What went wrong in Picking Cotton? During the 60 minutes about picking Cotton, I can say that no one did anything wrong based on the time frame it happened. Overall for me revising it, I can say that one of the issues I came across was the degree of being sure during the photo line up. When the detective asked Jennifer if she is sure after she picked up cotton, I think there should have been more open to that question. “How sure are you?” I think they should use open-ended type of interview to ask her to make sure we know how sure she is. Again the other thing was that after she picked him, I think the interviewer thought she got the guy. During the actual line up, there was another issue that I think may have enforced her to pick Cotton again.
The institution of slavery in the southern states of the United States of America was primarily based on economics rather than some type of natural admiration of the practice itself. When the Mason-Dixon line was created in the 1760s, Eli Whitney’s revolutionary cotton gin, which would eventually set slavery in the South, had not been created yet. However, there were still lines being drawn between the more industrial-based economy of the North and the more agricultural economy of the South. Slavery shaped the economic backbone of the South, and as it became more widespread after Eli Whitney’s invention of the cotton gin, it became as strong as the political and social foundation of Southern character as well. Although there were times
The defense's opening statement should have attacked the evidence that the state provided, and also attacked McGlothlin's credibility. The defense's opening statement should have consisted of a description of the friendly relationship that existed between Roger Coleman and the McCoys. It also should have also included Coleman's alibi--Philip VanDyke--and the fact that VanDyke's time card reinforces the time that he said he was with Coleman and the time that he clocked into his job. Arey and Jordan also had an opportunity to smear McGlothlin's credibility by referring to evidence that he failed to mention in his opening argument--the pry mark on the door, the broken fingernails on the victim but no scratches on Coleman, and that the substance found on the victim was soil, not coal dust, which had been on Coleman's clothes. The defense counsel didn't refer to any of those facts. No scientific evidence was brought up, and it failed to respond to McGlothin's statement that there was evidence that Coleman had in fact admitted to committing the crime. The opening statement was a complete
In the video “The Confessions” presented by Frontline, a murder of a women that was committed by one man, quickly resulted into a false gang murder-rape scene committed by eight men. The victim, Michelle Bosko, was seen to be raped and killed in her apartment in Norfolk, Virginia. From the video, it has been proven that seven out of the eight men that confessed were innocent, but somehow they all received an unequal punishment. Because the innocent men admitted to a murder that they didn’t commit out of fear, they were all sentenced to some time in prison. The head detective, Glenn Ford, intimidated the men so much that they either were convinced that they were at the crime scene or they told him every detail that he wanted to hear.
She had no idea who these men were and what was their intentions. Jennifer should have known not to get in the car with strangers. All Dusty did was walked this young lady to the car and waited for Billy Joe Brown to come. If Dustin did something to Jennifer before Billy Murder her she still had a chance to remove herself from the situation.
Conclude by determining if the criminal innovation and rebellion that resulted from the strain is understandable and should be excused, or deviant and should be prosecuted. In conclusionI think that almost everything in this movie was deviant and they should be prosecuted. The cops in the movie I thought were unethical and the police should be punished as well. The reason why I say this is because all the young boys in this movie where selling drugs and committing murder. They knew it was wrong but they didn’t seem to really care nor did the police, they themselves really didn’t seem to care about what they did either for example; the two officers where on their way to a crime scene and they were drinking, and the way the handled Darryl’s body. Furthermore when Shorty ha d took Shrike’s gun and shot a man. Dt. Rocco altered Shorty’s confession. Finally there is no reason why all the young men sitting on the bench didn’t have real jobs or even go to school, they themselves and the parents should be held reasonable. Killing is wrong and nobody should feel they have the right to take someone’s else’s
In the past decade, eyewitness testimonies have cast a shadow on what is wrong with the justice system in today’s society. Before we had the advanced technology, we have today, eyewitness testimonies were solid cold-hard facts when it came to proving the defendant was guilty. However, time has changed and eyewitness testimonies have proven to be the leading causes of wrongful convictions due to misidentification. The Thompson and Cotton case is a perfect example of how eyewitness testimonies can put an innocent man behind bars.
When Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin in 1794 there was not much of an impact at first, but once the 1800’s came around the cotton gin gained popularity. The cotton gin was used in the south by slaves to separate the cotton fiber from the seeds. It had teeth that pulled the fiber apart and let the seeds fall out. The north and south, both, were impacted by the cotton gin, but depending on who you ask; workers, slaves, slave/ plantation owners, mills owners; people would have different opinions.
Welcome, friends and family. We are gathered here this afternoon to pay respects to the memory of Cotton. John Cotton. I Gerald Goodenow , feel it is an obligation and honor to be here on behalf of my fellow brothers, Shecker, Teft, Lally 1 and Lally 2, to rejoice the legacy of relationships that will never disappear.
I don’t watch much reality TV, because it really is not reality. However, I do like the show American Pickers on the History Channel.
Also the whole nanny situation was a lie, after detectives went to the apartment complex where supposable Zenaida Fernandez lived records showed that no one by that name had ever been a resident there. The next lie discovered was Casey’s employment, she was actually unemployed and not working at Universal studios like she stated. Records show that she worked there years back but was fired. Detectives saw no ambition in Casey trying to find her daughter, Casey was a liar and never did she show any type of emotions of suffering while talking to the detectives. The biggest concern to police was “Why Caylee was reported missing until a month after she was last seen?”
a) I believe Megan and Shanae Partly committed their crimes because of their communities, and their family situation because they did not have a good support structure. In the Documentary Megan has been in 11 foster homes, and her mother has a criminal record. Her mother seems to be her role model in the beginning, but she has no illusions to what kind of
As a producer, I would’ve aired this segment because it is a human interest piece it attempts to offer some answers to the questions society usually asks after seemingly unexplainable massacres such as Columbine occur. Diane definitely asked the hard questions that Sue Klebold didn’t always have direct answers for. When tragedy’s such as this occur no amount of apologetics would be sufficient to console the family of the victims, but at the very least this interview provided an opportunity to open up the conversation about teen violence and suicide. I do not believe this could have a heavily negative or positive impact on the victims families other than the fact that it would definitely stir up old emotions. The interview was intriguing because
The purpose of this paper is to discuss and analyze the practices conducted by law enforcement during the investigation of the murder of Ashley Smith. The following pages will discuss the crime scene investigation, the evidence collection, the investigative steps following the initial crime scene investigation, the interviews of witnesses and suspects, and other strategies performed by the acting case investigators. Constitutional challenges have surfaced regarding specific pieces of critical evidence and a section of this paper will analyze the admissibility of this evidence. Lastly this case’s law enforcement processes will be contrasted with textbook processes in an effort to determine the validity of the case’s outcome.
We only get barely a hint of what happened and felt a tad rushed. Now I’m going to get a little nit-picky, if this interview was going on it probably would be a little bit longer than the five minutes that had occurred. I understand that Detective Reid may have wanted to get this psycho out of there, but he still needed to follow some standard procedure, no matter how stupid it sounded like. So also the pacing also needed a little bit of work, but this story just needs a little bit of touch up. Other than that, you have a very good start, nice
After visiting the Manchester History Museum, I was greatly inspired by the cotton trade in Manchester, nicknamed by many as Cottonopolis. Many parts of the museum had several visual elements to it that caught my eye. The one that inspired me the most was a cotton spinning machine (video in separate file), therefore this is the stimulus that I have used as part of my creative process. The video of the cotton spinning machine demonstrates many of our ancestors’ history, and inspired me, as it is something that is relevant to us all. The video also gives us an insight into just how much technology has advanced, and how much of an effect the industrial revolution has had on our society. After watching the video numerous times, it sparked up a variety of questions. One of these questions that I was intrigued by was to do with the working conditions of the mills. The video of the spinning machine does not do the loudness of it any justice.