preview

Antagonism In The Things They Carried

Better Essays

The Allegorical Portrayal of Vietnam as the Antagonist in The Things They Carried
War stories old and modern alike are often characterized by morality. Embellished with sensory detail and loaded with emotion, they appeal to a higher moral purpose that concludes with an uplifting message, effectively restoring one’s faith in humanity and the glimmer hope that accompanies the grim reality of war. However, in The Things They Carried, Tim O’Brien argues the exact opposite. He warns of stories seeming “moral,” asserting that true war stories contain “no rectitude whatsoever…no virtue” (65). In this way, he defies the traditional war story in favor of creating a non-linear timeline with an overarching theme, a theme that displays no clear morals but rather “uncompromising allegiance to obscenity and evil” (66). Although this extreme …show more content…

Given that post-modernism involves an “experimental” style and a narrative that progresses in “different and contrasting directions,” (Bradbury 765) it can be argued that The Things They Carried is a work of metafiction, which concentrates on story telling and its higher purpose rather than being weighted down by what is considered to be reality. The “epistemological ambivalence” regarding the antagonist especially leads one to note the importance of the deliberate choice made by Tim O’Brien to create this allegorical adversary as opposed to a more tangible villain typical of a ‘war story’ (43). Had he chosen to portray the villain as the man he had killed, or Vietnam’s army as a whole, his desired effect—to declare a larger anti-war message –would not have relayed the same powerful impact to his audience. By representing the war itself through the landscape of Vietnam, O’Brien personifies the war through nature’s all-consuming course in order to show how war corrupts and consumes, that it stops for no

Get Access