Animal Testing And The Utilization Of Animals

Researchers treat animals right because they use them to uncover cures and treatment that humans can use. Scientist Hollis Cline and Mar Sanchez stated, “that animals in research are treated “humanely and with dignity” (Garner, 2016). These two scientists reassured the reader that animals subjected to testing are treated with respect. They are not treated in bad testing conditions, which may harm the animals and manipulate the outcome of the test. In addition to these scientists claim, there are also laws protecting animals, such as “federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA), and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)” (ProCon, 2017). Treating these animals with dignity is correct by the researchers because the animal is sacrificing his/her freedom to the outside world so it can be experiment on to find medical treatments and cures for

A life can be taken or created in a matter of seconds and with that has come the miracles of modern medicine. People have come to expect science to save lives, prevent illness, relieve suffering and improve the quality of life. The means of curing, treating and preventing diseases are not achieved by magic or accident. Medical advances are gained through years of intensive research -- research in which laboratory animals have played, and continue to play, a critical role. Opponents of animal testing are wrongfully determined that this process is completely unethical.

Every year over more than one hundred million animals are killed in labs for experimental research,

Animals have successfully been used to understand biological processes, assess safety of different chemicals, develop vaccines and antibiotics, produce treatments for hepatitis C, rheumatoid arthritis, polio, diabetes and many more . However, it is impossible to know if the use of animals was required to acquire this research or if the amount of suffering and death could have been reduced or avoided in order to achieve the same results. It is well established that animals have been invaluable in the pursuit of biomedical research, and the benefits from using animals currently means that eliminating animal research is also immoral. This is because the benefits received from some research greatly outweigh the potential costs to the animals and it would be unjust not to perform such experiments. Consequently, animal research should not be fully banned due to the benefits it yields, but should be more heavily regulated to reduce the moral costs.

Animal research has led to numerous improvements for the quality of life in humans and other animals. The humane treatment of animals requires that if there is an alternative way of getting the same results, without using animals, then that should be done. Reducing the number of animals used for research would result in an increase in humans being used for research; therefore, it is not reasonable to decrease the number of test animals. Humans cannot justify an objection to killing an animal involved in a biomedical investigation if they are willing to eat animals. The killing of an animal to meet the needs of human beings is judged as reasonable by most people. The enormous amount of benefits to human beings has made biomedical experimentation on animals justifiable. Non-human animals have non-negligible moral worth. Causing and animal to go through excruciating pain to bring a tinge of pleasure to a human is wrong. Believing there is a moral difference between evil we do and evil we do not prevent must be rejected to make the researchers’ calculations implausible. It is believed that perpetrating and evil is worse than permitting an

“Many medical treatments have been made possible by animal testing, including cancer and HIV drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines and many more” (Murnaghan 1).

Everyone acknowledges that animals and humans are similar in more ways than one. Animal testing has proven to be a valuable asset in scientific research, cosmetic manufacturing, and drug development ("About Us"). Animal research, testing, and experimentation has assisted other countries, for example, in the United Kingdom over 400,000 people with Type 1 diabetes now have insulin to rely on. “Animal research and testing has played a part in almost every medical breakthrough of the last century. It has saved hundreds of millions of lives worldwide…” – Former UK Home Office Minister Joan Ryan. According to the House of Lords Select Committee “experimentations on animals have contributed greatly to scientific advances”. While it all may be true, we fail to

Do you know what happens behind the closed doors of scientist labs? You probably do not because of the cruel things that animals go through every day. People probably don 't think this is a big deal, but I am neutral on the subject. But, I do see the wrong and right things that are happening. Animals are taken advantage of in terrible ways every single day in scientists ' labs all around the world. But, they help us with many health benefits. Health benefits at could change and even cure some diseases all around the world. When it gets to a certain point, though, is when I feel like it is wrong to be killing innocent animals. They have life 's too, and they deserve to live it. Animal testing is a cruel and a somewhat beneficial way that

In conclusion, animal research is important to saving the lives of many people. Animal testing is used to determine how much of a drug is being absorbed into the blood. Animal testing enabled the development of countless lifesaving treatments for both humans and animals, that there is no alternative method for researching a completely living organism and that strictly regulates and prevents the mistreatment of animals in the laboratory. (prezi.com) Animals should be used in laboratories to continue to find advancements

