preview

Analysis Of Nancy Mairs Living Under Circe's Spell

Good Essays

When you see a disabled person, what goes through your mind? I tend to not pay too much attention or put too much thought into it, but I really should. Being disabled is hard and changes people's lives dramatically. We can see how Nancy Mairs life has changed in her essay “On Being a Cripple”, and in Matthew Soyster’s essay “Living Under Circe’s Spell”. Both authors are victims of a disease called multiple sclerosis, which damages nerve fibers and interrupts the nerves’ signals. Soyster writes with a more helpless tone that evokes pity and Mairs takes on a humorous and strong tone, making her seem very capable and strong. They both have different styles of writing and use a variety of rhetorical devices to add on their essay's effectiveness. …show more content…

Soyster is “too young and vital to be this helpless”(1). The reader feels bad for Soyster because although he is young, he is disabled and has to rely on other people. While Soyster is laying on the ground, he writes about how anybody could come by and hurt him. This makes the reader feel even worse for Soyster because he would be completely defenseless in a situation like that. He is at the mercy of others and people do not like that feeling, which allows the reader to connect to Soyster even though the reader might not be disabled. Soyster adds to his pathos by letting the reader know “he lived for and through [his] legs” and that we was “a marathon runner…, a cyclist and a skier” (1), which meant he used his legs alot. By letting the reader know that he was very active with his legs makes the reader pity him because something really important for him was taken away. Although most people haven’t “lost” their legs, they have lost many other things, which give the reader a chance to relate to the author in the sense of losing something important. Mairs uses appeals to pathos by listing the many activities she cannot do anymore because of MS, such as “picnics, dinner parties, poetry readings,...[picking] up babies, [playing] the piano, [braiding] [her] hair”(2). Although these are not essential things that people do every day, the reader still feels bad for her because she …show more content…

Soyster and Mairs both have very different ending to their essays. Soyster ends his with one word: “Waiting”(2). This describes him waiting on the ground until somebody comes by to help him; it describes a moment where he is helpless. He ends with this to show how MS has affected him and left him weak. On the other hand, Mairs end with a paragraph in which she asks herself many questions. She shows how strong she is by writing “I’d take a cure; I just don’t need one”(5). This line is very powerful for because it tells the reader that she can fight through MS and still live her life. When a friend asks Mairs is she ever thinks “Why me, Lord?”(5), she responds with a no. This takes the reader by surprise because most people would ask the question “Why me?”. Mairs not asking this shows that she has come to terms with her disease and is looking forward. She is ready to live her life instead of pitying herself. The last line of Mairs’ essay is a question asking “What in [her] life would [she] give up in exchange for sound limbs and a thrilling rush of energy?”, where she promptly responds with “No one. Nothing”(5). Mairs shows that she is able to live with MS and is happy with her life now. This is a huge surprise to the reader because anyone would give something up, but Mairs shows she is strong enough to not have

Get Access