What if the America led by Barack Hussein Obama and his administration at no time subsisted? How would the USA appear to be like currently? Naturally, society will not ever know, indubitably. Furthermore, for the GOP who avows Obama has been a catastrophe for their nation, who blaspheme that American culture would be extremely superior if merely John McCain and Sarah Palin were voted in 2008, in any case, one should truly assess that assertion. Principally, it is imperative to comprehend that, McCain is essentially adjacent to Obama on an entirety of concerns than he is with what he cries as RINOs (Republican In Name Only), such as Ted Cruz and Rand Paul, the contemporary beloveds of the Republican Party. All the same, if McCain had stood as America’s commander-in-chief, things would have been considerably dissimilar.
Initially, there would be no Affordable Healthcare Act. Also, there would not have occurred an upsurge election in 2010 that sped the GOP into authority in the House, and the Tea Party would have most likely never have happened. Moreover, The Republican party undoubtedly would have lost foundation in the 2010-midterm elections. From the time of the second Great War, there have been various US commanders, generally, when they departed from the Oval Office, their faction would be defeated.
The partisan gridlock that has crippled Washington D.C. throughout the Obama years would in spite of everything subsist beneath an America of John McCain. Perhaps it could
In 2004, Obama walked up to the podium at the Democratic National Convention as a political novelty. The speech he delivered established Obama as a natural leader and transformed him into a future presidential candidate. Rich in demonstrative rhetoric, its purpose was to unite the American people through nationalism. The exploration of his rhetoric and style throughout this paper will cement why the speech was beneficially identity transforming for Obama's political career.
Obama was elected in 2008; how do you think people will explain this time period 100 years from now? How do you think this time period is similar to or different from other eras in American history?
On July 27th, 2004 Barack Obama gave a influential and significant speech that is remains to be talked about ten years later. This speech took place at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago. Obama, speaking on the side of most democrats, specified that the John Kerry/John Edwards duo would be the greatest selection to assist in leading America down a greater road. The speech ended in rounds of applause and was both praised and discussed all across America. He used pathos as a means of relating to the greater audience and touches their hearts.
The 2016 Presidential election has got to be the most aggressive yet entertaining election of all time. Who would have ever thought that Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton would be the two candidates running for President? This election has got everyone, everywhere riled up over who will win the campaign. Citizens of the United States could argue that neither one of the candidates running, is fit to be Commander and Chief. It has come to the point in this election where citizens are not engaging in voting for President, because of the candidates running. Due to the lack of participates voting, I believe that Senator John McCain would better qualify as President because he is a diplomat, he has a strong military background, he’s had years of experience and is a
Both McCain and Obama have impressive resumes when viewed objectively. They are both committed to protecting and defending the United States against both foreign and domestic
The 2008 campaign was rife with racist imagery and attacks, but in fairness this divisiveness was present in both the Democratic and Republican parties. The “Birther Movement,” which claims that President Obama was not born in Hawaii but instead in Kenya, or another muslim state, and frequently claims that the former President is secretly a muslim. This case in many ways is the culmination of the issue facing “The Party Decides,” because John McCain, now the Republican nominee after falling short eight years before, struck down notions that then Senator Obama was foreign born, Muslim, or an Arab.This was not an easy
blocks of this great nation would not have existed. Our Constitution and its amendments have been the
He would have paved a road for equal rights. There would’ve been reconstruction that leaded us to voting rights, economic integration, and much more. He also wanted amnesty, and equal rights. He also wanted people to have integrity. America would’ve been much stronger.
Peggy Noonan’s editorial The Loneliest President Since Nixon, published in the Wall Street Journal, showed high disregard for President Obama’s actions. The main purpose of her piece was prove that President Obama is an ineffective president. Noonan’s tone is quite mocking and condescending, referring to Obama not as the president but simply “Mr. Obama,” and often ridiculing his actions and way of speaking. She is critical of his actions such as his executive order on immigration, and believes that he truly does not know what to do when faced with resistance. From her tone the readers get the impression that Noonan strongly disapproves of our president and seems to feel he is incompetent.
