Assignment Peer Review

Now that your project schedule has been created and your resources have been allocated, please analyze your results and answer the following essay questions. In your

Review the PowerPoint presentation ("Program Evaluation--BPHI") for an example of a completed program design. Based on your review of the presentation and Chapter 2 of the textbook, discuss at least five different important program characteristics that must be considered when designing a program evaluation.

I hereby declare that, except where I have made clear and full reference to the work of others, this submission, and all the material (e.g. text, pictures, diagrams) contained in it, is my own work, has not previously been submitted for assessment, and I have not knowingly allowed it to be copied by another student. In the case of group projects, the contribution of group members has been appropriately quantified.

3. In at least fifty words, discuss the grade you should receive for your project. Describe what you did in order to ensure that your project was the best it could be. Include at least three specific examples or reasons to defend your position.

This is a reflection of my essay from module four where we did a peer review and feedback on our essay. I found this to be a really helpful and great assignment. It gave us an opportunity to have a peer doing the same type of essay give an outside view point. The feedback that I took into consideration from my peer was very valuable. I did not have a strong enough opposing viewpoint providing a negative view on censorship or a positive view of free speech. This was very good feedback and I feel that my peer definitely took the time to break down my essay and gave a great review. This was such an important part of the persuasive essay that the need to make sure I had a strong counter argument was important.

This assignment consists of two (2) sections: a project introduction and a project plan. You must submit both sections as separate files for the completion of this assignment. Label each file name according to the section of the assignment it is written for. Additionally, you may create and / or assume all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of this assignment.

Chapter fourteen is all about enriching the curriculum with music. This is what our lesson plan assignment is trying to teach. There are many standards that teachers have to meet and material that needs covered in the everyday classroom. Music is just another subject that needs planned for. Teachers often need help incorporating it into other lessons. A music specialist like a music teacher is an important resource for teachers to use. A music teacher can share with the teacher or teach to the students songs related to other subjects covered in the regular classroom. A music book series may have a teachers book full of ideas and songs to use. The book also suggested a website called www.songsforteaching.com which is great for finding songs.

I think that I did a pretty good job on this project because I put a lot of hard work and dedication into it. Almost everyday during class I tried to read enough of my book so that I could get one reading log done every other night. I did not execute this plan. I should have read the due dates of future checks and what all of the checks actually consisted of so that I could have planned better and would not have gotten as far behind as I did. While doing this project I feel that I could have used my time more wisely and I could have managed my work a lot better than I did. On the Global Context parts of the project I feel like I did a very good job on them because I picked a perfect Global Context that I think represents the book better than

I am sending a peer evaluation form, and I would like to ask you to keep the information for yourself. Some people will not understand certain things if you try to talk to them about our work, and I really don't want to have problems with anybody, as I will have to work with them for the next two semesters. I wouldn't probably even fill out the form if it's not required because I'm emotionally drained and tired of some people from my group's behaviors. However, I do understand that some of them have experienced serious problems, and that might have caused their difficulties with either organization or timely work.

The peer review on my report form help me to get off to a good start for the rest of the report form. I got a suggestion to expand on the type of people that companies would look for if an applicant that did not have a college degree. I expanded on this by saying “If the company does not require you to have a degree they will be looking for you to have good interpersonal skills and a substantial work history”. This addition made my job requirements easier to understand. I also discovered through peer review that I failed to mention any statistics about Pi Sigma Epsilon. So, I decided to include this fact “Ninety-six percent of Pi Sigma Epsilon members have internships for the summer”. This made both of the organizations seem more even.

When I’m revision my draft I take all the comments I got from my peer response group. After changing the sentences and details my group wanted to fix/add, I take it to my friends outside of English and ask what else can I improve on for the drafts. Next, finally more feedback I reprint the paper and put the drafts side by side and see more details I can get rid or add, and after the process, I reread the paper out loud and see what flows and doesn’t flow together. Overall, I print two drafts to make sure I get almost everything I wanted to flow and tie together.

In our project we worked diligently and completed the assignment in good time. Some positive aspects of the assignment were the fact that me and my partner worked well together and shared the tasks equally, we would've liked to complete the writing portion of the assignment quicker so we could work on raising money for a longer period of time. In addition at the start of the assignment it seemed like a large task but once started there was less difficulty. Me and my partner Dylan worked well together as we are friends, we each did equal work which was not up to standard. Something to include next time in our group would maybe be some more creativity so we could have raised more money or an enhanced essay, we did not encounter any obstacles.

In the fast developing world of electronics and the World Wide Web, anyone can reach information and data available just by a finger click. In the same manner, anyone can upload any theory or program anywhere in the world of computer data, stating and claiming that such and such is a valid well-functioning program or theory. How can we distinguish what is working and what is not? The same way, nursing programs and research can be readily available with any information we are looking for. One way we can sort through them is using what is called “peer review system”. In this paper, I will answer five question brought forth by the CDC Evaluation Working Group.

Evaluate the possible solutions using a simple decision making technique to arrive at the best solution. Your evaluation should include human, material and financial resources.

Working with my peers throughout my program and thesis process has been instrumental to my education. My analysis of my peers work and the critiques I received from them expanded my understanding of my own work and the writing process. The peer review process has contributed to my education by causing me to probe more deeply and examine more thoroughly.