Capital Punishment Should Be Supported For The Welfare Of Others

Imagine that you are arrested and going to be tried for a crime that you did, or did not, commit. What if you cannot afford the cost of a lawyer? Will you be able to handle the physical and mental toll that all of the appeals have on a person? The death penalty, or capital punishment, is one of the most debated topics in America. It has been used for centuries, but many claim it to be barbaric, and want the practice to end all together. The death penalty should only be used in cases where there is absolute evidence that the criminal is guilty, because life in prison can be an alternative, there are many flaws in the justice system, and it can be a cruel and unusual punishment.

Out of the 50 states, 26 of them have had at least one death row execution. American people (approximately 65%) say that they are still strong supporters in the Death Penalty. That is over half of the American population, for the Death Penalty. One may argue that it is a horrible way of giving people what they deserve; however, those people may not see the mistakes these people have made, making them not agree with this act. As this may be a contradiction, capital punishments is one of the life learning punishments known. It is legal in many states, but that doesn’t make it fair to all because its blameful, the cost is outrageous, and it’s time that needs to be spent helping, instead of killing.

Life is precious and should not be taken for granted. In the United States capitol punishment has been abolished or overturned in 20 states. According to Citizens United for Alternatives to the Death Penalty, the nation's opinion is split right down the middle. The death penalty has been the topic of discussion in recent years, it has been very controversial primarily based on how it is permanent. Once action is taken and the punishment of death has been dealt wrongful execution of an innocent person would be an injustice that can never be rectified.

Capital punishment, otherwise known as “The Death Penalty,” has been around for many years and has been the cause of death for over twelve hundred inmates since 1976 (“Death Penalty Information Center”), but is the Death Penalty really beneficial to the American public? This question is in the back of many people’s minds, and has left many questioning the meaning of the punishment. The death penalty targets murderers or high profile cases. Some say that the death penalty should apply to those who murder, rape, or abuse human beings such as children, or women. The significance of the penalty is to teach these criminals that there are laws that must be followed. In a figurative sense, it is to teach those potential wrongdoers a lesson. By

Somewhere someone is waiting in their cell cold, dark, and alone waiting until he’s taken in the death chamber. The death penalty or also known as capital punishment is the ultimate kind of punishment throughout some states in the country. The worst of the worst get that sentence but the there's a side that is overlooked, the innocent being sentenced to a crime that they didn’t commit all because of the faulty justice system. People have lost almost half their life due to the long process of even getting to the day they are executed. Some have gotten that sentenced there because of their skin color or just to win the popular vote to get re elected. Even with all this injustice the government has taken no action to stop this. The death penalty

There are political leaders that support capital punishment. Names such as, Hilary Clinton, Joe Biden and Stephen Joseph Harper. The common belief is that capital punishment reduces crime as well as brings justice to the criminals and the innocent. It acts as a way of eliminating the problem by killing the person that committed the crime and ensures the safety of the society. Stephen Joseph Harper stated that capital punishment is appropriate and a double-murderer should not be repatriated back into society. Joe Biden believes that capital punishment is necessary but it has to be implemented in a way that is consistent with our values as Americans. Hilary Clinton supports it but has stated that it’s a complex issue that needs to be limited.

average taxpayer cost is $31,286 per inmate. If there are 196,144 inmates in the federal

Cultural Relativist states that morality is created collectively by groups of humans and differs from society to society. Each type of society has its own moral norms which are binding on the people who belong to that type of society. Each type of society defines who is and who is not a member of the moral community. When it comes to capital punishment, you could use Cultural Relativist as a tool or guide. There are many people who fall into different types of groups when talking about capital punishment, there are some people who are pro-capital punishment and there are others who are against it. Capital punishment is defined as: the legally authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime. There are many reasons to be pro-capital punishment for example; Safety is the first thing that comes to my mind, you have one less person to worry about ever going to cause harm or pain in the world ever again. The second is the cost of prison time, sending people away to prison is a lot more expensive today than it was years ago. This is where capital punishment comes into place. It is a lot cheaper to just execute someone then just send them to jail. When it comes to being against capital punishment this is where certain types of religions come into place, others may not believe in executing someone because their religion does not approve of that type of treatment. In other words, God simply would not support the idea of execution. Another example would be morality, the

Death penalty is hot topic to discuss. Deciding whether or not if the death penalty should be used to this day. Arguments for and against the death penalty for under seven categories: morality, deterrence, retribution, mistakes, cost, race and income. People will argue that one category is stronger than the other. It comes down to which one is more important when supporting the death penalty. Retribution supports the death penalty because it brings closure to victim families. Morality claiming that people are in control of their own destiny and their destiny led them to death role. Deterrence is for preventing future crimes.

The origins of the death penalty date back to the eighteenth century B.C. and the abolitionist movement began during the Enlightenment Period with Voltaire and Montesquieu. While in some parts of the world capital punishment has been abolished completely, it is still a somewhat common practice in most of the United States. Throughout the 20th century, support for the death penalty fell drastically. According to the Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC), there were 1,289 executions in the 1940s, 715 in the 1950s, and only 191 between 1960 and 1976.

The death penalty would just be the easy way out of a crime that they committed. By killing a person over the murder that they have done you are not solving the problem or issue that was created. You are only killing another person. You can't fight fire with fire. Also you have to know both sides of the story before you can come to a conclusion of what penalty or punishment they deserve to have. Someone don't deserve the death penalty if you only know one side of the story . Some people fail to realize this.

From an early age, children are taught that murder is morally wrong. In today’s complex society that is impeded by unsettling periods of civil unrest, it is an expectation for everyone to acknowledge and accept that murder is one of the worst crimes individuals can commit. Perhaps it can be said that the death penalty is one of our legal system’s biggest contradictions of itself, as, if someone commits murder (or another heinous crime of that caliber), such ‘murderers’ will, in states that have capital punishment laws, be sent to Death Row and ultimately murdered in order to prevent potential future crimes by such perpetrators. I believe that the death penalty is wrong not only as it is immoral to take a life, but also, such ineffective laws waste money and do not deter crime.

Capital punishment has been around for many years as a way of executing criminals. Despite what most believe, capital punishment is not functional in the American society. Defenders of the death penalty often claim that the execution of criminals will teach others not to do bad, initially decreasing crime rates. Unfortunately, statistics prove that thought to be wrong. Capital punishment also has great flaws. For example, many innocent people have been put to death because of capital punishment. There also is no consistency. Two of the same crimes can be convicted in two different states and the consequences with be different for both offenders. The death penalty shows to be

Capital punishment or the death penalty no matter how you look at it instills a sense of fear among everyone. “On the eve of burying one of their own, the city police officer’s union asked Mayor Kurt L Schmoke to “instill fear in criminals” by putting more officers on the street and pushing for use of the death penalty”. (The Baltimore sun 1992). According to Albert Bandura’s social learning theory, humans learn from one another through observation. (Sigelman and Rider, 2015, p 44). The thought of death instills a sense of fear in everyone let alone knowing that the rules of the country calls for the death penalty when one commit acts such as murder and treason.

Welcome to America, the land of the free, of the prosperous, of the opulent. America the Beautiful, one of the only places in the world where all citizens regardless of race, background, or social class are constitutionally guaranteed life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness—that is unless you're on death row. In modern day America we are still faced with the antiquated ritual of capital punishment, a practice that interferes directly with the law of the land. The same forms of punishment used during the middle ages are still in effect today, the same ideas that should have been abolished had the U.S. government revised it's penology. Capital punishment is cruel as well as unusual and inadequate for our advanced society. The United