Cap's Accreditation Process Analysis

Now that I remain in the CLT program, it has actually opened my eyes to a complete different world of operating in the medical laboratory field. Having that chance to be more involved with the breakdown of the process of the clinical laboratory studies is astounding. I ‘am pleased to have prepared myself to travel beyond with a little in order to succeed with wealth of

Joint Commission International, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Lab is accredited by College of American Pathologist (CAP) (K.E., personal communication, 2016).

There are a great many different rules and regulations that make up the greater part of our daily lives. Often we become accustomed to many of these rules and regulations. Speed limits are there to keep people safe, crossing signals to let us know when we can safely cross a street and even there are laws in place to keep people from filling the same prescriptions at different pharmacies. These regulations and laws are there primarily for safety. There are, as well many laws and regulations in place for professionals, which similarity are in place for protection. In Arizona (as well as most states) the regulatory and credentialing process is there for both the protection of the counselor as well as the client.

When an individual is seeking medical care they expect the highest quality of care. Accreditation of a facility or department is a way to obtain the confidence of a patient. When a facility does obtain accreditation they are officially being recognized as being qualified to perform studies that will yield diagnostic images as well as provide quality patient care. The department who hold the accreditation status will then be held to minimum standards and or requirements in order to maintain the status. Any facility or department seeking accreditation is eligible under the guidelines of the different accreditation agencies (Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC), 2015). On the other hand if a facility fails

I am here to tell you, if you pursue becoming Accredited in Public Relations (APR), you won’t regret it, not one bit! Maybe myFPRA accreditation story will inspire those of you “on the fence” about this important accreditation.

30). According to Brunstein (2016), individual tests can be moved to a patient’s bedside or in other less formal settings to provide faster diagnosis, allowing for quicker response times when medical interventions are needed (p. 30). Bedside testing uses a method called point-of-care testing (POCT) and presents both new possibilities as well as challenges (Brunstein, 2016, p. 30). Brunstein (2016) points out some of the challenges are decreased sensitivity, specificity, or sometimes both, especially when compared to the testing that is done in the core lab (p.30). However, POCT can prove to be advantageous because of reduced response times for medical interventions. POCT with moderate sensitivity and high specificity have proven to be convenient, cost effective first-line screening tools (Brunstein, 2016, p. 30). Molecular POCT has positive implications for the future but there are some limitations. POCT used for molecular diagnosis (Madix) are limited to only

Ensure performance reviews and competency assessments get done on time by auto-mating and simplifying your processes and forms. Staff throughout the organization get the direction, feedback, development and recognition they need to be engaged and high performing and to improve patient care.

The preanalytical errors increases health care costs and decreases the patient satisfaction. The laboratory errors that happen at any stage of the total testing process have influence on quality of laboratory services. Any errors that happen during this total testing process will affect the patient care that also includes unnecessary recollection of samples, delay in reporting, misdiagnosis and treatment by the clinician. Although the errors can happen at any stage of the total testing process, preanalytical errors accounts for highest percentage (70%). The consequences associated with analytical errors are significantly reduced by the use of modern laboratory instruments. But pre analytical phase is still prone to more errors due to its complexity and different stages that involved within and outside laboratory. The inaccurate reporting of results due to preanalytical errors leads to unnecessary investigations and creating an additional burden to the healthcare system (Kaushik, & Green, 2014). According to Green (2013) the healthcare economist created a model to quantify the costs associated with laboratory errors and poor sample quality. It is based on operating costs, number of beds, test volume, number of rejected samples, instrument problems and the frequency of inaccurate results reported by laboratory and their impacts. As per this model

College of American Pathologists (CAP) accreditation helps laboratories meet Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) regulatory requirements and certifies compliance through the guidance a complete list of the most recent clinical and laboratory standards. By doing this it ensures accuracy of lab results and maintains correct patient diagnosis. This increases the value of the laboratory. The CAP accreditation program is based on peer based inspections that use working laboratory professionals who are qualified through a CAP training program. It is the responsibility of the laboratory supervisors, managers, and directors to attend this training and participate in the CAP accreditation process.

Another ethical issue with the establishment of WGS as a clinical test, is the fact that the sequence data could be a

The process was very interesting to me, especially when the lab reviewed his results with him. SNP’s (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms) are new to me, but unique in the role they play. Every 3 million spots, a SNP or different letter appear in a human’s genome. For example, one person may have a C at a position, while the other person has a T at that same position (Tyson). A majority of SNP’s are normal and distinguish individuals from one another, but some are predisposing risks. SNP’s that match up with SNP’s from a person with a specific disease means that the person getting tested is at risk for that

Accreditation benefits all stakeholders and stimulates continuous improvement The laboratory acquires national and international recognition, credibility and acceptance by public as well as clinical decision makers by providing accurate and reliable results. The laboratory also saves time and gains financially by getting correct results at first instance.[5,6] Accreditation programs can help drive improvements in the management of individual laboratories and laboratory networks and may also have positive spillover effects on the performance in other sectors of the health care system. (7 ) Other benefits reported from engaging in accreditation include increases in team work and internal cohesion, motivation to standardize procedures, integration

The CAPS test is an instrument administered for career assessment, the assessment relates to occupational abilities. In order for this test to be considered reliable, it must be consistent in that it measures what it suppose to measure (Knapp, Knapp, & Knapp-Lee, 1992, p. 40), which is occupational abilities. I believe that the CAPS test has acceptable reliability, if the test is re-administered in two weeks, my results are bound to be similar due to the timing and length of the test. The timing and length reduced my chances of memorizing the content of the test. On the other hand, to have validity, a test must measure what it purports to measure (Hays, 2013, p. 96). In my opinion, the CAPS has fairly acceptable validity, but lacks face validity in that it does not look like it measures occupational abilities but educational abilities. However, face validity does not prove as evidence of validity (Hays, 2013, p. 97). I believe the CAPS has fairly acceptable validity, considering that it fairly predicts appropriate careers to explore according to the test taker’s results and suggested career groups.

equipment and lab services for each and every client. We know that it is vital

Kumar, V., Abbas, A. K., Aster, J. C., & Robbins, S. L. (2013). Robbins basic pathology.