In our debate we discussed whether women are just as violent as men. The pro side of the debate said yes women are just as violent as men, and the opposing side said men are more violent than women. In the yes side of the debate violence was described as physical and emotional assaults. As in violent acts carried out with the intention of causing another person physical pain or injury, no matter whether actual injury occurs, and any unjust, cruel act, or maltreatment of another human being. In the no side of the debate violence was just described as physical assaults, and not emotional assaults. This paper will discuss both sides of the debate, and the pros and cons of the arguments made by both sides.
The pro side of the debate used the
…show more content…
The pro side also found out in one survey men and women reported approximately equal rates of being assaulted by their partner, for three types of assault, slapping, hitting, and kicking. This survey was done in Australia, but the results found were in line with American data, which also show no significant differences (Headey, Scott, & Vaus, 1999). The no side also used their introduction to state what research they had found. One fact the no side discovered was that if a boy sees his father be violent while he grows up, he is more likely to be violent to his future partner. The no side also found studies that stated men inflicted more serious injuries to women, than women do to men.
In the defense and critique part of the debate the yes side said men are at least as likely as women to be victims of domestic assaults that lead to injury and pain. In defense, the no side said men inflict more serious injuries than women. However, research by the yes side states that consistent with victimization rates the results here suggest that women inflict serious injuries at least as frequently as men (Arriaga, & Oskamp, 1999). The yes side also stated men are considered more violent, because of underreporting. This is because if men report being hit or injured by a woman they will be considered less masculine, and wimpy. Police are also less likely to arrest a
Discussing the nature of the issue, violence against women includes females of all ages, race, and socioeconomic status, who are being violated through acts of physical and sexual violence, as well as psychological abuse. It is not just
The earliest literature reference to domestic violence against men can be found in the studies of Suzanne Steinmetz (1977,1978) entitled, “The Battered Husband Syndrome.” She hypothesizes that the incidents of husband-on-wife beatings rivals the incidents of wife perpetrated batterings, and that it was husband abuse not wife abuse that was underreported form of domestic violence. Steinmetz used two United States populations, a broadband nonrepresentative group and a random sample in New Castle, Delaware in the form of police reports and family surveys. The small study found only small differences in the percent of men and women who resorted to violence in the context of pushing, shoving, or hitting with hands or an object. This suggested early on that domestic violence is not a one way street. Husband beating is a serious issue and needs attention due to the fact that it is grossly underreported. Steinmetz received numerous criticism from her colleagues on this concept. In later studies, Murray Straus, Richard Gelles, and Suzanne Steinmetz (1980), authors of the book, Behind Closed Doors: Violence in The American Family, supports Steinmetz’s earlier studies in finding that women acted violently during marital affairs compared to a similar number of men who act violently in the United States. The study used 2,413 family surveys, finding in majority of them that the level of violence was a mutual or bilateral activity, with only 27% of cases finding that husbands were the
The third resource that I used is from the Office of Justice Programs/Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). A specific article titled “Intimate Partner Violence in the United States” shows a graph of intimate partner violence rates declining from 1993 to 2006. The article is quite vague, with no real description or stats stating whether or not men commit more violence against women than women do against men. “Violence between intimates is difficult to measure because it often occurs in private, and victims are often reluctant to report incidents to anyone because of shame or fear of reprisal” (S. Catalano).
Dating abuse and domestic violence are becoming increasingly prevalent in today’s society. Ten million people per year report to being abused by their partner (CDC, 2010). Due to the majority of the victims being women, however, the media often overlooks men as victims of domestic abuse. According to The National Domestic Hotline, almost 30% of men in the U.S. have experienced some form of domestic violence. Previous research has attempted to examine the different types of abuse as well as the factors that lead less men to report these incidents (James, 2003; Douglas & Hines 2011).
“Every year, in the United States there are over 3 million incidents of reported domestic violence. Every year, 4,000 victims of domestic violence are killed.” (Domestic Violence: Disturbing Facts about Domestic Violence). Domestic violence is a crime that is not just committed in the United States, but worldwide. This crime is committed every day, every hour, every minute, and every second. Anybody can be a victim or the abuser. This can happen to any child, man or woman. This is a horrific crime. Women are more likely to be the victim in domestic violence than men. “Forty-five percent of all violent attacks against female victims 12 years old and older by multiple
The document includes definitions, grants conditions, and changes to Titles I thorough XII. This gives better insight to alterations made to the policy when it was reauthorized in 2013.
