preview

Charles Sumner's First School Integration Case

Decent Essays

In 1849 Charles Sumner fought the country’s first school integration case, “Sarah C. Roberts v. The City of Boston.” Sumner represented Sarah Roberts who’s father filed a lawsuit going against the city of Boston. Like Roberts father, many parents in Boston were infuriated and showed bitterness because they were taxed to support schools their children were not allowed to attend. The court ruled that school segregation was neither irrational nor unlawful. The Massachusetts legislature later passed law prohibiting school segregation, in 1855.
Sumner’s argument reflects the Constitution of Massachusetts, “ all men, without distinction of race or color, are equal before the law.” The Declaration of Independence states, “all men are created equal”. Sumner builds his argument around these documents and interprets them, as a key quality that Roberts was not receiving “Equality before the law.” Equality is a key component to our lives as humans. Each individual has an idea on what equality should mean to him or her. Every human’s definition of equality can be unique and different due to his or her experiences they have …show more content…

The caste system explained in Sumner’s work is the distinct origin of the different races, which cannot be changed. Sumner points out that caste is a violation of persons equality, “ The Separation of children in the Public Schools of Boston, on account of color or race, is in the nature of caste, and is a violation of Equality.” (Sumner, 1849) Equality is on the ground of discrimination in this condition, condemning a child due to her race or color. The word caste in his argument is being applied to white and black races. Thus, in power he applies this term to use it as a distinction on account of color, to make a notion that racial classification were happening in the schools of Boston as well as the with the judges in this

Get Access