Case Study 1.2 “Geoffrey B. Small is Big on Quality, Customers, Community” is about a leading fashion designer that does not want his customers to think about the brand name, color, style or price of the fabrics they wear. Small’s wants his customers to be “thinking about the quality and origins of the fabrics you wear, their impact on the environment, and your own view of social responsibility as a customer.” Even if the customer cannot afford his clothing he wants them to understand his mission as a designer. Small is based in Italy, first selling his jeans at GAP in Boston. He wants his Customers to realize how much they are actually spending on cheap clothing. People who buy cheap clothes are actually spending more money because the …show more content…
The large corporations might learn that his different marketing tactics work and draw in more customers.
The utility that Small provides for his customers is the fact that this clothing will last for so many years. This allows the customers to save their money. They will not longer have to go buy new clothes as often. The high price reflects another good thing about Small’s clothes, the fabric will be environment friendly and will not fade or shrink like the cheaper clothing items. The price creates the highest quality clothing. He makes it easy for customers to buy from his brand again.
The era of marketing history that best matches the marketing philosophy created by Small is the relationship era. The relationship era focuses on developing long-term valued relationship with customers. In the text it says, “Small views his relationship with his customers as critical to his success, referring to them as the ‘best and only financial backers’ a designer should have.” That’s proof that the relationship marketing technique works.
Social causes that impact the customer relationships would be that Small is trying to make things environmental friendly. Its important to people that the environment is protected as much as possible. It might sound odd that a clothing designer can help the environment but the fabrics used are important. Some fashion designers will use fur for example and they receive
Around the globe, you see billions of stores, and as you go to a mall or outlet, there are some stores that are affordable such as H&M or Forever 21, and others are extravagant such as Gucci or Louis Vuitton. It is impossible to imagine how many stores you see every day passing by and think, why are there so many different stores, but most of them produce the same idea of selling clothing? But some stores land between those accessible and expensive such as, for example, Old Navy. How Old Navy got its name from the San Francisco parent company GAP and was an “Immediate hit when introduced in 1994” (Samano). Old Navy is a typical family some people likes to shop and known and seen as a friendly store that sells appealing clothing and stylish tends. Old Navy is a store owned by GAP Inc., which is the type of clothing for the families since shows toddlers, young teens, and adults; however; this relates to the American culture of must-have clothes and keeps up with the trends of nowadays.
Admittedly, more and more brands and retailers are taking action to respond to the ethical and sustainable issues. From the consumer side, there is an apparent growth of ethical purchase. Kate Spade, as an American luxury fashion brand, undergoes ethical enhancements of its manufacturing process in Africa. However, instead of transforming this approach into a charitable purpose, Kate Spade chooses to retain its high-quality standard and beautiful products to attract customers . This report will first focus on the elements Kate Spade practically supports in Africa, then review the performances of their program, using a comparable retailer’s moral action as a comparison. We will eventually conclude by examining the positive and negative impacts of such a policy for Kate Spade.
This papers purpose is to teach fashion heavy consumers on the real price of fast fashion and how buying it affects the environment. This type of audience can be anyone who partakes in the buying of well-known cheap retail stores that have a large audience of being fast and obtainable. These consumers should have the information on how fast fashion effects are environment so it could possibly alter their buying habits to be eco-friendlier but buying either less or more sustainable clothing instead of the cheap alternatives. This audience should care about this purpose because this will affect the world now and for future generations as their environment is being mistreated because of these fast
As with many businesses that are born from the entrepreneur 's necessity to respond to a personal need, Big Skinny has the problem of identifying its target market and an effective way to connect with it. Past customers have been individuals inclined to a healthier lifestyle, who enthusiastically embraced the idea of a thinner and lighter wallet. Studies have shown that heavier wallets can in fact lead to back problems and sciatica. Another key feature of Big Skinny was its nylon microfiber constitution, which made it durable and water-resistant. More recent designs have accommodated the needs of more stylish customers, adopting leather exteriors and making the company versatile (see Exhibit 2).
