preview

Andrew Jackson's Arguments To Support The Removal Of Native Americans?

Decent Essays

Gold was discovered near Cherokee territory in Georgia. As result, Georgia desired to remove the Cherokees and relocate the Cherokees to lands west of the Mississippi river. This struck a major debate. Andrew Jackson was known to support the removal of Native Americans, so the state of Georgia took advantage of the scenario. With little difficulty, the Indian Removal Act was passed in 1830. The Cherokees did not relocate without a civilized fight. They sent several documents to Congress to argue their case. These documents included three arguments to support the sovereignty of the Cherokee nation. These three arguments were Great Britain saw the Cherokees as separated nation from the Colonists, George Washington saw them as an independent nation, and the Cherokees had the same natural rights as the United States. …show more content…

According to the Cherokee Memorials, "Great Britain established with them relationships of friendship and alliance, and at no time did she treat them as subjects and as tenants at will, to her power. In war she fought them as a separate people, and they resisted her as a nation. In peace, she spoke the language of friendship, and they replied in the voice of independence, and frequently assisted her as allies, at their choice to fight her enemies in their own way and discipline, subject to the control of their own chiefs, and unaccountable to European officers and military law" (1032-1033). Since Great Britain treated the Cherokees as a separate nation, the Cherokees were not viewed as a part of the American colonies. Therefore, the Cherokees are not subject to the rule of the United

Get Access