Boy Meets Girl Ricky Analysis

The determination of gender identity is much deeper than whether a person is born a male or a female. The exact identifier that separates gender identity is currently unknown but researchers believe that genetics, hormones, reproductive organs, biological, and environmental factors all play a role in distinguishing a person’s gender identity. A person’s physical gender and their sense of gender are formed at two different times in two different parts of the body. A person’s gender is whether they are born male or female, but the way they identify themselves may be the opposite, which is not uncommon and has occurred since the beginning of time. In culture males are known to be the stronger, more aggressive sex, while females are the

Butler initially observes that the culturally constructed as well as maintained nature of performance of gender are fairly based on the uncontentious as well as widely expounded idea of feminist theory stating that cultural expressions of gender which constitute the cultural manifestations of biological truth cannot be taken at face value. Butler proposes the concept of differences in sex is a construction of heterosexuality ideologically designed to legitimize as well as normalize its existence. Butler notes that manifestations of split as male and female are creations in a self-legitimizing heterosexuality which is also hegemonic. Butler claims that the coherence of either gender namely man or woman is internal requiring a heterosexuality which is stable as well as oppositional. Heterosexuality which is institutional requires as well as produces univocity I each of the terms gendered constituting limits of gender possibilities inside an oppositional along with binary gender system. The concept of gender presuppose a relationship which is causal among sex, desire as well as gender but also suggests that desire reflects and expresses gender and vice versa. The uity of these three factors are metaphysical ad is truly known as well as expressed in desire differentiating a oppositional gender which is a form of heterosexuality said to be oppositional. Butler’s argument on

In “ Performing Gender Identity: Young Men’s Talk and the Construction of Heterosexual Masculinity” by Deborah Cameron portray a very controversial theory in which Judith Butler discusses the idea of gender performativity. Butler clearly states that gender must constantly be reaffirmed and publicly displayed for gender rules to be maintained. This excerpt hints to the main idea illustrating that one’s sex is biological, but gender is constructed, learned, and performed. The main idea behind the term gender performativity is that, gender itself exists only as it is established and repetitively performed in society.

Judith Butler argues that gender becomes ´real´ by a person unconsciously acting in ways that are accepted to be “masculine” or “feminine” and that even biological sex is a product of culture.

Judith Butler (Gender Trouble, 1990) argues that rather than sex determining gender-gender determines sex. Sex is shaped by gender discourses which give us scripts to perform according to whether we are biologically classed as male or female. The continual performance of these scripts on a daily basis is what makes us male or female. The classic example of this is the third sex, yes, the third sex and that is the transgender( born male in a female’s body or

A person’s sex is determined on the basis of three fundamental human physiognomies, chromosomes (XX for a female and XY for a male), gonads (ovaries for females and testes for males) and the obvious being genitals (vagina for a females and a penis for males). However socially, gender identity is formulated on the grounds of stereotypical roles from both

The ‘traditional’ heterosexual approach assigns a certain gender to a certain sex in an act of “expropriation or appropriation.” Expropriation means to give up all control. This suggests that the sex of an individual governs their gender. Or, in other words, gender is powerless. The argument is invalid because there is a spectrum of femininity and masculinity. For example, there are not just “girls” (sex). There can be “girly-girls” and “Tom boys.” This spectrum is administered by gender so it cannot be without any influence on an individual. The argument of appropriation poses a similar error. Appropriation means to take as one’s own property. “Gender is the rightful property of sex,” which implies gender belongs to sex. In the ‘traditional’ sense, this means “masculine” belongs to male and “feminine” belongs to female.” Once again, it is assumed that gender is inferior to sex. Yet, it is still possible for males to have “feminine” practices and vice versa for females and “masculine” practices, thus inferring quite the opposite. Gender appears to be superior to sex in many cases. Both the idea of expropriation and appropriation link sex and gender to each other. However, because the notions have fallacies, gender cannot have a perfect connection to sex which it the point Butler is trying to

Butler’s overarching idea throughout her essay is that becoming a gender is not done through linguistics but rather action – specific focus to the body. From the beginning of the essay, Butler makes the distinction between gender and sex very clear. Gender is plainly a social construct and the gender you choose to associate with is developed through repeated actions. Sex rather, is anatomic; your internal bodily organs and reproductive systems define it.

There are several sources that tell a person how to be a man or woman. Science tells us by recognizing the X or Y chromosomes. The media shows us through the physically ideal celebrities that grace the covers of magazines and flaunt their bodies in commercials. Sports, wrestling, cars, and blue for the boys. Dresses, make-up, painted nails, and pink for the girls. All of these sources, as well as others, have evolved into an expectation that has become institutionalized within society. This expectation, is placement and belonging into the binary system of person: the man or the woman. In Anne Fausot-Sterling's acrticles “The Five Sexes” and the “The Five Sexes, Revisited”, the

4. Butler's argument about the constant and daily performative nature of gender holds the public accountable for requiring that people enact gender. How do you think gender would change if it were no longer determined by its ability to pass the judgment of

Even though, the concept behind gender is understandable; however, gender is many times perceive as the sex of the person. However, that is not the case because in truth gender is demonstrated as the act of portraying the sex after birth. When children are born, they are given a gender: male or female. However, this gendering of children is based by their genital parts rather than their being. The gendering of children demonstrates a different meaning than what most people will perceive it as.

Judith Butler questions the belief that behaviors of either sex are natural. She proposes a rather radical theory that gender is performative and that sex is constructed. When gender is being performed, it means that someone would take on a role, acting in such a way that gives society the idea of their gender and constructs part of their identity. To be performative means that we produce a series of effects.Gender is constructed and is not in any way connected ‘naturally’ to sex.

In this essay I discuss that "doing gender means creating differences between girls and boys and women and men...." (West & Zimmerman 2002:13) I am concentrating on the female perspective, how societyputs forth expectations of what is 'natural' or biological even though, in some cases, it can be quite demeaning and degrading. I am using some examples from the local media and also a few childhoodexperiences that have helped me to now strongly suspect that the quote from Simone Beauvoir (1972) "One is not born a woman, but rather becomes one" most likely has quite a bit of truth to it.

Biology is the real that usually trumps gender. With Butler disagreeing with this statement and saying that a person’s sex is socially constructed it can be seen as her attacking the biological truth that society has come to believe. “Butler describes a heterosexual matrix in which “proper men” and “proper women” are identified as heterosexual” (Butler 519). When the sex of a baby is found out, it is expected to act like its gender. There is an assumption that if you are born female you will be a woman in which you are expected to be feminine and attracted to men. If you are born male it is assumed that you will be a man therefore you must be masculine and attracted to women. People who are queer challenge this norm that society has followed for years, “Butler maintains that discrimination against gays is a function not of their sexuality but of their failure to perform heterosexual gender norms” (Butler;

Gender is a performance according to Judith Butler . All bodies, she claims, are gendered from birth; sometimes even earlier now we can determine sex in the womb . For Butler society dictates ones gender and the individual reinforces that gender through performance . “The deeds make the doer” in Butler’s words; there is no subject prior to performance. Butler’s concept of gender, however, leads us to question: what of those who are incapable of performing the gender ascribed to them? If one is unable to perform are they left genderless, lacking subjectivity and social identity? If no human is without gender , as Butler claims, then where does this leave her theory? Either gender is more than simply performance or one can exist without