Analysis Of Into The Wild By Jon Mccandless

Krakauer Jon Krakauer blatantly argues that Chris McCandless wasn’t stupid, tragic or inconsiderate in his decisions. Due to the scrutinization and criticism surrounding Chris McCandless, Krakauer uses different examples of individuals who explored, the wild, and did not survive, as well as his own personal experience, to defend McCandless and his actions. In chapter nine, Krakauer underlines his authority and sets himself up to refute McCandless’s detractors. He then establishes familiarity with seperate American men who ventured into the wilderness and did not make it out. The adventurers that are sampled are: Gene Rosellini, John Waterman, and Carl McCunn.

McCandless went into the Alaskan wild carrying only a .22 caliber rifle, a ten pound pack of rice, some necessary tools and utensils and a pair of boots. He underestimated the Alaskan

​Throughout his adventure, McCandless proves his bravery by supplying himself with an insufficient amount of supplies and making treacherous decisions. McCandless embarks on his route alone with no money or car, only the items that mean the most to him. In order to focus mainly on the nature and his surroundings, McCandless “put a match to” (Krakauer, 29) all his money and “wasn’t carrying anywhere

Jon Krakauer, the author of the book, Into the Wild only know about Chris McCandless is an explorer traveling to Alaska search for himself reborn. However he isn’t exactly what he really is, but an ignorant, foolish, selfish, and misunderstanding of the world in which he lives. These words that have been used to describe him are based on the idea that he went on a journey to the Alaskan wilderness to seek his own revelation, but not having a firm grasp of reality, he senselessly died a stubborn man, the people mention that he was unprepared to go into the wilderness, didn’t listen to a more experienced person, broken several of state laws, abandoned his family and loved ones, and followed a dream that never existed. Personally believed he is an ignorant fool, selfish, and misunderstand man that throws his life away for nothing but despair.

First of all, Christopher McCandless was not prepared for life in Alaska. If Christopher did more planning for his trip, then he would have had a better chance at surviving. It is believed that, “By design McCandless came into the country with insufficient provisions, and he lacked certain pieces of equipment deemed essential by many Alaskans: a large-calibre rifle, map and compass, an ax” (Krakauer 180). Christopher did not bring any of the needed supplies with him to Alaska. If he did more research on Alaska then he would know it is not easy to survive without the basic essentials. He was naive and believed he could live off the land. Christopher should have found out that even the most experienced of people have trouble surviving in Alaska. Even if they had all the supplies. People who prepared for Alaska have a better chance of survival. Jon Krakauer is an example of somebody that was prepared for Alaska. He states in his book that “Unlike McCandless, however, I have in my backpack a 1:63,360-scale topographic map (that is, a map on which one inch represents one mile). Exquisitely detailed, it indicates that half a mile downstream, in the throat of the canyon, is a gauging station” ( Krakauer 173). He explains that he brought a map that helped him find a way across the water safely. If Christopher was better prepared and he brought a map it could have saved his life. He could not make it across safely so he headed back to the bus. He would not have had the opportunity to eat bad seeds ( believed to be what killed him) if he knew a way across.

(41) Though he possessed natural talent in many areas such as business, music, and sports, Chris had “little patience for learning the finer points” of any activity. This lack of patience applied to Chris’ survival skills as well. Before his Alaska adventure, Chris McCandless had spent the last two years after graduation traveling around and taking temporary jobs. On of his trips, Chris decided to take a canoe trip from America down into the Gulf of California and almost drowned when a storm came up.” (5) For nearly a month, McCandless subsisted on nothing but five pounds of rice and what marine life he could pull from the sea, an experience that would later convince him he could survive on similarly meager rations in the Alaska bush.” (36) Chris naively believed that the experience in Mexico and his travels in South Dakota and West Coast had taught him the “full repertoire of crucial skills”

He underestimates the terrain and climate, and, “…came into the country with insufficient provisions, and he lacked certain pieces of equipment deemed essential by many Alaskans…” (180 Krakauer). Chris lacked the necessities, so it made his survival rate drop. Information is key in the wilderness, which, “not only did McCandless die because he was stupid, one Alaskan correspondent observed, but ‘the scope of his self-styled adventure was so small as to a ring pathetic-squatting in a wrecked bus a few miles out of Healy, potting jays and squirrels, mistaking a caribou for a moose (pretty hard to do)…only one word for the guy: incompetent’” (177 Krakauer). Chris lacked the knowledge needed to survive the Alaskan frontier, which dropped his survival rate.

In the summer of 1990, Christopher McCandless dropped off of the face of the earth. McCandless ended all contact with his family, told no one where he was going, changed his name, and abandoned all ties to his previous life. There have been many disputes as to why McCandless chose to embark on his adventure. Based on the information presented in Jon Krakauer's novel, Into the Wild, it seems that Chris McCandless’s ultimately unsuccessful journey was spurred by his desire to escape his emotional baggage and monetary stress from his life in Virginia.

