College athletes should be being paid for the work they do. First, being an athlete takes up all of that person’s day, combining it with being a full-time student as well as all of the athlete's days are taken up either going to class or going to practice. When an athlete has this sort of schedule it is hard to find them a job to work at to pay for college. College athletes do have scholarships, but “A full Division 1 scholarship is $25,000 per year.” (Huffingtonpost) is not enough when you add in all students needs like housing, food, clothing, entertainment, books, and the fees for just being in a class. The scholarship money suddenly disappears. When athletes are under this timeline they can not work so they need to earn money somehow, mom and dad are not always there to help you out. …show more content…
Secondly, There are other reasons schools can pay athletes. People against this may say, with what money will these student athletes get paid? March Madness a basketball tournament between college teams made a deal for “ $11 billion for three weekends of television per year” (ESPN). This is where the money can come from. There is plenty of money going around to pay college athletes even a minuscule amount of money the schools pay coaches or make deals with companies when the athletes are the ones doing the work. Lastly, schools do not have to pay every athlete the same amount of
One reason for this is that there are many obstacles that evolve once we start paying college athletes. An example of one of these obstacles would be that not all institutions would have the financial capabilities that big name schools such as Clemson, Oklahoma, as well as USC. Furthermore, how would schools such as Indiana State, Marshall, or Western Michigan be able to provide equal salaries to their players in comparison to Top 25 teams? (Reed, 2016). Another obstacle would be paying all NCAA athletes, it is no doubt that football and basketball generate much more revenue than sports such as swimming, golf, as well as baseball. The only way to solve that would be creating a national plan that all institutions and sports would have to follow. The Huffington Post made an argument and posted a possible solution by stating, “let athletes benefit from their fame and likeness”, and “If the local auto parts store wants to pay a college athlete to sign autographs for two hours during a store sale, why shouldn’t the athlete be allowed to take that opportunity?” (Reed, 2016). The article also went on and made the comparison between coach and athlete. NCAA coaches are allowed to accept endorsement money, therefore that should not differentiate when it comes to the coaches’ athletes. Another argument that The Huffington Post made was that, “Music students in college are free to accept cash or gifts for playing a weekend gig at the local club. What makes athletes different?” (Reed, 2016). The purpose of this argument being made is that students involved in activities other than those sports connected to the NCAA are allowed to profit from their skills and talents while athletes are
Imagine this you wake up at 7:45 am Monday morning so that you can make it to work (in this case practice) by 8:30 am you start your day with demanding labor. That ends around 1:30pm after you head to the weight room for an hour and a half to better yourself. You’ve trained your body now it is time to train your mind so you study for 2 hours. Your day began at 7:45 so you’re exhausted you decide to grab some dinner and go to bed. This is the routine college athletes go through every day and that is not accounting for their schooling. Let’s face it there is no time for work in that already packed schedule, so how do college athletes get money to survive. They can’t work, many come from rough backgrounds, and nobody cares, which is not acceptable when you look at the amount of money college athletes bring to their respective universities. Big time college athletes deserve to be paid in compensation for their time and abilities that they give to colleges. When you look at the capital that is generated from division 1 sports there is room to pay the athletes something to help them get through college.
Since the rise of popularity in college sports gave way over the past fifty-sixty years fans of college sports and the athletes have been debating over whether or not the college athletes should be getting paid for playing or not. This debate really started when colleges and other business started making money off of college sports, for instance college basketball which makes a billion dollars a year and since then players and fans have been asking why they weren’t getting a piece of the pie. Since then the topic was soon split into two groups those who are for players getting paid and those who are not for players getting paid this debate has been going on for many years now and is not only a topic that fans
The question has been tosses around for a while now. Why should college athletes be paid? They should be paid only if the college can afford it. What this means is that if a division three college can only afford to supply scholarships to athletes that’s fine, but the problem comes in when division one colleges make millions and millions of dollars along with the NCAA while athletes only get scholarships around $40,000 dollars. Another example of inequality is that coaches not just colleges can be made multimillionaires within one season of coaching. One example of that is University of Kentucky Coach John Calipari.
Finally, the most important reason college athletes should not be paid because they receive a free education for playing for the university or college. “College athletes receive numerous amenities and luxuries free of charge” (Post Column 1). The athletes are students sustaining entry to a college education through their involvement in sports, which means they earn scholarships that pay for their bills; living space, committee, and other authorized payments. “Paying college athletes would diminish all the goals and morals that colleges and universities stand for” (Post Column 1). College sports is not an occupation or vocation.
