Introduction The book of Collins (2001) entitled Good to Great became one of the best seller not because of the attractiveness written in it but because of its ability to inspire the people through reminding them on how to struggle against the tendencies and aid the individuals in setting a higher standard toward greatness. The author manages to show the different sides of philosophical sides which also attracted a lot of criticisms that tend to examine the significant implications of the book in determining the future of an organization. The impression that the book received is derived n particular about the author's idea about the leadership and the position of the organizations within the industry and the greatness of an organization in the midst of competitive environment. Despite of the number of criticism it received, there still a good point that the book delivers for its readers. This paper intended to develop an argumentative research regarding the teachings of Collins' book "Good to Great". In order to recapitulate the ideas involved in the research, there are objectives that need to consider. First, is to examine the philosophical assumptions involved and underpin with the research and methodology established in the book of Collins. Second is to explain the practical significance of the assumptions and their effect on the research's applicability. Third is to relate the assumptions and research methodology to the readings, including different observations on
William James is recognized to be the most interesting and inspiring of philosophers in the US, and the second of the three prominent pragmatists. James engineered a philosophy deepened by his psychological proficiency and a philosophy that was rich in philosophical ramifications by evading the plausibly rigid systems of the European rationalists. In the essay written by William James “What Makes a Life Significant,” I formulated three philosophical questions that most readers will relate to as they read the context. The first question is: Are men’s lives leveled up as well as leveled down? The second question is: Is not one man as good as another? The third question is: What is the meaning of an Ideal? This paper will analyze and discuss the
Good management and leadership are essential for organizations to operate and additionally for the businesses to prosper. When businesses are well administered, they can function successfully and they can function effectively. Managers have exceptionally effective and strong plans, mangers have systematized structures, organizations, and they also assess effects. When businesses are appropriately directed, they acclimate to modifications in the situation and cultivate cultures that encourage obligation and improvement. Mutually good management and good leadership are essential to maintain organizational performance.
In Book 1, he defines the best and most sought after human good as happiness. After discussing and reinforcing his concept of happiness as the most desired and best good, and the goal of a human life, the discussion segues into an examination of virtue and the rest of the work.
These individuals are known to be experts of morality. The chapter proposes two reasons as to why these individuals are called upon so frequently. One, for those who believe and have some sort of religious back round, and second, for those who believe in what is called a “scientific view” of the world. This chapter presents the idea that there is some popular belief that religion and morality go hand in hand and that in order to understand morality, you must understand religion. It is explained that when we view morality from a religious perspective, we give meaning to morality in a way that a “good man” made this world that we currently live in and that we are his children. While the book proposes the question that people who believe in God, or a higher power, base their values on what those religions state is right or wrong, whereas for an atheist the question still remains; how do these individuals weigh their moral compass and place their values?
The idea of striving for goodness has always been something that has been instilled in our minds since birth. We were always taught to the do the right thing. But why? What are the benefits of being a good person versus being bad? This is question that Colin Mcginn tackles in his article, “Why Not Be a Bad Person?” In it, he explains why he think virtue is the more intriguing moral standard, and explores why some people may disagree with him.
Therefore, there is good and bad in all of us, though the things that can be seen as “bad” in one view may be considered “good” in another, as with Mrs Mossop and her gossip. Also, bad or bad habits don’t last forever and can be changed, like Joseph’s impulsive and judgemental behaviours, or Tom Leyton’s initial coldness, and we should strive to learn more about people before declaring them a “good” or “bad”
From the point of view of the external environment, the effectiveness of organization would gain much more support when the company do the business with their consumers and suppliers, due to the company has provided a wonderful environment for the employees (Businessweek, 2007). Obviously, when the company’s reputations has been known and improved because
If we believe the premise that we are created in God's image then it should be stated that man is inherently good. Babies do not come into this world intent on doing bad. We want pleasure in our lives and in the pleasure of others and that comes from doing good. Good is defined amongst other things as "morally excellent” (XXXXXXX). #1 Sure, there are those who do evil but those paths are choices that they made later in life. This paper will be used to prove that man is inherently good through John F. Kennedy based on the fact that he served his country, used his privileged life to help him become President and his numerous accomplishments.