George .W. Bush and Barrack Obama two of America’s great presidents, both filled with their individual ambitions and charisma. These prominent presidents have ruled the most powerful country in the world using their different strategies and policies. George Bush, a republican was the 43rd president of America had two terms in power (cite). On the other hand Barrack Obama the first black president of America and a democrat was his successor. He is known for his charisma. Notwithstanding, their various good leadership skills and the criticisms, Obama has been a better and more successful president United States than George Bush. Despite the fact that his presidency being criticized for being a failure he has done a good job so far. Obama is showing promise in his policies trying fix the problems that were created by past American presidents in terms of handling the domestic and foreign policies.
In the beginning of the article we are given a visual of a country in economic ruin as Ronald Reagan begins his presidency. James Davidson Hunter wrote the article to give readers a greater insight, from a seemingly unbiased and constructive viewpoint. Throughout history each American era has been consumed by different ideals and viewpoints. These viewpoints can either bring a nation together or destroy them. Different groups have affected different decisions. A president's job is to remain objective and to listen to the citizens as well as make some hard decisions that are in their best interests. Many groups have been and will continue to be affected, “It is this face - the face of a pervasive anxiety about the future - that seeks some modicum of control in the “culture wars” (page 3).
Throughout the history of these great United States of America, the country has always possessed something truly unique: the fundamental principle of being for and by the people. This dynamic has lasted throughout the 241 year history of the United States being an independent nation. Whether it was the American Revolution led by George Washington, the Louisiana Purchase of Thomas Jefferson, the freeing of the slaves by Abraham Lincoln, or even through the grimmer times of the Great Depression, we have always remained strong due to great leadership (“The history of the United States,” 2016). However, as time has passed, both major parties, the Republicans and the Democrats, have become increasingly polarized in their conquest for power. This remains true to this day, as the United States is in the midst of its current presidential election cycle, with the ultimate goal of a strong 45th President of the United States of America.
“Let us not seek the Republican answer or the Democratic answer, but the right answer. Let us not seek to fix the blame for the past. Let us accept our own responsibility for the future,” quoted by John F. Kennedy at the Loyola college alumni banquet. E.J. Dionne is a political journalist and commentator for The Washington Post also a University Professor in the Foundations of Democracy and Culture at the McCourt School of Public Policy. In Dionne’s book, “Our Divided Political Heart,” he talks about how American citizens cannot agree on who we are because we cannot agree on whom we have been. The American custom, Dionne expresses, points not to be self-sufficient and selfish, but to even out our compassion of individual freedom and our loyalty to the public. Understanding of our nation’s history, Dionne shows an insightful examination of how self-reliance is toxic to our present political ambience. He participates the Tea Party’s involvement with American history, but also shows it’s catastrophic past while supporting the Wall Street movement in America’s public and Populist traditions.
“Mr. Conservative”, Barry Goldwater ushered in the modern conservative movement in the United States in the mid 1950’s running on a platform of individual freedom, a government based upon the constitution and individual responsibility. He has been called “the most consequential loser” of an American Presidential race to LBJ in 1964 started as it signaled a change to conservative politics that would eventually end half a century of liberal control in the US political landscape. Goldwater’s policies became the conservative platform of defense, welfare and limited government.
Introduction: Barack Obama was re-elected as President of the U.S on November 6th, 2012. Barack Obama held his Victory Speech on the following day. This essay will analyze and comment on an excerpt of that exacting Victory Speech and the solution focus of the criticism will be on the Rhetorical belongings of the Speech. By using numerous forms of Rhetorical apparatus like Anaphora or Tautology, Barack Obama controls to offer a Speech that is full of American thoughts of life, similar to the American promise, the American Dream and the outlook. The Speech is very alike to the one he did in 2008 at the Democratic meeting, and contains numerous forms of replication and between the outline political views.