Case Study: Defendant V.

The defendant did sign a contract with the Los Angeles Rams covering the span of the 1960-1962 seasons. He then received two checks for $10,000 and $500. Not long after, the defendant signed another contract

The petitioner, Morris A. Kent Jr., was initially detained at the age of 14, due to multiple home burglaries and many attempted purse snatchings. Morris Kent

Repyneck recalls in 2011 she was going through a divorce from her husband Michael Ziegler. Repyneck was having financial problem and she was advised to seek a bankruptcy lawyer. Repyneck was scheduled for a hearing in Hellertown on Wednesday and her divorce attorney recommended David Tidd from Hellertown. She called Tidd, she thought it was either Sunday or Monday, and he told her to bring a payment to retain him to his office on Tuesday and he would make the hearing on Wednesday go away. After she went to his office, Tidd told her she wouldn’t have to appear in court on Wednesday, that he would take care of it.

Wilke, Fleury, Hoffelt, Gould & Birney, David A. Frenznick and Anthony J. DeCristoforo, for Defendant Robert Del Pero.

Christopher Lambesis (Father) and Erin Lambesis (Mother) were divorced in 2013. In the divorce decree, Father was ordered to pay Mother $100 per month for child support for the two minor children. In October 2014, Father filed a Petition to Modify Child Support. Based on his own calculations using the Parent’s Worksheet for Child Support, he requested Mother pay him $100 per month. Mother requested a hearing in response including her own calculations indicating that Father should be paying her $123 per month. An evidentiary hearing was held and the court ordered Father to pay mother child support amounting to $149.30 per month. Father filed a Motion for a New Trial stating that he was not provided with documentation regarding Mother’s financial status in a timely manner and that the family court’s child support obligation calculations were incorrect. Mother filed an Application for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. The court denied Father’s request for a new trial and granted Mother’s request for attorney fees. Father filed a motion to reconsider the allocation of parenting time coordinator’s fees. This motion was also denied. Father appealed the court’s decision.

Lastly, John and Mary Doe, a married couple, filed a companion complaint, connecting their case to that of Roe’s. They were seeking declaratory and injunctive help and they made the District attorney the defendant. Both, John and Mary

On August 26, 2015, you responded to 41 Olsen Rd. Cocoa in reference to a violation of a "no contact" order. During your investigation you developed probable cause to arrest Alicia Balderston for violating a "no contact" order that was issued on August 20, 2015 due to a domestic violence arrest. During this call you took written statements from the victim and two witnesses.

Victim’s Summary: Linda said she filed for PO-17-421 on Wenesday, November 29th, 2017 against James. Linda said James had drove by her home loacted at 35156 West 21st Street in Mannford on Wenesday, Novemeber 29th, 2017. Linda said the road to her home is on a dead end street and James did not have a reason to be by the home. Linda was trying to file a violation of protective order report over the phone on Thursdat, November 30th, 2017. Linda said she recieved a missed call from James on Thursday, November 30th, 2017. Linda said she had James served on Wenesday, Novemeber 29th, 2017 by the Sapulpa Police when James was in Sapulpa.

I made contact with the defendant who identified himself as being Michael King. I asked the defendant if he was previously trespassed from this location at which time he replied “yes”. I advised dispatch that I was out with Michael King at this location at which time I was advised that he was trespassed from this location on 3/4/2018 (Reference to case #2018-0287). An in house computer check confirmed that the defendant was notified of being

She was charged with the above offenses and issued a Maybrook Court date (02/08/17 at 9:00 A.M. room

First off, I was extremely surprised about how many landlord-tenant cases take place. However for a majority of the cases, the defendant failed to appear in court resulting in numerous default judgments. For instance, the plaintiff: Stadium Drive Apartments made three attempts to deliver notices, one being a personal delivery attempt, and the defendant Joyce Russell failed to appear in court. The result, a default judgment, fines of $1149 and $139.74 totaling to 1288.74. There was another instance where a defendant Ramsey had 2 months of unpaid rent, which were grounds for eviction. The landlord began the eviction process, serving multiple nonpayment of rent notices, and later a Demand for Possessions for Nonpayment of rent. These lawful eviction procedures require completion prior to going to court, therefore the plaintiff did everything they were entitled to. Subsequently, in court the plaintiff filed for termination of residency. The defendant astoundingly did not appear in court, and yet another default judgment was made. The judge ordered either a sheriff or a court

This correspondence shall confirm that the undersigned appeared at applicant’s attorney’s office in Stockton, California on April 18, 2017, to complete the applicant’s deposition. The handling attorney, Mr. Rod McClelland, was unable to attend the applicant’s deposition due to an unavoidable calendar conflict. This file will be returned to Mr. McClellan for further defense handling.

As you know, we represent Dr. Scott St. John, former psychotherapist to Lee Medina. In the interest of bringing the matter between Dr. St. John and your client, Molly Sumner, to an expeditious closure, I have been sanctioned by our client’s employer to give the following settlement offer and to offer additional compensation for her minor foster child, Portia. Understand that this letter, and any offer made herein, is considered to be a confidential settlement communication pursuant to Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. Fed. R. Evid. 408. Please deliberate with your client, give our offer every consideration, and contact our office with your decision within

The defendant, Andrelly Garcia is a 27 year old female, from Massapequa, NY. Who is currently separated from her husband, the father of her two small children, Rosalin (6) and Jacob (4). Mrs. Garcia stated that Mr. Garcia is financially supporting the household, because she is currently unemployed. She reported to be in good physical and mental health.

Plaintiff claims false arrest and malicious prosecution. Plaintiff states he was arrested for criminal possession of marijuana however no marijuana was recovered. PO Hernandez, PO Bonet, and PO Heredia were members of the anti-crime in PSA 6. Officers observed via Viper camera plaintiff and two other apprehended individuals smoking marijuana in the park behind a housing project. Officers approached plaintiff and two individuals and conducted a stop and frisk. Officers did not recover any contraband or marijuana was recovered. Plaintiff and the two individuals were transported to the precinct where a bag of marijuana was recovered during a search at the precinct. Officers could not determine ownership of the marijuana therefore all three were