preview

Celia Slave Case

Decent Essays

In the 1850s there were slave debates about how whites were forced to make daily moral decisions about slavery. Celia’s case actually demonstrates how Newsom’s abuse of power over a single slave obligated whites to make moral decisions about the nature of slavery. Moral decision making is usually made with ethnical motives in mind, with the help of distinction between right and wrong by each individual person. In the trial that involved Celia due to the facts given, the jury ignored the humanity of the slaves and made an unrighteous decision to condone in the sexual abuse and exploitation of young, helpless, female slaves. To the courts and jury that may have been the “morally correct” thing to do, but anyone in their right mind and who has a heart know that, that is physically, mentally, and most …show more content…

When Celia was being sexually abused and the Newsom’s daughters knew it and decided not to confront their father it’s because in their case the consequences of their actions could have been negative. For a decision to actually be morally right the consequences that follow have to be more positive than negative. So, if they would have stood up for Celia against their father, it would have had a negative effect on them and that’s what prevented them from stopping such abuse. Also with George in his situation it was morally right for him to snitch on Celia, his lover, because his life was at risk. If he would have stuck by her side and not have been honest the upcoming consequences would have been negative. Although in Celia’s eyes and anyone else’s it would have probably been wrong, he did what he had to do to survive, and that’s how male slaves were put at a disadvantage to defend slave women. When it comes down to ideal moral decision making it’s hard to pinpoint anyways because morals vary by individuals and are subjective to different

Get Access