This part of the dissertation will cover the similarities and differences between men and women as victims of domestic violence. The first topic that will be discussed is reporting. It can be difficult to understand or grasp the concept that men can be abused by women and nearly near the rate that women are assaulted and abused by men. In the white paper (Home Office, 2003) domestic violence was mainly described in terms of violence against women, males were largely ignored despite being acknowledged. In the white paper (Home Office 2016) things appeared to be different as male victims were acknowledged which suggests that it is becoming widely known that there is violence against men and it is being viewed as an issue. The Northern Rock Foundation concluded from their research that some males did not report partner abuse because they considered the occurrence too trivial and not worth reporting. Their research also looked into the large differences between the experiences of males and females; it was found that females were the main group to ask for help and also communicate with services. DOJ figures indicated that males are 11 percent less likely than women to report any type of violent crime that they were victims in. Ivankovich suggests that there are a number of explanations why male victims are unwilling to report. Men suffer abuse in silence because they fear that they will not be believed and people may jump to worse conclusions such as he is the perpetrator. Males
There is no question that intimate partner violence (IPV) directed against women is a fundamental issue. However, it is clear that a paradigm has been developed within the IPV literature which generally holds that it is gender-based; that perpetrators are "exclusively or disproportionately male" (Dutton., 2006) and that females are the sole victims. Whilst the original function of this paradigm was to generate social change "in a direction that righted an imbalance against women" (Dutton & Nicholls., 2005), the present result is a misinformation regarding the reality of IPV. It holds that male-perpetrated violence towards women “arises from patriarchal values which motivate men to seek to control women’s behaviour, using violence if necessary” (Bates, Graham-Kevan & Archer., 2013). It will be further explored in this essay how this claim, for the most part, has been rejected. In fact, a ‘gender neutral view’ of IPV has gradually emerged, beginning with the work of Strauss and colleagues around 30 years ago. Results from the 1985 National Family Violence Surveys (Straus & Gelles., 1986) in the USA showed that 12.1% of husbands were victims of their wife’s violence, prompting interest in this novel field. Thus Steinmetz (1977/78) proposed the existence of the ‘battered husband syndrome’; findings in her paper showed that the rates of violence between both sexes in an intimate relationship were “very similar”, with at one stage it being shown that the violence of wives
Aggression is seen through demonstration of masculinity and toughness (Cote, 2002). However in reality and empirical data do not support Cote’s statement, like in a study done in Philadelphia, where non-white females have homicide rates two to four times higher than the rates of white males as cited by Barkhuizen (2010). Due to stereotyping and the norms of the society, battery, abuse, and violence done to men are neglected and not treated as serious as battery on women.
Meta-analysis of 82 mainly US studies found women were more likely than men to use acts of physical aggression (Archer, 2000). Such studies have attracted criticism for claiming gender symmetry in partner violence and for ignoring or obscuring the meaning, nature, context, and consequences of aggressive behaviour (Dobash et al, 1992, Hagemann-White, 2001, Dasgupta 2002, Saunders, 2002). Supporters of a gender symmetry hypothesis also fail to square it with men’s disproportionate use of violence and aggressive behaviour relative to women’s, in every other sphere of life (Kimmel, 2002).
As Law students and in a male’s perspective this made me wonder how rampant domestic violence encountered by men is and how much legal and societal consideration they receive. This particular subject matter receives little attention, interpretation, and seems biased against men as will be answered discussed in this study. The research/study would identify the various reasons for male
With aggression, gender differences do exist. Men are more likely to participate in physical aggression compared to women. Although both genders equally engage in verbal abuse or aggression, women are the more emotional type, according to several research studies. According to research, biologically speaking, there are physical strength differences between men and women which heightens the notion that gender differences do in fact exist. Moreover, aggression is viewed as a trigger as a result of extreme stressors and loss of self-control (Cambell & Muncer, 1987). There are also socialcultural and evolutionary factors that play a role in aggression and gender differences, studies have
Domestic violence happens to whoever, whenever, and wherever. Activists and the public have made domestic violence a “women's issue” by pushing people to believe them and scare men victims to not speak out. Researchers and political activists claim that women and men are victimized by domestic violence in equal
In 1976, for instance, in a critique of the Curtis report (which found women less likely to assault, but as likely to murder, as men), Wilt & Bannon wrote that "nonfatal violence committed by women against men is less likely to be reported to the police than is violence by men against women; thus, women assaulters who come to the attention of the police are likely to be those who have produced a fatal result."
According to Kimmel, he states that that some women use violence as a tactic in family conflict while also understanding that men tend to use violence more instrumentally to control women’s lives. (Kimmel, 24 Researchers like Straus try to prove that women are the instigators to these physical altercation, and that creates a high amount of domestic violence. He said that according to 466 women involved in a violent relationship, their partner struck the first blow 43 percent of the cases, they hit first in 53.1 percent of the cases, and they could not