preview

Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention

Decent Essays

This essay offers perspective in response to the question, “Do you think that it is fair to prevent certain people from filing for Chapter 7? Why or why not?” Accordingly, the points of view expressed take into consideration the historical context of bankruptcy in the United States, contributing factors to the inequities of our economic environment as well as the actors who ultimately benefit from the passage of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, specifically as it relates to its imposed limitations through implementation of the means test. To begin, the name of the 2005 legislation is somewhat misleading. That is to say, the verbiage, “Consumer Protection” implies the legislation intends to serve consumers, …show more content…

Consider this: The sub-prime market was at its peak at the millennium, consequently, the majority of sub-prime “interest only” loans carried 5 and 7-year adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs), meaning the adjustable mortgage rates would apply at the end of the 5 and/or 7 year mark. Furthermore, the explosion of the housing market in the years 2000 through 2003 coupled with rapidly increasing home prices perpetuated the sentiment of many people, “if I don’t buy a house now, I’ll never be able to afford one”, ergo, high demand. Also, it has been popularly hypothesized that various large financial institutions and several legislators held an extraordinarily bold level of confidence that homeowners wouldn’t default on their mortgages, therefore they continued to manipulate the market, generating massive profits for sub-prime lenders and investors. The monthly mortgage for a home purchased between the years 2000 through 2003, with a 5 or 7 year ARM, would drastically balloon in the years 2005, 2007, 2008 and 2010 respectively. With that being said, it’s my personal belief that the methodical construction of the 2005 bankruptcy legislation has specific intentions for imposing limitations on individuals who were facing the dilemma of either paying their mortgage, or paying down consumer debt at the expiration of their “no interest” terms in the years 2005 through 2008; thus, preventing people from filing bankruptcy in an effort to escape financial ruin. Or, in the cases of Chapter 7 qualifications using the means test, debtors were required to surrender their homes to their lender. In addition to the implementation of the means test are the restrictions on the Homestead Exemption, which further exacerbates equity issues and likely increases

Get Access