There is no such thing as “absolute good” but “good for”. Whenever I meet my defining moment, I think about the question, “Whose good should I be serving?” I am not saying to evaluate whose interests are more valuable, but to evaluate whose interests are more important TO ME. There are three principles for me to evaluate different interests. The first is the interest’s indirect impact on the third party. For example, the police are investigating a theft and I know who the thief is. I must
This paper is a book report on the novel entitled The Goal written by Eliyahu Goldratt and Jeff Cox. The 40-chapter book is actually a business book written in the form of a novel that makes it interesting to read unlike other business textbook. As a novel, the book is entertaining but at the same time, very informative for management or accounting students as well as for the real-life company managers and CEOs who wanted to apply different managerial practices. The paper summarizes the novel and makes analyses in relation to Operations Management.
To transform a good company to great company is all manages' dream, but only few of them make it. To find out the core factors which lead to a good company became a great company is very difficult, because in different era, different industry companies face different opportunities and threats. To begin the research for the Good-to-Great study, Jim Collins and his research team searched for companies that: performed at or below the general stock market for at least fifteen years; then at a transition point began to pull away from the competition, and sustained returns of at least 3 times the general market for the next fifteen years. He started with a list of 1,435 companies and found eleven that met his criteria.
Good to Greatoutlines a model for turning a good, average or even mediocre company in to a great one. The book includes a useful model which brings all the theory together in a meaningful and memorable way. By bringing together disciplined people, using disciplined thought and disciplined action companies can build up and breakthrough the barriers that hold them back from greatness.
In James Rachels’ book, The Elements of Moral Philosophy, he expresses ideas within the concluding chapter, “What Would a Satisfactory Moral Theory be like?” that lay an silhouette of every moral approach we have discussed so far and compounding it into a final discussion with a couple of final contentions towards a comprehensive understanding of morality and the approaches we can make as moral guides to make decisions that are virtuous for each class without exception. Rachels’ gives thoughtful perspective on all subjects that we have learned about and makes final accumulations for the way we can decide to use these for our own benefit. While then expressing the virtues we must value for ourselves to have a best plan, and the ways our choices can help others in a positive aspect.
Jim Collins and his research team have done a wonderful job identifying what it takes for a company to go from good to great. I found this book extremely interesting and would like to share several of my thoughts. The study looks at companies that appeared on the Fortune 500 from the years of 1965 to 1995, looking for those that, for 15 years, either tracked or underperformed the stock market, followed by a transition, and subsequently returning at least 3 times the stock market for at least 15 years. The eleven companies included in the
Chapter 2 Harvard Press Book (2006). Performance management: Measure and improve the effectiveness of your employees. (Chapter 2) Motivation: The Not-So-Secret Ingredient of High Performance. Harvard Business School Publishing. Cambridge, MA. Lynn, I., Hodge, Y. & Yemen G. (2007). Teamwork turmoil. University of Virginia Darden School Foundation. Beamish, P. & Jiang, R. & (2011). The Chinese fireworks industry. Richard Ivey School of Business Foundation. Kaplan, R.S. (2010). Leading change with strategy execution system. Harvard Business School Publishing. Cambridge, MA. Karkhardt, D. & Hanson, J. (1993). Informal networks: The company behind the charts. Harvard Business School Publishing. Cambridge, MA. Katzenbach, J. & Smith, D. (1993). The discipline of team. Harvard Business Review. President and Fellows of Harvard College. Kerr, S. (1995). On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Executive. 9 (1), 7-14 Download on class site Kramer, R.M. (2003). The harder they fall. Harvard Business School Publishing. Cambridge, MA. Montgomery, C.A. (2005). Newell Company: Corporate Strategy. Harvard Business School Press.