Bystander's Intervention

Everyday humans are presented with new opportunities and situations. These events can change the way they think and make decisions. But it's the way it can change ones relationships that can really hurt one's ability to care. There is a total of 7.442 billion people alive today. Yet only a small portion of that are people one truly cares about. For many people, a specific setting, situation or emotion can alter the way people can think rationally.

In the book Bystander, Eric, the protagonist, was a bystander, who noticed about bullying but, never did anything about it. Eric learned to take action for what is right to prevent from bullying and not be a bystander. As Eric realized that he was a bystander, he learned to stand up and confront the bullies.

In the book “Bystander by James Preller the main character Eric is a thirteen year old 7th grade boy who faces difficulties that change him as a person and how he views things. Eric’s parents get divorced causing his little brother Rudy, his mom and himself to move to Long Island from Ohio. Eric’s mom then enrolls Eric into a new school in which he does not fit into and he when he eventually fits in he finds the wrong friends.

“What hurts the victim most is not the cruelty of the oppressor, but the silence of the bystander.” -Elie Wiesel

What is the “Good Samaritan rule and when does it apply. A “Good Samaritan is an individual who usually goes out of their way to help someone or somebody in a time of need. This can be carried out in the time of an emergency on a voluntary basis. Under this rule a person is not legally obligated to render aid to someone unless they are in unconscious state and cannot respond.

This essay will ‘compare and contrast’ two approaches made in investigating the ‘bystander effect’. It will discuss in some depth as to what exactly is meant by the bystander effect, illustrating when this concept was first shown and why. An outline will be made of the different methods used, those being experiments and discourse analysis, explaining each one in turn, within the framework of two cases. The first being the murder of ‘Catherine Genovese,’ 1964.and the second ‘James Bulger’ 1993. The essay will then show examples of the differences and similarities between each method. Concluding with a summary of findings into the two approaches to investigating the Bystander Effect.

Bystander. What does this word mean? Bystander is an individual who witnesses an event that place. There is active bystander and a nonactive bystander. An active bystander is an individual who witnesses an event take place and steps in to help. That stepping in to help could be calling 911, defending an individual, checking up on an individual who does not look okay, etc. A nonactive bystander is an individual who witnesses an event take place and ignores it and goes on about their day. I recently had the opportunity to participate in an scholar-citizen initiative engagement called Bystander Training, which was presented by a representor from the SAVES office at Radford University.

In the book "Bystander", written by James Preller, it talks about not just the bully and victims but the other roles, such as Bystanders and allies. In chapter 20, a gathered group of boys discuss their responses to Griffin's unreasonable and illogical behavior. Their reasons for doing nothing include "The unreliability of authority figures to respond", "The threat of retaliation", "The victim, at least on some level, deserves it" , "It is human nature, the law of the jungle, and it will always persist", "It's better to stay out of it", "No one should rat out another student". These are ridiculous and absurd reason to be a bystander to such a unspeakable act. The main idea I would like to another reader to consider is advise others to not

There have been multiple cases where a civilian has been put in danger, and someone has refused to help causing the civilian to be in immense pain or even resulted to death. Each case there is a dispute saying that if a person has the choice and does not help should, they should be sued. In this scenario an off duty police officer was attacked on the property of a 7-11, and the clerk refused to help, which lead to the police officer suing him.

Currently in the United States, there is no legal requirement to help others who are in need. This lack of a law requiring bystanders to help someone who obviously needs help has sometimes resulted in the death of the person in need. For example, in the cases of Kitty Genovese and Andrew Mormille that we have studied, bystanders have watched and done nothing to help as others died. Often the consequences of not helping are not so drastic, but the situations are still appalling. In one case I know of, a handicapped student fell down a staircase. Other students stepped over her, ignoring her pain and fear. Also, it was obvious they noticed her lying there, but none of them were willing to take the time or effort to help her up or make sure she was not seriously hurt. Should U.S. citizens be required by law to help those in need, especially

If you watch something awful happens and do nothing to help, should you be held responsible in a court of law? Why or why not. Yes, you should. In my opinion, a bystander’s act is worse than the perpetrator. The witnesses are capable of saving someone’s life but they choose not to. This act is so inhumane and disgusting. So I think they should also be blamed for the incident. Some of the acts are just ridiculous, like the woman who filmed her friend getting sexually assaulted, I can tell there was some misunderstanding between the man and the two 'grown' women and one of them got angry so she decided to deal with the situation in that cruel way which was unnecessary and caused more chaos. There are millions of better ways to handle the problem.

I am in the class of 2021; there are cool kids and then the not so cool kids. Colton is not your average kid, he is very short, non-athletic, in band, gamer, and to top it all off he was not the most loveable or nicest person ever. Kevin was a big, tall, mean, athletic, and all around bully, now I think you know why Colton was always picked on. Recess was not the bet time of the day for him. One tiny kid and many other larger kids together for 30 minutes of the day with no teachers watching, he was defiantly the laughing stock of the whole school but, recess wasn’t the only place he was getting picked on, the hallways, lunch, after school, and in classes. “Hey Shorty want to play some kickball?” As I was just being your average human bystander.

The by stander effect is a term that came to fruition when Kitty Genovese was brutally raped and murdered in front of her apartment, and 38 individuals witnessed the entire tragedy and turned a blind eye. Researchers were interested in this phenomenon and set out to research the bystander effect further. The bystander effect occurs when an individual’s likeliness of helping decreases when in the presence of others in an emergency situation (Fischer, Krueger, Greitmeyer, Vogrincic, Kastenmuller, & Frey, 2011). The purpose of this study is to measure the level of helpfulness among college age students with emphasis on the bystander effect. The model that this study follows is the Bystander Intervention Model by Latane and Darley. A series of five steps must be followed while intervening in the case of an emergency, the stages are again as follows: (1) noticing the event, (2) interpreting the event as an emergency, (3) making the choice to intervene, (4) knowing how to provide help, and (5) applying the behavior (Jenkins & Nickerson, 2016). As a group, we set out to analyze the bystander effect among college age students, while focusing on how gender impacts the given scenario.

Species in nature have chosen to live and thrive where they are comfortable. From time to time, unfortunate living conditions or a particular disease wipes out an area, calling for humans to get involved. Also, humans sometimes lead to the extinction of species, through poaching or the killing of a certain species. This may also occur when individuals cut down trees and destroy ecosystems. However, occasionally, human involvement can greatly benefit a certain species of animal or plant. Human intervention can lead to the growth of a certain species and allow them to thrive and reproduce in their ecosystem, causing the growth of a particular species.

The role of third party in conflict resolution has never been refuted. Though conflict can be resolved by those in conflict, often there is a need for a third party intervention. The qualitative case study was used to uncover the effectiveness of Sulh in resolving conflict. The research findings suggested two main criteria for the basis of conflict resolution in Malay married couples: (1) inline with syariah and laws, and (2) mutual agreement. This study also found that in handling sulh negotiation, respondents had used cocus and empowerment as the methods to resolve conflicts. As mediators in the sulh