preview

Assess The Difference Between Moral Thinking And Moral Acting

Decent Essays

What is the difference between moral thinking and moral acting? Moral thinking can be defined as considering doing an action but not executing it. Moral acting is having a thought or idea and executing it. For the most part, people often consider morality, where they think they must do something that is suitably correct but never actually implement their thoughts into actions. In Louise C.K. quote, Louise demonstrates the inner struggle of having moral thoughts but not being able to fulfill the intensions. Louise is conflicted on whether he should give up his seat for a soldier. Louise spends a long time thinking about what he should do and even feels pleased with himself for considering giving up his seat. In the end, Louise does not give …show more content…

Is Louise a good person just for thinking that he can do good? It is hard to classify whether a person is good or not, especially when their intensions are positive. In my opinion, I believe that everyone is born as a moral and just person. Consequently, I consider that outside sources and the environment of a person affect the goodness of that specific person. Therefore, it is hard to gauge and say that a person is “good” because most people are caring and justified. So what makes a good moral person? In my opinion, if I person has empathy towards others and shows compassion and reliability I believe that classifies the person as “good”. People who are “good” take initiative and learn and grow from others. It is important to realize, that to express goodness and morality, there must be action. Anyone can show and express sympathy but people lack empathy. Sympathy is feeling bad for someone, while empathy is understanding what the person is going through. It is extremely challenging to understand another person from their perspective, this is the reason there is so much conflict. Consequently, people cannot always be “good”. It is difficult to always be selfless and care for others and show empathy and compassion. Therefore, for me there is no such thing a perfect and ideal good …show more content…

For the most part, I think we must be open-minded and recognize different outlooks yet still be committed to our own personal morals. In the text, Thinking Critically About Ethical Issues, Ruggiero emphasizes the importance of respect. Ruggiero quotes Errol E. Harris, “every person should be regarded as worth of sympathetic consideration”(Ruggiero 78). To be a righteous and even successful person, understanding respect is critical. Ruggiero adds on by stating, “we should desire only what is really good for ourselves, so should we desire the same thing for other people because they are essentially no different from us” (Ruggiero 79). Ruggiero statement is very powerful, because it causes us to think selflessly and empathetically. I agree with Ruggiero’s idea, if we care for each other and show respect toward each other there will be a development in equality and consideration. Subsequently, it is imperative to stay genuine to your own beliefs and ideas, but being able to collaborate or even recognize someone else thoughts makes an enormous

Get Access