Age of Innocence, Wharton was reading Sir James George Frazer’s The Golden Bough (1914), a 14 volume work on anthropology, which consisted of myths, customs, and magical practices. This collection sparked interest for Wharton, potentially inspiring her to enlist many allusions to classical
The title “To Kill A Mockingbird” is taken from a quote in the book, where Atticus says "Shoot all the blue jays you want, if you can hit 'em, but remember it's a sin to kill a mockingbird." (lee Later, Miss Maudie Atkinson states that "Mockingbirds don't do one thing but make music for us to enjoy." (p.177). This shows that mocking birds are innocent, and that is why Atticus strongly forbids his children to kill them. To Kill a Mockingbird novels theme is how prejudice affects the town of maycomb,alabama. Also, the mockingbird symbolizes innocence. All the birds do is sing for you and give you pleasure in what is natural and enjoyment to them (singing for you). Theydont harm,. They are fragile,loveable, weak, and helpless birds. In the
Therefore, with John mentioning a solution to Carol to be, “Your grade for the whole term is an A. If you will come back and meet with me…” defeats the purpose of a teacher as John is not inferring that he will teach her to achieve a better grade. This supports the critical statement, “John fails Carol as a teacher and his arrogant insensitivity towards her jeopardises his apparently successful marriage to Grace.” This is because; to an extent John involves his personal life with Carol by having conversations with his wife whilst being on the phone. Also, with the removal of teaching for Carol’s grade, she can question whether John is fulfilling the profession of a professor. Therefore, it jeopardises his marriage with Grace as Carol sees John as a threat by trying to overpower her. Subsequently, this means that there is an alternative perspectives in viewing Carol as vulnerable and villainy in betraying her teacher. The American Dream can also link as to why Carol betrays John; this is because the concept of the American Dream is that everyone has the opportunity to be successful. However Carol and her group see John as being a barrier to her being successful with him as her professor as they view him as a manipulative sexist man who adores the power. Similarly, Posner betrays Irwin after coming across as vulnerable as he’s viewed as an outsider in the classroom and therefore tries to please Irwin so that Irwin will start to appeal to
In Christine Macleod’s essay, “The Politics of Gender, Language and Hierarchy in Mamet’s Oleanna”, she uses an approach that differs from the common belief by critics that David Mamet comments about political correctness in his play titled, “Oleanna”. Through the analysis of the play along with numerous sources, Macleod argues her idea that the spectators of the play seem to dwell on the antagonist’s – Carol’s – advantage over the protagonist, John, as a result of her gender. In fact, Macleod argues that it is Carol’s struggle for power that truly highlights her in a negative light and is the true engagement within the play. Despite holding a viewpoint which deeply contrasts the standard belief by viewers that Mamet’s “Oleanna” deals with gender, Christine Macleod proves with solid arguments in her essay that David Mamet calls for more attention to hierarchy and language, and uses other factors as an addition to the plot which simply blurs everything else; this is evidently a flawed statement as Macleod fails to realize her
Gender roles and the different way men and women speak appear in many different types of media, literature, and even in real life. For example, in the first act of the play Oleanna by David Mamet, these kinds of gender positions are magnified. Oleanna is a play about a woman named Carol, who is used to getting good grades. She receives a failing grade and she goes to speak to her professor, John, about it during office hours. The play demonstrates a struggle for power between the two characters and at some parts, the roles for gender are unusually switched.