Argumentative Essay On Standardized Testing

Standardized Testing is any form of a test that is scored in a standard manner which makes it easier to compare the relative performance of students. The different types of standardized tests included the SAT, which is the scholastic assessment test which is given out by the college board, and the ACT which is American College for Testing and is administered by the national admissions test (Lieberman). These types of tests help colleges pick which students to accept and which students to deny. As useful as they seem, they aren’t all that easy to do. A huge load of time and intense studying that causes a huge amount of stress is put into these standardized tests. Students are constantly being tested and have to take trail tests to see if they

It is very important to consider the fact that standardized tests will have a lasting effect on many lives, determining which college students will attend, and essentially, the job and success they will have later in life. The SAT has changed greatly from the first time it was taken, first asking about Latin constructions while making sure it was an aptitude test, rather than an achievement test “because [be doing this, people] think [they] can give poor boys the best chance to take away the advantage of rich boys“. In the past, it was very difficult to develop tests that weren’t achievement tests because all the rich boys had a much better education where they were, giving them an unfair advantage. Standardized tests play a very important part in the lives of students and determine whether or not they get into college and where, although “Research [has] found that the SAT was a relatively poor predictor of college success compared to high school grades as well as curriculum-based achievement

Colleges don’t seem to see it that way though all they see is numbers. They look at your ACT/SAT score and your GPA and make a judgement about you based on some numbers. Junior year is the year of the ACT and I took my first ACT going totally blind into like it was some simple math test that everyone gets an A on. Big mistake, because after taking that test it was clear that I should start applying to work at McDonalds for the rest of my life. See my problem is that the ACT could not be the hardest test ever if maybe we were taught how to take this test. From grade 2 we have been taking this test so why do most people still suck at them, are we just stupid? Well, maybe some people are, but I think if teachers actually enforced the importance of those four hour tests we take then maybe we could be scoring a little higher. Honestly I don't know why you wouldn’t want to enforce standardized test. If we teach kids at a young age how to take this test, then we can have kids, be successful on this test and then they can go to big colleges and waste their parent’s money. I think that's a win win for

Standardized testing was originally introduced in China and were initially meant to help fill government jobs, fast forward a few decades, and the most famous SAT (Scholastic Aptitude Test) and the ACT(American College Testing) are used to identify which students will be the most successful in college and the future in general. These eventually became accepted as reliable source to measure a student’s academic potential and became the main “right of passage” for many college bound individuals. Essentially, if one does not do well on their SAT or ACT they will not be accepted into that university. This is a lot of stress for young students to take on and in today’s society there is a lot of questions surrounding these exams; Like how

Have you ever thought about what college you want to go to after high school? In order to get into that college, you must be accepted. Colleges look for a numerous amount of criteria in order for you to get accepted, and one of those things colleges look for is your standardized test score. The standardized test is a test administered and scored in a consistent, or “standard”, way (edglossary.org). Seeing that you must get a high enough score on the test in order for your dream college to accept you, the tests are difficult, but are very worth it at the end. Colleges have been accepting students into their school with standardized test scores for more than 50 years, and with that being said, it has seemed to work pretty well (content.time.com). In the end, standardized test scores show that you deserve to go to that college, and is also a way of showing that you’ve worked hard for so long to accomplish something huge.

No one’s future should be determined by a test. Many colleges accept students based on their test scores. Standardized test does not accurately measure student’s ability to think or learn. These tests are unfair to bad test takers, people with test anxiety, and people that weren’t encouraged to excel.

By the time a student has reached their senior year of high school, they have taken a standardized test a great number of times in order to get the score to attend their college of choice. A standardized test is any exam that is given and scored in a predetermined, standard manner. The SAT and ACT are known as standardized aptitude tests (Popham). SAT stands for Scholastic Assessment Test and ACT stands for American College Testing. The SAT was first given in 1926 and the ACT followed in 1959. Students spend hours preparing and taking these tests only to find out that their score was not good enough in order to go where they want to go. Many students then get frustrated about it and settle for a college where they are not happy.