As college in the U.S. gets more expensive on year to year basis, it seems to become more of need or a necessity for a student to get a good job. It almost as if colleges or the higher education system as a whole is taking advantage of students by constantly raising their tuition. At some universities there tuition has risen to nearly a quarter-million dollars for a four year education. College tuition has gone up 945 percent since 1980. It is almost impossible for the average day to day, four year college student to not come out of school without any type of debt at all. It is to the point now where the only people who do come out of college without any debt, are college athletes and the top tier of the students in their high school class,
College athletics are a part of everyone’s lives in some form whether it be watching ones favorite team or cheering on friends and family members. This is especially true in the US. These college athletes are taken for granted while they are playing this sport at a competitive level and also maintaining the academic qualifications required because many don’t understand or realize the time and effort these athletes put into their career. Therefore, college athletes should be paid for playing sports during their college career.
Division 1 sports have increased monstrously among Americans in the course of recent decades. Division 1 college athletes should be paid because players are giving up their bodies for their school, it will keep more players in school, and to ensure an equal distribution of the revenue that the players bring to the school. This has expanded incomes for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and the participating universities which has fueled the level headed discussion of whether school competitors ought to be paid past their athletic grants. In the course of recent decades, Division 1 sports have increased tremendously in the United States. Regardless of whether it be football, basketball, or hockey, etc. as far back as the start of the century, college athletics have gotten an overflow of income to their separate universities, and additionally enhancing the college's notoriety. For instance, in a review led by the Orlando Sentinel, it was evaluated that the University of Texas' Athletic Program had the most astounding income of some other University at
College athletes are some of the most hard working people ever and don’t even get paid for all the work they put in for the sport they are playing. There are many reasons why college athletes should have an annual income but are not being paid even though it would help them out a lot. College athletes should be paid for playing sports because it is time consuming, dedication to the sport, and will help pay for college and other essentials. Student athletes spend more time playing/practicing sports and schooling than the regular job which is 40 hours per a week.
College sports are a big thing in America. Almost every student goes to college after high-school. In high-school most athletes play more than one sport. They play football, basketball and run track or play baseball as well. After the students get done with high-school they move over to college. College sports are way different than high-school sports. Athletes spend more time on college sports than they did on high-school sports. In College they play just one sport, not like in high-school where they play many different sports. College athletes spend about 40 hours per week on their sport and they also have to manage the academic part of college. That means college students are really busy during their season. Most of the time college athletes are there on a scholarship, which means that they don’t have to pay quite as much as normal students. So the athletes basically played sports so they don’t have to pay too much for college. Most college athletes don’t think a scholarship is enough, and therefore should be paid to play college sports because they don’t have time to work, the risks to get injured are high, it is not afforced for some students.
In today’s society money is everything. The common consensus is that the more money you have the better the you life is. Greed makes the world go round. Nowhere is this more prominent or obvious than in the world of sports. In fact one of the main problem with college sports, specifically the NCAA, today is that athletes are not getting an education, thus when they inevitably stop playing sports they often don’t fare so well in the real world. And why are they not getting educated? Money of course.
College athletes should get paid because it will help keep the college athletes to finish their education; their performance, efforts, and dedication deserve more compensation.
College is a stimulating time for students, and all the madness begins before the semester even starts. Time is spent gathering books, reading the required material before starting the class, rummaging through the stores for school supplies, getting your apartment/dorm set up, working to pay for life, and much, much more. But, being in college is a altered world for college athletes. Their time in college is devoted to learning but equally devoted to the sport they play. A student athlete doesn’t have time for a job, puts their body on the line every day, and doesn’t have any extra time. College sports bring in billions of dollars each year through marketing, broadcast contracts, ticket sales and merchandising so, why aren’t college athletes receiving a salary?
The athletes are already getting paid enough not just in tuition. They get the best gyms to workout in, free health insurance for injuries, transportation, food and they get free uniforms & equipment for their sport. So why do athletes need to get paid money if college students/ college student athletes have bad money hobbits like spending their too money too quickly. Paying the athletes will make the problem worse the athlete will just spend money faster and quicker then he already is. Students barely put themselves on a budget just imagine a college athlete getting paid in cash. Now while they are some good reason while athlete should not get paid there are some flaws with their argument. By paying the student athlete money the coaches will
Many people go to work for an average of 40 hours a week to earn money to provide for themselves and their families, but many jobs are going with any payment in return. College athletes spend 50 hours a week practicing their sports, according to Nocera. This equates to more than a full time job. Many athletes see their sport as a job, an unpaid job. College athletes should be paid for playing sports at their universities. Many universities get high amount of revenue from sports, for example the profit from football is in the millions. Some colleges even accommodate 40 million in football earnings, but none of these revenues are given to the football players. Furthermore, many college athletes have tougher lives than those in the professional