For human beings, the development of medical fields brings a variety of treatments and cures. Animal testing contributes to inventions of new drugs which treat different types of diseases and illnesses, which save countless human lives However, with moral reasons, animal research is labeled as inhumane and heartless by animal rights activists. There are a lot of campaigns that against animal testing, and experts in the medical field are threatened because of using animal to do research. “According to the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, about 220 illegal incidents — including arson and bombings — were reported in the United States from 1990 to 2012” (qtd.in Collier). As fighting back, the article “Animal Rights: Scientists’

For centuries, the ethics of animal experimentation in the biomedical field have been questioned. Do the benefits of animals used in research outweigh the pain the animals endure? Animal rights activists will argue there are new alternatives that there are more accurate than animal testing. The success of trials on animals, has led to the continued use by scientists within the medical field. Additionally, testing on animals instead of humans puts humans out of harms way. The first Animal Cruelty Act was created in 1835 to regulate the use of animals for scientific purposes. According to Franco (2013), the “Enactment of the 1986 Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, remains the only known legislation to regulate animal experiments for nearly 50 years.” Even so, there will continue to be two sides of animal research, one side believes, without animal research there would not be the medical advancements present to this day. On the other hand, the use of animal research is unethical and the finding of new alternatives may also be even more beneficial than animal testing. Therefore, the medical field should either seek alternatives to animal research or the methods are refined to reduce the unethical treatment towards the animals as subjects.

Around 17 to 22 million animals are being tested for harmful products a year. They are having to go through physical pain by being cut up, poisoned, burned, irradiated, gassed, shocked, dismembered or genetically designed to suffer. Animals are being forced to have to go through so much pain trying out the products you use today and then having to be trapped in cages for the rest of their lives just because they might of not had a home. They are being abused for the scientists experiments. In 2017 studies found that most of the data they gathered was false, and wasting the animals lives. According to the article from procon.com¨Since the majority of animals used in biomedical research are killed during or after the experiments, and since many suffer during the studies, the lives and wellbeing of animals are routinely sacrificed for poor research.¨

Imagine waking up one morning to find your husband or wife lying unconscious in bed spewing a pool of black bile from their mouth and onto the pillow gently supporting their head. Imagine having to call the paramedics to rush your loved one to the emergency room only to find out that your partner has been diagnosed with a rare and deadly disease. Imagine the frustration you feel when the doctor pulls you to the side of the waiting room to inform you that a vaccine has proven to be effective in treating this disease in lab rats. Would you accept the doctor’s suggestion and have your soul mate be treated with this vaccine not knowing whether or not it would work? Or knowing that the cure may have come from unwilling test animals? Or would you ultimately let nature run its course and let your spouse die? Over the years, animal research has led to the development of numerous vaccines and cures that are now used to save lives in several countries across the globe. Scientists and doctors alike acknowledge this and recognize how essential and beneficial animals are in biomedical research. However, before discussing the different views that are associated with conducting biomedical research experiments on animals, one must understand its history. It is a common misconception that animal research is a new scientific and medical practice, but it is actually an ancient procedure. Animal research began in ancient Greece, “… where Greek physician-scientists, such as Aristotle and

Using animals in research and to test products has been a topic of heated debate for many years. Animals have contributed to research and we have found many cures to diseases that would have otherwise killed us. Many individuals view animals as companions that exhibit emotion and have a personality, they’re not viewed as lab subjects. The fact remains that animals are utilized by research facilities and cosmetics companies, not just across the country but around the entire world. Although humans do benefit from animal research, the pain, suffering, and annual deaths of over one hundred million animals are not worth the human benefits. Why should animals suffer unnecessarily for the human benefit? Animals are given diseases that they would

The use of animals for scientific purposes, in order to better understand a particular disease, develop new medicines or to check the safety of a drug, causes a lot of conflicting reactions. Some believe that no moral problem is here; other, rushing to the opposite extreme, willing to justify violence in order to protect animals. Experiments on animals - are a huge industry. Every year, British scientists use nearly 3 million animals for research purposes. Most used for development and testing of drugs for human diseases, although each year about 17,000 animals are used for testing the safety of food additives and household chemicals. Now the number of animals exposed to similar experiences reduced. Although traditional animal experiments are gradually decreasing, new spheres of experimental studies are appeared. For example, now more and more animal are used for experiments in genetic engineering. In some cases, scientists introduce human genes into an animal. Such transgenic animals can develop the disease very similar to human one. Studying the impact of the disease on the body of transgenic animals, the scientists explain the