Annotated Bibliography On Media Bias

Media has been playing a significant role in our daily lives by developing our personalities, enriching our knowledge and providing us with different sorts of information. It has a tremendous power in framing cultural guidelines and shaping political dissertation. If the information provided to the U.S. citizens is distorted, then they cannot make informed decisions on the matters of public policy. Thus, it becomes vital to the American democracy that the news media and its institutions remain unbiased, fair and accurate. Media bias happens when a media systematically and persistently emphasize one particular point of view that is usually below the standards of professional journalism. There can be various reasons for media bias, some of

In a general sense society derives much of their beliefs and indifferences from stories that are covered in the media. If the stories are being reported biased, how can we, as a society, see the whole picture? The author's purpose is to inform readers about the different biases that news and media sway by and to provide evidence that proves instances when these biases have weakened the validity of the reporter's story. "Journalist are like dogs-whenever anything moves, they begin to bark." (Gladstone, 2011/2013, P.25)

It is important that news broadcasting networks do not let personal bias effect the story that’s being told to its audience. People who watch the news, opinions are heavily influenced by the information given to them. Viewers think their opinion is original but are unaware that the information they receive is biased and is meant to influence and form their opinions about a certain topic or argument. Many believe that the news is unbiased and factual because journalist or experts are providing them with evidence.When, in fact, these news outlets are filled with producers, reporters, and writers, who share the same viewpoints. This is groupthink and groupthink is very prominent in news broadcasting networks. Groupthink is when a group of people who share the same ideologies make decisions as a group. In an interview with Fox Business’s John Stossel, Bernie Goldberg explains that groupthink effects the viewer because like-minded people at news networks only show the audience one-side of an argument or story because of their personal opinions on a the topic. This means that news

This paragraph will go through if the media are bias and use the example of newspaper endorsements and its effects on voting. According to recent survey data over a half of voters believe that the American media is biased. But another forty percent say that they filter out the media because of how biased it is. Newspapers are driven by an economic motive more than a political motive, which is why it wouldn’t make sense for newspapers to just be biased without any real economic motive. The only real explanation for this is that newspapers are biased only towards what their consumers want to hear, and if consumers hear what they want to hear then they will keep buying the newspaper. Newspaper endorsements are a very popular method by newspapers

To understand what state the modern media system is in, one must firmly understand what bias is. Media bias is present “when a political belief or commercial interest distorts the level of reporting” (“Media Bias” 1). If a political station provides positive or accurate information to only one side, then the station can be considered biased. Another form of bias is known as sensationalism. Sensationalism is the creation of panic or fear by over-reporting or over-inflating individual news stories, often blurring facts or reporting speculation as facts. A modern and familiar example of media

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

If you have a television and watch your political news programs chances are you are being lied to. The media wants you to hear their “facts”. These “facts” are always skewed to favor their side. They are agenda pushing liars who won’t report the way they are supposed to. With biased and ridiculing media is controlling how you think this is a fact whether the media wants to admit to it or not, they try to control this country. It is destroying this once proud nation. Through bias, unfair, poor journalism the media polarized the nation, they do not do the job they were made to do, and they have produced a bunch of rioting little brats.

The topic of media bias has been the focus of many conversations in our society recently. I believe that this is a very important topic to discuss because most of the information we are receiving comes from one media outlet or another. More often than not, people will only hear one side of the story because they believe that the news being told to them is the most accurate. In reality, most news stations have their own agendas, resulting in the omission of some truths. These days, media bias can be observed almost everywhere we look. Today, there are many people who immerse themselves in the news that they are being told, so much so, that they believe nothing else. People are often so entrenched in their beliefs, it keeps people from being open

I also do not understand how ads before YouTube videos are fake news. They are just ads trying to sell real products. Although, I would like to know who you think is at fault for the fake news being spread throughout the media? In my personal opinion I believe the writers of the fake news are at fault because they know what they are writing is false. People like Cameron Harris just want to make money and do not care about whether they spread real facts or not. Do you think if we stopped fake news writers from making money, that it would also decrease the spread of fake information?

The corporations have the capacity to censor or alter important issues that go against their political or ideological positions in the news and in other media outlets. Media can affect and shape public views on numerous issues by leading them in a way that fits in with the views of the organization. Since the media companies have consolidated individuals are less exposed to outside views or particular viewpoints to issues. The current issue can fit within the realm of propaganda, people watch and read what is available and intensely promoted (Chomsky & Herman, 2002). If powerful corporations merge with others they are able to send out their own message and as frequently as they would like. In the news, broadcasters can exaggerate what their own points of views are on certain subjects to make individuals alter their own beliefs, as a result (Chomsky & Herman, 2002). However, we can also argue that with current technologies individuals can go beyond the news to get their information by using the web for example. With the current technologies, individuals can also verify is statements made by the media contain some truth. What would be interesting to look at would be the racial and gender composition of media corporations and its effect on the diversity of media. Furthermore, the analysis of media consolidation proves to be beneficial in the eyes of capitalism.

In his article, “Who Are the Media Manipulators?” Reed Irvine effectively proves that there is a large number in the media industry who impose their will on everyone else. In Irvine’s article, he gives the statistics in a survey completed by two men by the names of Robert Lichter and Stanley Rothman. The survey these men did was on the views of important people in the media industry. Irvine includes another survey completed by Lichter and Rothman along with Mrs. Linda Lichter. It was made of important people in the media referred to as the creative cream of the TV industry. Throughout his article, Irvine quotes one statistic after another on different political, economic, and social issues of the day; giving the reader precise numbers. Irvine

The lack of funding for newspaper companies causes concentrated ownership and leads to biased news coverage. “Media markets are inherently concentrated, and to the extent that market profitability cannot accommodate sufficiently competitive markets, absent alternative funding, the ensuing concentration levels may unavoidably yield biased coverage.” (Germano & Meier 2012). When newspaper companies are lacking funding, they may get replaced by bigger companies who have the money to stay in

In this paper I will examine how the US government policies, over a period of time, have helped in the consolidation (and convergence) of media and communication industry. Media policy, Tunstall says, is an area in which national politicians combine “fantasy, self-delusion, and moral high purpose with a fondness for seeking crude short-term political advantage” (Tunstall, The Anglo-American Media Connection, 1999:4).

George has proved a highly motivated student of Economics with a lively interest in the subject and it’s issues,, and he has achieved an excellent understanding of the key economic models and concepts. In class he has been attentive and his contributions to class discussion have been mature and insightful. James summative assessment work has been well prepared and of a high standard. George’s

The information is very important for people in communities. Citizens can receive the information from a variety of mass media such as televisions, radios, and newspapers, and also get from new media such as the Internet. This information has affected to people who use data for making social and political decisions (Ederstone, 2011, p. 140). Media ownerships play an important role as man in the middle by collected facts from their journalists and spread to general public. Also the same information can disseminate to worldwide through new media. The purpose of this assignment is to illustrate the benefits of concentrated media ownership, including news to become international and a variety of services and products. It will then go on to describe the disadvantages, which involve diversity of content and lack of neutrality.