Are children naturally powerless, or is it their subordinate position in society socially constructed? Affirmative case: Children are naturally powerless
Introduction
The image of children being naturally innocent has been the dominant discourse and idealised view in society. This concept views children as powerless, helpless, and in need of adult protection (Sorin 2005). The period of childhood is considered a time of passive and obedience. Where children’s knowledge and experiences are decided and provided for them by their parents and authorities (Sorin 2005; Woodrow 1999).
The purpose of this position paper is to explain both sides of the issue – ‘are children naturally powerless, or is their subordinate position in society socially constructed. My position for this debate is the affirmative, No!! Children are not naturally powerless, as their subordinate position in society is socially constructed.
Background
Childhood refers to the period between birth, adolescence and adulthood and is recognised as a socially constructed period of time, where children are subordinate to adults (Neale & Smart 1998). Traditionally, there are three prevailing images of a child: the innocent child, who
…show more content…
This is because, policy makers and the adults in children’s life’s, usually use the age and maturity of children as an excuse to exclude children from the decision-making processes (Hart, Lee, & Wernham 2011;Thomas 2002). Biological immaturity is the idea that children are not mature enough to form their own opinions and beliefs. Children are conceived, as not fully formed citizens. This notion is used to exclude children in participating in the development of society’s laws, policies and practice. Thus opposition uses this excuse to justify that children are not independent to make decisions
There is little evidence of what it was really like in the past so it is difficult for a lot of people to re-construct the life of a child, however from what I have researched, and in my own opinion I am going to summarise the historical changes in childhood experience and relate these changes to childhood development and rights.
“childhood is socially constructed. It is in other words, what members of particular societies, at particular times, and in particular places, say it is. There is no single universal childhood experienced by all. So childhood isn't 'natural' and should be distinguished from mere biological immaturity”
In the article, “In a war, children without a childhood,” by Los Angeles Times, the central idea was that children lose their innocence because they lost their childhood. For example, many children lost their childhood because they’ve watched their parents become victims of murder. According to the article, “Children have seen their parents killed and watched as boys and girls just like them were hurt.” Well, when children see their parents get killed, they tend to grow up with brutal, aggressive tendencies, which causes them to lose their innocence. In addition to being orphaned, children will grow up making mature, adult decisions, also causing them to lose their youth. In conclusion, when children lose their childhood, they lose their
Different discourses of childhood have different ideas of childhood which has different implications on the way in which children are treated. Within the social constructionist theory there are 3 main discourses - romantic, puritan and tabula rasa. This essay will look
Childhood is a crucial time in a person’s life and it needs to be kept innocent and pure for the child’s well-being later in life. The most important recurring theme in the novel Lullabies for Little Criminals by Heather O’Neill is the loss of innocence at a young age and the profound complications later in life. The complete loss of innocence is built-up with multiple different experiences over time. For Baby, these experiences are: when she is first exposed to drug use, when she spends time in foster care and when she becomes engaged in prostitution.
During early modern Europe, children were viewed in many different ways which changed how parents chose to raise their children. During the 1500’s, the mortality rates for children were high, therefore children were viewed as if they were adults and very precious if they survived, many people believed that they needed to treat children harshly to make them strong. In the 1600’s, children were raised tenderly as they were rational beings that could use reason. Children were viewed in many ways during early modern Europe to be rational, precious, and in need of guidance where these views determined the parents’ choice in child rearing to behaving harshly to kind guidance.
One of the main features of childhood studies is the idea that childhood is socially constructed. This means that not all childhoods are the same and that it may differ depending on the time in which it is taking place, as well as the social environment or the place that it is taking place. This can be seen at the Museum of Childhood, and how different times have shown changes in the way children act, play, dress, or ultimately are treated in society. Additionally it draws on key differences in the human societies affecting different childhoods in any given period or place, and can examine how the childhood in that given period is constructed. Furthermore a social constructionist looks at the consequences of any given factor and the impact it has on children.
Since the seventeenth century, children have been given a voice in the family home; by letting them to make their own choices. Reference This has changed the nature of childhood dramatically, which can be seen a positive and negative effect. It has enabled children to be more independent with decision making which prepares children more for adulthood; this is what childhood is ‘supposed’ to do. On the other hand, it can put too much burden on the child, meaning they are being treated more like an adult rather than a child.
Childhood is the age span ranging from birth to adolescence and its non-specific for it can imply a varying range of years in human development reference. The age ranges anywhere from 12 years to 15years with 18years being most common. Previous research done by sociologists focused on children primarily in terms of socialization and within the context of the family. The ‘new sociology of childhood’ argues that children inhabit more than one world, worlds that may well conflict those of adults, those of children 's own making, and those that children
In “The Kids Are Not All Right ,” author Joel Bakan argues that it is necessary to believe that childhood itself is now in a crisis. He states that it is necessary to reignite the guiding of ethos and practices of the century of the child. Bakan claims that children are endangered due to the exposure to violent media, potentially harmful psychotropic drugs, and increasing quantities of toxic channels. The author believes that we should work together as citizens to provide a safe community, through democratic channels and institutions, to bring change.
In the opening of the article, the author criticizes that children of the 21st century have lost
This book examines the distinctive contribution of sociology to debates on children and childhood although this is not at the exclusion of other disciplines such as education, geography or psychology. The book is structured around three core ideas; they are children, childhood and generation. Leonard examines the relationship between structure (e.g. laws, culture, religion and policy) and agency (e.g. the ways in which children can take action or influence and change their lives). Leonard argues that the lives of adults and children are inter-linked and conceptualises this as ‘generagency’. The author cites a wide range of research studies exploring children’s lives to support her argument. This text may support undergraduates and post-graduates
“The Science of Raising Courageous Kids” (Martin Brokenleg 2003), is a research based article that discusses the history of how children were viewed and treated by older civilizations and how the view has shifted to children as Brokenleg and Bockern (2003) stated, “sacred beings” and “gifts of the Gods” (p.22). Then, Brokenleg discusses what children need, act, feel, and who they are as a person- the main argument here. Children should be viewed as people of society; they are just in the learning stages of basic norms and human interaction. Lastly, the article discusses the importance of implementing these theories into the classroom in order to create courage kids.
To conclude, Western societies have a societal structure in which the individual who is at the top of the organisation receive greater respect from those who are below him. Similarly, in a westernised society, the parents would be the one at the top of the structure and the children would be below them. Hence, this notion creates a conflict between the children’s individual autonomy and the social structure as the children’s freedom of speech and action are being ‘violated’ and not paid respect to when the parent is constantly the decision maker. In contrast, Lee illustrates that in order to resolve this conflict, many Aboriginal, Sikh and Burma societies approach child-rearing in a different manner. In those societies, individual autonomy is shaped by the cultural framework, the individual integrity of the child as well as the parent is respected by one another and the idea of self-governance provides freedom to everyone. Finally, in an attempt to reconcile this conflict, child-rearing in the societies explored by Lee,
The child has not been perceived like an individual until the work of eighteen century philosophers Locke and Rousseau, who expressed their thoughts on paper about the child's ability to