Animal Adoption Paper

In the field of therapy, there are numerous of therapy available out there for different type of individuals and situations as well. There is one type of therapy that usually contains people and animal, it is animal-assisted therapy is a therapeutic approach that brings animals and individuals with physical and/or emotional needs together to perform the therapy. Animal-assisted therapy tend to be focused on individuals either children or elderly for them to be able to connect with the animal thus feeling comfortable talking with the therapist. Pet therapy works for all ages, whether sick or not (Lanchnit, 2011). Although, this paper, most of the focus is on animal-assisted therapy towards children using dogs.

A highly popularized and debated topic in our modern society is the promotion of animal equality or animal rights. Many people, philosophers included, have a wide range of opinions on this topic. Two of the philosophers studied in class who discussed animal rights were Peter Singer and Carl Cohen. Singer, who has the more extreme view on animal rights, believes that all animals are equal and that the limit of sentience is the only defensible boundary of concern for the interest of others (Singer, 171). While Cohen, who’s view is more moderate than that of Singer’s, believes that animals do not have rights, stating that to have rights one must contain the ability for free moral judgment. Though, he does believe that we as

Throughout history, humans have utilized nonhuman animals for the benefit of mankind. This tendency increased as civilization developed, and presently, necessitated by staggering population growth and technological progress, human use of animals has skyrocketed. We eat them, we breed them, we use them as test subjects. Some people have begun to question the ethics of it all, sparking a debate on animal treatment and whether or not they have rights. In a paper on the subject, Carl Cohen lays out his definition of rights, explains their relationship with obligations, and uses these ideas to present the argument that manifests clearly in his piece’s title, “Why Animals Have No Rights”. THESIS

For centuries people have known that animal companionship has brought many benefits to people’s lives. According to Kathryn Heimlich, of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, the first known time a companion animal was used to aid in a therapy program was “York Retreat in England, an establishment founded by the Quakers for persons with mental illness” (Heimlich, 2001, p. 48). As stated by Heimlich, the first published reports of the benefits of animal-assisted therapy come from Psychologist Boris Levinson. Levinson “discovered that he could reach a disturbed child during therapy

In depth discussion and details of the research conducted that elaborates on the effectiveness of service animals- how do they help?

Regan introduces his stance in The Case for Animal Rights on how we view non-humans as less than the intrinsic value. Regan’s mentality is about how we have this sense of value for each other, and how we should translate that respect and value to others, like animals. We treat “immoral humans” (criminals) with basic human respect (food, shelter, and hygiene). While, there are some people that do not take care of animals with the same respect as we treat humans. Animals are a part of the world that we live in, but we have grown used to seeing animals as lower than us. Regan’s viewpoint shows how we should see all beings as equals with inherent value. Regan sees this as part of the Respect Principle, a principle where we treat individuals who have inherent value in ways that respect their inherent value (322). His main argument is that everything has a subject-of-life criterion. Subject-of-life criterion is the philosophy that everything is alive with inherent value.

Regan explains that the connection between inherent value and the equality of those rights between humans and animals is important. While we treat humans that lack inherent qualities as they do, we should treat animals this same way as they do have a rudimentary awareness of what’s good and bad for

By October 2012, a woman by the name of Jennifer Conrad, a professional exotic veterinarian, has released a documentary that has opened the eyes of many cat owners around the world. In this

Gary has been holding a position where he has been fighting for animal rights through his books. He argues that animals are seen as property instead of a person. There are several reason as to why animal rights are the way they are, and until laws are changed animals will continue to suffer.( Gary L. Francione,1996) To support his argument he studies the results from when common-law, civil-law traditions are involved. These laws are relevant, because it gives scientist and food distributor’s leverage to give reason as to why animals’ being considered property is not a form of abuse. Gary opposes this claim for a very good reason; he states that animals have a “defect”, such as their incapability to communicate using language. Gary finds that the issues with this are that, welfare is failing to recognize the interest of animals. In his observation he finds that the key to provide animals with useful rights is to convince society, exercise wellness benefits, and demand change.