Is it worth to give up your lifestyle and force yourself to live a different one? Some people are willing to quit their own lifestyles to live a whole new different life. In the story “Into the Wild” Chris McCandless was running from his family because of all the drama that he had to face growing up. He even left Washington D.C to move to Alaska, he did this because he was very fond of nature. In the book “Into the Wild” the Author Jon Krakauer explains how Chris McCandless was able to sacrifice his life in order to live a life in the wilderness. A lot of people wouldn’t want to do this because people wouldn’t to want to be willing to give up their own lifestyle in order to start a new one from scratch. It’s not worth it to lose your own lifestyle because it could also result into you losing your life as well.

In the summer of 1992 Christopher McCandless was found by a group of hikers dead on Stampede trail in Fairbanks 142. After college Chris had left society donating his life savings to charity, burning the remainder of his money, left all his belongings in his 1982 Datsun B210, and presented himself as Alex. This was the beginning of Chris’s journey into the wild. He has met a lot of people along the way and they all were devastated to hear that Chris had died in Alaska from starvation. Chris was a well liked person by the people that he spoke to. A troubled childhood fueled his fire and gave him every reason to dislike his parents for what they had done to his only sister and himself as children. In Jon Krakauer’s book, Into the Wild, he uses ethos and logos in order to compare and contrast others experiences to Chris McCandless so that

After hearing his story, people are quick to conclude that Christopher McCandless was egotistical and overconfident. Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer tells the story of Chris, who was on the search for greater meaning in life. He spanned all across the west coast Although, he walked into the wilderness with limited supplies, he was able to survive for a substantial amount of time before he died. People also blame is inexperience in the Alaskan wild. Additionally, he died due to the mistake he made of eating potato seeds instead of his confidence. From the evidence presented in the book, the reader is able to conclude that Chris’s confidence did not ultimately end his life.

Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild is incredibly engaging, captivating, and intriguing. Krakauer conveys an explanation and depiction of the journey of Chris McCandless as he ventures out into the wild with minimal resources, and abandoning almost all ties related to his childhood. Krakauer successfully illustrates the journey with powerful use of diction, structure, and ethos. Although Krakauer created a riveting piece, he tends to be repetitive and confusing information. Overall, he beautifully created a piece that will inspire you to take action towards your wishes.

Anyone who had sense would have spent some time learning about what they were getting themselves into, but not McCandless. Alaskan park ranger, Peter Christian, doesn’t believe that Chris McCandless was a hero in any sense of the word. In an essay Christian wrote about McCandless, he says, “First off, he spent very little time learning how to actually live in the wild. He arrived at the Stampede Trail without even a map of the area” (1). Christian goes on to list even more of the ways to see that McCandless had little to no information on where he was going, but it does not take an Alaskan park ranger to see that Chris did not know what he was doing. Anyone who reads the book can easily see that this situation had Chris in way over his head. Chris made many devastating mistakes in the wild that led to his death; man of these mistakes could have been avoided had he done some general research on basic survival skills needed for the brutal Alaskan tundra. One of the things that showed his lack of knowledge was the moose he killed. During his time in the wild, McCandless was fortunate enough to kill a moose; sadly, it did not benefit him in any way. He did not know how to keep the meat edible and the meat of the moose rotted away before McCandless could reap many of the benefits of his kill. Had McCandless done some research, he would have known how to preserve the meat of the moose so that he could take advantage of moose’s meat for a longer period of

Jon Krakauer wrote a biography, Into The Wild (1996), describing a man’s, Chris McCandless, life before and during his journey to Alaska to be able to discover himself and a new life while leaving his family with worry and pain. Jon Krakauer has demonstrated Chris’s relationship with his family, like his father who he did not get along with and his sister who he adored so much, and how he left his family without warning or ever contacting them during his journey. Chris McCandless has always been around money and a caring family that he wanted to see the reality of the real world where money is not in it or the importance of his family. He supports his claim by describing McCandless’s journey while meeting new people and experiencing new things

Into the wild essay Nope, Alexander Supertramp is crazy. In John Krakauer's novel Into the Wild the main character Chris McCandless aka Alexander Supertramp leaves all he has behind including family and his promising future to wander across country, with little to no supplies, only to end up dead in the Alaskan wilderness, barely two years after he vanished to live out his fantasies about living of the land and being a transcendentalist for the rest of his life. Krakauer stated that he had a bias towards Chris and that he admired Chris for his undertaking and the courage Krakauer believed it took to go on this journey. The idea that wandering into the Alaskan wilderness with a bag of rice and a rifle and expect to survive there without anything prior training or knowledge of the land else is absurd. Chris Mccandless was not brave or courageous, he was a confused person that did not know what he wanted that let the stories of Jack London and Leo Tolstoy influence his decision to live off the land and completely disappear from society.