Analysis Of ' The Games '

In Richard Connell’s short story “The Most Dangerous Game”, the protagonist character, Sander Rainsford is an adventurous and fearless big game hunter. Rainsford has no remorse for his prey. Over the course of the story Rainsford experiences a sudden change of heart when he finds himself where “The world is made up of two classes—the hunters and the huntees.”

With New York Times bestselling author Thomas C. Foster has introduced literary devices to help annotate and understand deep thinking when reading. Likewise, Richard Connell’s short story “The Most Dangerous Game” has examples of statements made by Foster on literature. The short story is about a hunter goes through the perspective of someone being hunted. Remarkably, literary devices provided by Thomas C. Foster accompanied a different understanding of the short story, The Most Dangerous Game.

2. “Hunting? Good God, General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder”( Connell 158). This is a strong warn. That indicates the so-called hunting is murder.

Richard Connell’s The Most Dangerous explains multiple theories, such as nature versus nurture, and survival of the fittest. This short story also seems to have an underlying theme of Social Darwinism (Of Two Classes). Throughout the entirety of the short story, Connell shows a character change of a main character, Rainsford, who is at a constant battle with General Zaroff, the antagonist. This character change shows the importance of the mindset of characters, and how it can be applied to everyday life.

In the story The Most Dangerous Game one conflict is man vs nature. Rainsford is fighting nature because he is on a ship and he came across an island. Rainsford falls overboard and has to swim for safety. “All he knew was that he was safe from his enemy, the sea and the other was weariness on him”. In order to survive rainsford hast to swim to the island and find shelter. In the conflict man vs nature this shows Rainsford bravery.

How would it feel to suddenly go from being the hunter to becoming the prey? That is exactly what happened to Rainsford, one of the main characters in The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell. Rainsford was a big game hunter who accidentally fell of of his yacht. He swam to a nearby island, and there he met General Zaroff, a cruel man who hunts humans for sport. In exchange for release from the island, Rainsford agrees to be hunted by Zaroff. Consequently, Rainsford is a survivor because he kills Zaroff and wins the game. Rainsford is also a survivor because he demonstrates the qualities that a person must have to be considered a survivor. Although Rainsford is a survivor, Zaroff is not. To be considered a survivor, a person must go through a traumatic or life-threatening experience but still demonstrate resilience and determination.

I will be comparing the video verion of The Most Dangerous Game to the story.

Imagine being on an island, with no laws, no society, just the need to survive. When a normal hunter is going to Rio to hunt, the story takes a wild turn and ends up inverted, with the hunter becoming the prey. This is the plot of Richard Connell's short story, ”The Most Dangerous Game”, this short story was unique and interesting to most readers because of the series of unfortunate events. In “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, man vs. man, along with man vs. self can lead to an unexpected resolution.

As said in the movie Surviving the Game. These are rules Rainsford has to follow or he will die. Richard Correll wrote “ The Most Dangerous Games” which is about a man who loves to hunt humans not animals. Rainsford is on an island and he does not know what to do and then goes to General Zaroff. The general loves to hunt people it is like a sport to him and ask Rainsford if he wanted to join him and he said no. Rainsford has to win a battle if he does not win Zaroff will kill him or if he does win he can go back home said general Zaroff he said I will find you a way home. Richard Correll uses mood/ tone in his story “ The Most Dangerous Games” to convey the theme of competition enhances a person’s character.

People are like onions; they have several layers and consist of a bitter core. In consideration of this reality of human nature and reality of a man-made society, “The Most Dangerous Game”, written by Richard Connell, reveals these dangers. It unveils the truth about blood lusting hunters and defines the meaning of civilization. In the story, just like in the real world, so-called rules and laws are made to suppress and dignify human savageness. Here, Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff are two essential characters—capable of virtuous actions, yet prone to decisions that reflect immoral tendencies, and so; a message is conveyed: without the practice of morals and consequences, corruption of man is inevitable.

When you watch the movie High Noon, and read the story "Most Dangerous Game" you may not see many similarities and difference when you first read, or watch. But you might start to put the puzzle together when you watch a second time to think about what's the same, and different about the two. Some of the main similarities and differences are, in both stories the main characters are outnumber by their enemies. In High Noon, four bad guys coming to town to take their revenge on Will Kane. In "The Most Dangerous Game" Rainsford is hunted by Ivan, general Zaroff, and his pack of dogs. Another similarity I spotted was when both characters needed help the most there was either no one there to help them, or there was no one brave enough to help them. And my last one is a similarity and a

In “The Dangerous Game,” Rainsford is stuck on an island known as “ship-trap island,” after falling off his yacht, and is met by a ruthless, hunter who murders for sport. In High Noon, The newly married Will Kane is scares by the news that Frank Miller is coming back to town. He sent him to jail for murderer, but now, him and his gang are back for revenge. Although the film High Noon and the short story, “The Dangerous Game” have many differences like conflicts, there are a lot of similarities like setting and characters.

In Richard Connell’s short story “The Most Dangerous Game,” physical strength, intelligence, and instincts are necessary for survival.These three skills are necessary for Rainsford to make it out alive. Rainsford, a big game hunter, must show that he has what it takes to survive when he suddenly goes from the hunter to the hunted. He needs to outsmart General Zaroff in order to live. Rainsford uses physical strength, intelligence, and instincts to make it through the hunt alive.

The differences between the story and the movie “Most Dangerous Game” are that the characters were different.. The setting was also different and everything was explained. In the early part of the story it begins with a guy named Rainsford who was riding in a boat. A fellow traveler was on the boat with him and they were having a conversation. They were talking about the island they passed by. The island was dressed in unfounded rumors. Noises Rainsford heard were odd that night. He got up out his bed and went to check them and he accidently falls overboard. He was not able to climb back on the boat. In 1932, RKO released a movie of the story titled the same “Most Dangerous Game”.

In “The Most Dangerous Game,” there are quite a few indicators that establish that the story may be considered pop culture literature. In the first scene the reader is already being told about the dreadful island, Whitney comments to Rainsford that the island is called the “Ship-Trap Island” (Connell). Whitney also comments to Rainsford “Sailors have a curious dread of the place” (Connell). Connell uses the opening scene to set the tone of the story, at this point the reader knows nothing about the characters but only about a daunting island. This is an example of pop culture literature because Connell is focused on the plot structure more than the actual characters of the story.