It is true that standardized test can be used to compare students and measure students’ achievement, but standardized tests may not be as valuable as many people think it is. College Board announced that starting in 2016, the SAT will be redesigned giving more evidence that standardized tests are not to be heavily looked at while considering accepting a student for college or scholarships, therefore, I believe that standardized tests are a waste of time

Scoring a 1580 on the SAT and 35 on the ACT would grant a free pass to any of the Ivy League schools, but that’s just one of the requirements to be accepted. There’s others things, such as volunteering, GPA, sports, clubs, extracurriculars, and much, much more that colleges tend to look at when guaranteeing admission. But, the main crisis that needs to be looked upon is, whether standardized testing is effective in education, in which case, it is. Standardized testing is given to every state, where students are given the same questions on a test, but is tested by their individual ability to use their knowledge of learning to answer each question. In which, colleges would be able to compare each student by their score, received by a simple statistical

With the incredible way society has been changing over the decades, it is surprised to see the “standard” of standardized testing not change as much as people thought it would. It is sad to say, but the standard of these tests is so loose and all over the place, every college takes the SAT into consideration in an entirely different way than each other. I do not wish, however, for the standard to disappear completely. Getting into college should require some level of a standard. There should be a reward for people who do well in high school and testing. People just do not know how well they should do. The standard is no longer a straight line, but a zigzag line, going up for the standards of some schools and going down for others.

Today, colleges are relying more and more on standardized test scores. Schools are using SAT and ACT scores to create a fast and easy way to choose those applicants.

Standardized testing is a series of nationwide tests that is supposed to show a students’ achievements throughout the year. For example, the SAT is a nationwide test that Juniors in high school have to take to apply to colleges. Unless your SAT scores are between 1000 to 1600 most will not look at your application. The real question is if standardized testing is an effective way to test a student’s achievements? Standardized tests are an ineffective way to measure a students’ intelligence and academic achievements’ accordingly these tests should be changed or they should be no more.

The reasons students are required to take the standardized test is because it’s a fair, objective, and a great measure for student performance since it measures students understanding of the same required objectives, skills, and knowledge (Walberg, Herbert J). For instance, the most commonly known types of standardized tests in the USA are the SAT, the ACT, and the Medical Licensing Examination, and the uncomplicated tests include Personality Test ("Standardized Testing"). They all examine the students’ academic achievements, which will measure and compare students from all over school body, school district, and even around the world. The SAT which strictly consists of the multiple-choice exam that includes several different topics, based on logic and reasoning, series of number, and inferences. In the multiple-choice exam, there’s Reading, Writing and Language, and Math, and students are required to demonstrate their English and Mathematics proficiency skills they learned in high school. However, the ACT has four sections, including Reading, English, Science, and Math. The Medical Licensing Examination has a three-step examination for medical

Standardized tests are worthless because many students know their score can affect their future lives. For example, getting a low score on a state test can hurt your chance of getting into your dream college. These tests should not determine how smart a person is, and they certainly should not determine your future. Students are often doing anything in their ability to pass, including cheating, and even taking performance drugs prior to the test.

Another post by the New York Times, discussed how the SAT is not perfect. While there is great evidence that the SAT works for its intended purpose, David Hambrick draws out its imperfections and states that “many factors [are] not captured by the SAT – like personality, motivation and discipline – [to] contribute to success in college” (Hambrick, 2011). The SAT has great evidence of outcome after college years and even general intelligence. However, the question lies between intelligence and modifiability and its fairness in using “people’s scores on what is essentially an intelligence test to make decision that profoundly affect their lives” (Hambrick, 2011). Sarah Sheffer, journalist from PBS, further states that SAT has predictive value, but is not reliable cross populations. She states that GPA is a greater determinant for admission as it is evidence of long term “self-discipline, intellectual curiosity and hard work” (Sheffer, 2014). There is only a very small difference in GPA between SAT submitters and non-submitters, and the debate lies within school grades; if not high, testing does not guarantee college success. She states that “students with good grades and modest testing did better in college than students with higher testing and lower high school grades” (Sheffer, 2014).