preview

Baby Boomers Case Study

Decent Essays

Hawkesbury
Baby Boomers: Phil and Stacy
For the baby boomer males of Hawkesbury and in this case Phil, the subject’s total accumulated superannuation fund after deflation would amount to $187,120.09. However, 3 years after Phil’s retirement his superannuation would’ve ran out and he will be faced with relying on the pension for 17 years until his death.
Moreover the baby boomer females of Hawkesbury and in this case Stacy would have accumulated a total deflated superannuation of $130,122.14 at the point of retirement. She could rely on this fund for 3 years, the same as a male Hawkesbury baby boomer, however she will have to depend on the pension for a longer period of 20 years due to the longer life expectancy of female compared to male. …show more content…

Tom will have accumulated a total deflated superannuation of $435,677 at the point of retirement and would enjoy is fund for 8 years before having to rely on the pension. His time in poverty of 10 years would be considerable less than a baby boomer male due to Tom’s greater amount of accumulated superannuation.
Moving on, a generation X female of the Hawkesbury area would have accumulated a deflated superannuation of $302,967.06 which is $172,844.92 more than a baby boomer female in the Hawkesbury LGA. Again this is because of Katie’s income being exposed to the benefits of compulsory super contributions therefore her fund will last her for 9 years before she has to rely on the pension for 13 years. …show more content…

This is $210,717.47 more than the generation X males of the Hawkesbury LGA because the Leichhardt LGA receives a higher average income meaning greater contributions to superannuation. Vincent will enjoy his retirement fund for 9 years which is one year greater than Tom of the Hawkesbury LGA and his time relying on the pension is one years less at 9 years.
Finally, a generation X female in the Leichhardt LGA will accumulate a greater amount of superannuation due to higher earnings than Hawkesbury LGA. At retirement Rachael will receive $449,271.67 in superannuation which is $146,304.61 more than a generation X female from Hawkesbury LGA. Surprisingly Rachael’s fund will last for 8 years after retirement, 1 years less than a generation X from Hawkesbury and her time in poverty is for 14 years which is also 1 years more. This could be a result of female receiving less income than male therefore her lack of income growth cannot maintain her higher cost of living than a generation X Hawkesbury female after

Get Access