preview

Boston Marathon Bombing: A Case Study

Better Essays

Every day our police departments work very hard to keep us safe using a variety of procedures that most everyday people don’t know about. These procedures can include DUI checkpoints, interrogations, fingerprinting, and indictments. This paper will go over some of these procedures in a particular case that involved so many different ones. The case I will be discussing is the Boston Marathon Bombing, The local, state, and federal agents worked together around the clock to identify, locate, and apprehend the suspects responsible for the bombing. Also in the paper I will go over what I think the police could have done better or what I would have changed in the situation, then I will critically analyze and debrief the situation.
April 15, 2013 …show more content…

You would think this would be a very successful tactic but it was terribly unsuccessful that led to misidentification and not identifying the suspects as fast as need be. Even though the FBI had driver licenses photos, passport photos, and a mugshot of one of the suspect’s prior incidents they still could not identify the suspects with their 1 billion dollar software. “Boston FBI agent Kieran Ramsey said. “It was only good to compare driver’s license and passport photos to other driver’s license and passport photos” (Ross, 2016). For a billion dollar software I would expect that the taxpayer dollars would be able to do more than just compare passports and driver licenses to each other. This mishap proves that the police force shouldn’t always rely solely on computers. Humans are still better at some aspects of the job. One thing I would have done differently is instead of just having computers determine the suspect make sure it is triple checked by professionals. A major lesson learned from the incident was that you can never rely solely on technology. Like I said earlier you must take all information you get seriously, but in the case of when it comes from technology you must get more background information. Is the person you identified affiliated with any terrorist groups or on any watch list do have any type of criminal record involving violence. A problem I had with this situation is the fact that this technology was untested and unproven they should have known from the start that this technology only had the power to compare passports and driver license to each other, instead of wasting time investigating people that had no involvement in the crime. (Ross,

Get Access