preview

Bosnian War Case Study

Decent Essays

strongly against the Vance-Owen plan. If Clinton was not bounded by the NATO alliances, it would have been rational for Clinton to dismiss the alternative. Lifting of arms-embargo also demonstrates how Clinton was bounded. By the time the United States government came to a consensus for military intervention, lifting of arms-embargo seemed to be the most rational actions. It would give Bosnian Muslims ability to defend themselves. This way, not as many American troops would be needed in Bosnia (Ullman, 1996). The United States could not enforce ‘lift and strike’ plan because there were British and French peacekeepers in Bosnia. If arms embargo disappeared, the peacekeepers will be put into higher danger. Once again, the need to keep the European alliance limited the United States from carrying out the most rational decision.

American public and domestic reputation also limited Clinton’s decisions. This is most apparent in Clinton’s decision to exit Bosnian war. When American troops entered Bosnia, Clinton decided to plan a clear exit strategy and limit the troops’ stay to a year (Daalder, 2000). This decision was heavily influenced by his political reputation. With the presidential election one year away, Clinton did not want to provide the …show more content…

Allison writes that there are definitely multiple governments at play in regards to the Bosnian war. The complexity of joint action led to some undesirable consequences: tremendous loss of casualty of UN peacekeepers and Bosnian Muslims. Allison talks about how the European governments, the United States’ government, and international organizations such as UN and NATO consider each other when developing their policies (Allison, 1996). It is the government model in that there are different governments influencing each others’ decision-making processes; however, Allison also makes the

Get Access