I chose my project by understanding that I love to sew and help others. I could have made blankets as well but I believed that the children in the care of lutheran family services would appreciate the stuffed animals more. The organization that I donated to helps kids who are refugees, kids in foster care, homeless kids, and even run a adoption program. These kids will come into these programs with little to nothing to hold close to them, in fact they are alone with no parents or with parents who have no money and are incapable of caring for them. My goal for this project was to make the kids who have nothing feel that they have something. Give them a chance to feel loved, and have a friend who will never leave them behind. Also, I

A question we are asked at least once in our lives is, “Are the rights reserved for humans and the rights reserved for animals equal in the amount of importance or value?” Peter Singer, a utilitarian, and Tom Regan, a deontologist both believe in animal rights. However, they don’t agree on every single aspect regarding the rights for animals. Singer believes humans and animals both have rights, but they don’t have the equal capacity to feel pleasure or pain. On the other hand, Regan’s views differ. He thinks that the rights for humans and animals are of equal value. I agree with them both. Animals should have rights and be treated with respect, but when it comes to saving my sister or my dog, I’d save my sister.

In the United States, individuals frequently say that they cherish creatures and that they view their pets as a component of the family, however many adhere to a meaningful boundary at every living creature 's common sense entitlement. Is it safe to say that it isn 't sufficient that we treat them others consciously? Why ought to creatures have rights? What rights ought to creatures have? How those are rights not quite the same as human rights? The truth is that since the U.S. Division of Agriculture issued the 1966 Animal Welfare Act, even creatures utilized as a part of business cultivating are qualified for a specific base-level of treatment. In any case, that contrasts from the needs of every living creature 's common sense entitlement dissident gatherings like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) or the more extraordinary British direct-activity amass known as the Animal Liberation Front. The creature welfare see, which is discernable from the every living creature 's common sense entitlement view, is that people can utilize and misuse creatures the length of the creatures are dealt with compassionately and the utilization is not very silly. To every living creature 's common sense entitlement activists, the principle issue with this view is that people don 't have the privilege to utilize and misuse creatures, regardless of how well the creatures are dealt with.

Intentionally, I’m interested in this issue because if this issue can somehow be open to every adopted individual it can eventually lead to a better understanding of any untold and unanswered questions. It matters to me because of how it can impact an adopted individual's life to not know valuable information about yourself that can be a big impact in their future. I feel that it matters to society because of the unknowingly times it happens in those individual lives. This issue seems to be of greater importance today because of the difficulty of not having easy access to adoption records that holds most importantly their identity that despite the individual had no way of choosing that circumstance of life.

Pet adoption brings myriad health benefits. One of these benefits is the loyal companionship of shelter animals. GAWS shelter’s acting chief executive, Mia Shaw states, “There are big positives for a person’s mental and physical wellbeing in adopting a pet – there are so many benefits to adopting a dog or cat, including companionship and friendship” (qtd. in Sum 19). These animals help human beings physically and mentally by providing another incentive to exercise, and by providing a steady companionship. These benefits could potentially save the lives of depressed people and improve the lives of incapacitated people. Inclusively, shelter animals reduce stress and other health-related issues. Rescue cat owner, Lisa Barley notes, “Not only will you benefit from the joys of a furry friend’s unconditional love, but a pet can have a positive impact on your health, from helping you stay physically active to reducing stress and lowering blood pressure” (48). Adopting a pet is much like obtaining a best friend, who will provide unconditional love and support when the person needs it the most. Furthermore, most of the shelter animals are caged for days or even months, resulting in being restricted from social environments. Consequently, these animals end up being friendlier when they are adopted and placed in a steady home, unlike the ones obtained

Initially, simply by observing the care Suncoast Animal League provides the animals, Maslow’s Hierarchy can certainly be applied. Before anything else, an animal’s physiological needs must be met. Thus, it is highly stressed at the shelter to maintain a healthy diet for each animal. Additionally, spotting illnesses and injuries quickly is a major priority. After all, an animal must be healthy before it can find a new home. Following this, workers become concerned with the housing arrangements for the creature. The cat or dog will either reside in a foster home or at the shelter. Foster homes are preferred as it is far safer for the animal and allows them to experience what it will truly be like to live in a forever family. Once the animal is settled in, creating a connection with the foster family or with volunteer workers becomes critical. Without socialization, some cats and dogs would never be prepared to go to a new home. None