preview

Analyzing Erikson's Psychosocial Stages Of Human Development

Good Essays

Erik Erikson’s theory of psychosocial stages, is considered a significant concrete basis for understanding human progression and development (Arnold, 2016)
This essay will identify two characters’ lifespan development stages from Erik Erickson’s theory, and further explain the relevance of the identified stages in accordance with the communication used between the pair. From this communication further identifying and describing meta-communication factors that influenced the interpretation of the effective communication. In the clip of the two characters Sean and the doctor, there are two factors that contributed to conflict that will be identified and discussed. Lastly, two strategies will be identified that were utilized to reduce additional …show more content…

Sean theoretically is displaying industry vs. inferiority (Arnold, 2016). Although, clinical behaviour displayed, is evident to present, negative factors in Erikson’s lifespan development stages. Nevertheless, to successfully mature into the next stage, you must overcome tasks in ego expansion. Therefore, it seems that Sean has failed to pass the first, critical stage, ‘trust vs mistrust’. it can be challenging to develop, with a core weakness in maturity (Alligood & Tomey, 2009). Sean might be going through the motions of the stages but not successfully meeting the universal turning points. Sean’s crisis in development; industry vs. inferiority, contributes to attitudes, which result in an absence of mental capabilities to make a analysed decision. (Arnold, …show more content…

This lack of self-awareness is apparent, in his body language, verbal, and nonverbal communication and personality traits, conceivably a factor causing additional anxiety in this situation, relates to Sean’s insecurities, is the environment of a hospital setting, were Sean has no control.
Erickson’s lifespan development stages are vital to the way the two characters Sean and the doctor have communicated. Because both characters are at two various stages they both communicate different. Sean for example is displaying negative factors of communication and this is resulting from his psychosocial behaviour. This presenting stage of Sean entails communication that is immature and appropriate for a small child having a tantrum, arguing with the doctor on what he thinks his best interests are,
He does not have the correct decision making tools to communicate efficiently for theoretical development stage. Sean’s communication is aggressive, hostile and destructive. he is undeveloped and naive arguing with the doctor on what his welfare should involve. Sean does not fully understand the consequences of what might happen if he were to move (Arnold & Boggs,

Get Access