Bombing Of Hiroshima Pros And Cons

Satisfactory Essays
This is one of the many arguments meant to support the bombing of Hiroshima. The conclusion of the argument is obvious- The nuclear bomb should be used against Hiroshima. What is the rest of the argument? Are there any premises missing from this paragraph? Why or why not? When reading only the initial paragraph, the argument is invalid. Again, there are no supporting facts to the argument. However, after referring to the source, as cited, and reading the entire article, one may draw a different conclusion, but a different conclusion can only be determined after the reading the entire argument, not just the paragraph.
Get Access