In the firms purchasing strategy, Ross Dress for Less obtains high-quality close-out products resulting from errors of judgment, overproduction, miscalculations, canceled orders and liquidation. The products are purchased in large quantities allowing the company to access them at rock-bottom prices (Bischoff, 2011). The company has to apply cost leadership to keep competitive rivalry at bay.
Credibility statement: A university of Georgia professor gave an hour-long ted talk talking about her experiences of working and traveling to different countries seeing the fast fashion industry at first hands. She now teaches about fashion sustainability and the cycles of the fast fashion market.
Fashion is everything to society and the media. The fashion industry has transformed into a necessity in the life of people. Everyone wants to look good, feel fabulous and feel as if we belong with everyone else. The envy and desire to wear certain things and look a certain way all come, from wearing the latest fashion handbags, accessories, dresses, shoes, and the list goes on. But, when is considering fashion into an individual’s life going too far to the extreme? Many do not consider the whereabouts of fashion materials and how the environment is affected by the mere existence of certain garments. Some may believe these objects grow on trees. But that is clearly not the case. Even though it would be nice. The fashion industry as a
Of the hundreds of named brand clothing that form part of the retail and fashion industry I chose to compare, for my analysis, Abercrombie & Fitch, Forever 21, American Eagle, and H&M. These stores are prominent, well-known for selling apparel, shoes, and accessories by the means of offering sales and promotions to their customers. This is a clever strategy for attracting customers, allowing them to believe that they bought goods at affordable, convenient prices – and not to mention the prestigious name prescribed to the clothing brands. Using keyhole.co as my main source, I obtained relevant and valuable information regarding the status of these brands. My intentions were to compare a period of 14 days, however, due to the limited access that I received from my free trial, the program only allowed me to see fewer of the dates than I anticipated. I want to take this opportunity and mention ahead of time that due to the various and distinctive products that are sold from these stores, when looking for the “spending capacity” I decided to focus on shirts/ jeans for men and women and compare the prices among them since each of these retailers carry those items and as a way to make this report easier to contrast and comprehend. Also, when approaching the section of “setting”, I screen-shotted some of the images on Instagram and made them into a collage to separate the type of clothes and trends that each of these brands sell currently. In the following modules
Although the market for separates is certainly viable given promising growth in test markets, it is not a market that makes sense for Hart, Schaffner & Marx (HSM) to compete in. The trend certainly shows a divergence in how some customers view their needs with regards to semi-formal clothing, but the firm runs the risk of diluting not only the perceived quality of its clothing, but also alienating its current client base that is partial to the experience HSM offers in its stores. This experience includes personalized expertise on new fashions, custom tailoring, and the status associated with purchasing and wearing the company’s clothes.
2. Richard M. Johns (2006). The Apparel Industry. 2nd ed. UK, London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.. 1-124.
This essay reflects on the lecture titled Creative Economy by Martin Bouette. I found this lecture relevant to my final project. My topic is the changing trends in the apparel industry. How Corporate Social Responsibility affects the supply chain, going local from global, vertical from horizontal. The lecture is relevant in many aspects, for example the knowledge society's changes and ethical issues and responsibility within the apparel industry.
In today’s society, fashion rules the teen and young adult generations. Billions of dollars are spent each year on designer brands such as Gucci, Louis Vuitton, and Off-White. At the same time that these large amounts of money are being spent of materialistic aspects of fashion, people in third world countries are struggling greatly. Instead of money being spent on expensive clothing, it could serve a greater purpose by being donated to countries who are in dire need. Absurd amounts of money in first world countries are spent on designer brands, while third world countries struggle to even get their hands on any clothing.
There are a large amount of social and environmental problems within the global apparel industry.
They buy large volume of garments direct from the manufacturer; they have very few middle man and efficient logistics.
Levi’s in the comfort business. Not just mean physical comfort but providing psychological comfort – the feeling of security that, when you enter a room of strangers or even work colleagues, you are attired within the brand of acceptability. Although what a consumer defines as psychological comfort may vary from sub-segment to sub segment. The key phrase here is that last one, ‘from sub-segment to sub-segment’. In its attempts to be sensitive to the various fluctuations of taste among the denim-wearing public, Levi’s has diversified its brand by creating a wide range of jean styles.