Are we Americans viewed by our leaders as rational, free citizens of a completely operational democracy, or purely as a collective of mindless consumers? Looking for the answer in media and political discussions, isn't very encouraging. There we find that those who are seeking our votes and our political support act like salespeople delivering pitches to a marketplace of potential customers, rather than leaders, offering intelligent and responsible citizens formed debates based upon clear evidence and logical opposition. The difference between consumer and citizen is viable to the understanding of the causes of the degradation of our political institutions as well as our capitalism. The model consumer is motivated by the desire to maximize desired satisfaction. Values are understood as prices and willingness to pay; thus the moral values such as virtue and justice is dismissed. People with something to sell whether be a product or service, any sort of promoting will be effective toward the consumer. In contrast, the ideal citizen takes a the moral point of view, by perceiving themself as one equal member among many committed in the combined effort for a mutual advantage; community. The citizen, as a moral advocator, …show more content…
Companies stand to lose a lot of profits once the patent expires on a widely used drug. The hugely popular antidepressant Prozac was a drug about to lose its patent, so what could the company do? They didn't want to lose millions of dollars did they? The company came up with a new plan, they created a new condition, PMDD (Pre-Menstrual Dysphoric Disorder), and then went to the FDA and doctors with their highly paid "experts" who convinced them that PMDD is a tragic disease. Their plan worked and got the "new" drug Sarafem (the same drug)
Many other drugs also lose patent protection leading to the creation of substitutes that are cheaper.
Despite being one of the oldest and most consistently stable democracies in the Western world, the American government, and American democracy as a whole, has frequently come under fire in recent years. Whether it is political parties, pundits, bloggers or citizens, Americans and non-Americans are all lining up to take shots at what they diagnose as a storied democracy crumbling before their eyes. Two of Robert Dahl’s criteria for a healthy democracy are enlightened understanding: are citizens able to acquire the political information necessary to participate in their own democracy, and control of the agenda: do the American senators and members of congress have exclusive and
In chapter 7 of The Good Citizen, Russell Dalton (2009) analyzes how changing in norms of citizenship has reshaped the American’s image to their government. The structure of this chapter is broken down into three levels of political support: political authorities, regime and political community to separately illustrate the impact of the shift in citizenship norms based on the Dalton’s concrete theory on duty-based citizenship and engaged citizenship (Dalton, 2009, 120). To reemphasize the Dalton’s theory, duty-based citizens are portrayed as people who are obedient and allegiant to the political system while engaged citizens have more critical and assertive view towards to the ruling system (Dalton, 2009). This summary will begin with point out the decline in political trust and then use the three levels of political support to examine whether the diminished trend of political
The good citizen will education his family and his community by being a role model and preforming his civic duties. Roosevelt shapes his ideas of citizenship around how a man treats the people around him which impacts the entire community. Roosevelt’s ideal citizen focuses more on the lived experience of a man and his actions in community which reflect on public engagement.
Something is wrong with the focus on the "drug war" when 200,000 people die each year from prescription drugs, yet only 20,000 die from illegal drug use. Adverse reactions of prescription drugs are the third leading cause of death in America. In fact, people have a seven times greater chance of dying walking into their doctor's office than they do getting behind the wheel of their car! Every year approximately 200,000 souls die from prescription drug reactions with another 80,000 dying from medical malpractice (The International). Where is the FDA? Why do they continue to allow doctors to prescribe these drugs? How could they let it get to this point? What once was believed to be a
The American political system is built on simple but revolutionary principles from our founding Fathers. These principles state that self-governance is an absolute right and the governments purpose is to serve the interests of the people. Characteristics which are essential to a healthy, functioning democracy. But America has stumbled upon a formidable roadblock to the realization of our founding fathers dream, as Lincoln said, of a country that is "of the people, by the people and for the people"( Citizens at Work, 2003). There are many factors that distort this reality and the main
Calef’s view of our government along with the culture surrounding it, is similar to TIMM’s in a way that reflects the nation’s consumer culture. “Capitalism tempts us to equate our self-worth with our economic position and to judge others by that standard too”
I think that “Great citizenship: society becomes how we behave”, is a variant upon the Gandhi’s saying, ”be the change that you want to see in the world.” This points out the every problem the society faces is everyone’s problem, the ideology of the people “that’s not my
Pharmaceutical companies also defend the costs because of the patent laws. When a patent expires, a generic drug can be made and sold for lower cost. "Although
Aiding in the national prescription drug addiction epidemic, makers of antipsychotics will remarket brands when their “patents expire”. Rebranding existing medications is extremely dangerous to patients and can sometimes lead to death. In Oldani’s study he emphasizes the dangers of rebranding psychotropics.
When we break our arm everyone runs forward to sign the cast but when we say we have depression everyone turns and runs the other way. This author shows how severe depression can form and issues that can be associated with severe depression. The way Elizabeth Wurtzel depicts depression and the substance abuse that can be related to severe depression is impeccable in her non-fiction novel Prozac Nation. Depression affects more than 350 million people worldwide and is the most common of all the mental illnesses, it doesn’t have a cure but it is manageable with proper medication. Elizabeth Wurtzel has said “ I made ‘Prozac Nation’ a necessary reading because I write necessarily. I tell my story because it is about everyone else: in 1993, people took pills to relieve the pain just like they do now, but it scared them; it doesn’t anymore, because talk is not cheap at all -- it is tender”i think this is very important because it shows how hushed the talk about the facts on mental illness are. Although depression is shown to be an individual illness, the author effectively demonstrates the massive toll depression takes on family and friends. For example, depression takes a toll on your family and friends by having to watch you suffer and be in pain and not be able to do anything about it. Secondly, your family and friends are stuck watching as depression takes you
Consumerism is a description of society’s lifestyle in which many people embrace to achieve their goals by acquiring goods that they clearly do not need (Stearns, 7). The idea that the market is shaped by the choice of the consumers’ needs and wants can be defined as a consumer sovereignty (Goodwin, Nelson, Ackerman, Weisskopf, 2). This belief is based on the assumption that the consumer knows what it wants. Contrary to this logic, marketers convince us that the consumer does not know what they want. The consumer has to be told what they want or be persuaded by advertising items in a matter that demonstrates the reason a product makes their life easier or will improve their life instantly. As one of the most successful entrepreneurs,
* Competitive Pricing – Merck is sometimes forced to lower prices of products, either ones that have gone off patent to maintain market share in the product, as well as for products that are still on patent in order to compete with rival products for the same treatment that are marketed by competitors
Moreover, generic drugs manufacturers sometimes start production of patent-protected drug analogues even before a patent expires. Although research-oriented companies in many cases are able to protect their patents, they do suffer from lost revenues.
There were two important developments in the 1970s which further shaped the industry in the form that we see today. Firstly, the Thalidomide tragedy (where an antiemetic given for morning sickness caused birth defects) led to much tighter regulatory controls on clinical trials, greatly increasing development costs. Secondly, enactment of legislation to set a fixed period on patent protection (typically 20 years from initial filing as a research discovery) led to the appearance of “generic” medicines. Generics medicines are those that have exactly the same active ingredients as the original brand, and compete on price.