preview

Bartolome De Las Casas Just War Essay

Decent Essays

During the conquest of the new world, the idea of varied culture was far from the minds of the Spanish exploring the Americas . This lack of thought for other definitions of normal allows modern readers to better understand the debate of the time: the moral obligations associated with subjugation and conversion. Two Spanish theologians, Bartolomé de las Casas and Juan Gines de Sepulveda, thought that their specific means for carrying out the tasks of evangelization and colonization were superior to the other. Though no clear winner of the dispute over a “just war” was declared, their argumentation continues to be discussed due to its relevancy. Sepulveda, a theologian who had never before interacted with the Native Americans inhabiting the …show more content…

He states that the displays of the Spanish to convert through war, and their later exploitation of cheap labor, under the premise of saving the few innocents in harms way was not enough to call for war against a peaceful people, many of whom would be lost in the process. De Las Casas’ passionate argument utilized the same secular philosopher as Sepulveda. He claimed improper assumption of barbarianism and natural law. De Las Casas strove to make connections between the actions of the native peoples and rational logic, though it is interesting to see a secular argument used to support a religious cause. For example, human sacrifice was utilized to show that not only were the natives turned towards a higher power, but that they were willing to quite literally sacrifice “the most precious gift”, human life, for their deity. Finally, de Las Casas argues that war is not just due to the fact that until they accept the Catholic faith, their souls are outside of the papal jurisdiction. Thus, de Las Casas’ emotional argument towards Sepulveda’s points sheds light on the varying opinions of the time in

Get Access