Chief Justice Dbq Essay

On February 17, 1801, Thomas Jefferson was elected to be the third president of the United States. Even though he was elected then, Jefferson would not actually take office until March 4, 1801. Current President John Adams was on his way out of office and wanted to ensure that the incoming candidate of the opposing party would have as little power as possible. To do this, on March 3, 1801, Madison appointed 42 Federal justices of the peace and 16 Federal circuit judges. This was all a result of the Judiciary Act of 1801. These appointments had to be delivered by hand to the appointees and they attempted to deliver all of them by the end of the day on March 3, 1801. When President Thomas Jefferson took office the next day, he instructed James Madison to halt the deliveries of the remaining appointments. As such, William Marbury decided to sue James Madison for not giving him his official appointment. The case was brought to the Supreme Court and they decided on February 24, 1803 that Madison was in his right to refuse delivery of the appointment. (Lockemy)

To begin with, the Marshall Era authenticated the Supreme Court’s position in the federal government through Marbury v. Madison. The case was pursued by William Marbury; a judge appointed by Adams on one of the last days of his presidency. Marbury along with several other judges were appointed to the Supreme Court by Adams, however their new positions were never finalized. When Madison came into office, he would not allow these judges to report to the positions that Adams appointed them to because they were never official. Marshall decided that the power of the Supreme Court was not enough to force Madison to allow the judges to serve. Through this very famous supreme court case, John Marshall created judicial review. Judicial review states that the Supreme Court is allowed

The Tenure of Office Act was passed on March 2 1867. It guaranteed that all federal officials whose position required Senate approval could not be removed with the consent of the Senate. The Act did allow the President to suspend an official, and if the Senate refused to agree in the removal, the official would have been returned in their position.

John Marshall, considered by many to be the greatest Chief Justice in the Supreme Court, has copious achievements under his name. The ones that gave him the most fame were his involvement with establishing the power of the court and placing it equal among the executive and legislative branch, his important decisions in court cases that strengthened federal power, and instituting judicial review as a national power given to the judicial branch. However, these are not the only things John Marshall should be known for during his lifespan.

The Brethren, co-authored by Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong, is an in-depth documentary of the United States Supreme Court from 1969 to 1975, under the leadership of Warren Burger. The book attempts to present the reader with what "really" goes on in the Supreme Court. It describes the conferences, the personality of justices, and how justice's feel toward each other, items which are generally hidden from the public. This book is comparable to a lengthy newspaper article. Written more as a source of information than of entertainment, The Brethren is the brutal truth, but not boring. The storytelling is clearly slanted against the Burger court but the overall quality of the work

When the sun rose this morning, most any conservation about Supreme Court vacancies would have centered around President Obama replacing Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg – the eldest of the court’s nine justices and a two-time cancer survivor who will turn 83 next month.

Taft replaced Edward D. White as Chief Justice. Taft was able to organize and improve the efficiency of the court system. Taft helped secure passage of the Judge’s Act of 1925. This act gave the Supreme court the ability to decide which cases they would choose to hear. (Staff) Taft accomplished a lot during his time as a Supreme Court Justice. One of Taft’s greatest accomplishments was securing funds to build the first building designed for the use of the Supreme Court. (Cushman and Rehnquist) Taft personally supervised the building’s design and earl stages of construction. (Cushman and Rehnquist) Sadly, Taft did not live to see the building finished in 1935. William Howard Taft passed away on March 8, 1930 from complications of heart disease.

Facts: The respondent Jeffery Landrigan was convicted of murder, during his incarceration he stabbed and killed an inmate. Three years later, Mr. Landrigan escaped prison and killed Chester Dyer. Mr. Landrigan was found guilty of second degree murder, burglary, and felony murder. During the sentencing phase of the trial, Mr. Landrigan counsel attempted to present mitigating evidence to the judge. The mitigating evidence was Mr. Landrigan ex-wife, and birth mother, whom were not allowed to testify. Mr. Landrigan counsel explained to the judge, that his client did not want any testimony from his family. Mr. Landrigan counsel tried to explain the importance of both witness but Mr. Landrigan did not allow him to speak (counsel). The judge asked Mr. Landrigan if he had anything to add before he sentenced him. The defendant said to give him the death penalty. The trial judge sentenced Landrigan to death. After the trial, Landrigan filed a notion, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. Mr. Landrigan petitioned for habeas corpus, challenging the state court for not allowing mitigating evidence to be presented under the death penalty act of 1996.

There have been many Supreme Court Justices throughout history who have made significant impacts. Warren E. Burger is one of many of the Chief Court Justices who have strived for excellence. Burger the 15th Supreme Court Chief Justice wanted excellence, but would continually fall short of doing so. Burger was one of the longest running Chief Justices, although he was filled with good intentions he would make only a slight impact on laws affecting the Untied States.

When judges are appointed to the federal judiciary they must take into account the atmosphere they will be entering into (the judicial climate a judge enters). These new appointees will enter into their position where they must interact with people who have been there longer than they have. By the time these new judges enter the federal judiciary there is already an existing composition and atmosphere. They enter into the decisions already made, in which they must uphold the precedents made and constitutionality of cases or, if in the trial and appellate courts, the result may lead to the higher court overturning their decisions. When decisions are constantly being overturned it can result in a lack of legitimacy of the judge and could eventually result in impeachment, recall vote, etc.

vital source of power. Its presence, unlike today, was mostly ignored by politicians and lawyers. However, this establishment under Chief Justice John Marshall, was transformed into a powerful factor which shaped America 's legal system. John Marshall 's Court decisions, became the foundational steppingstone for the Supreme Court, which established concrete judiciary authority. By solidify the power of the Supreme Court, Marshall constructed the principles of judiciary review, and also redefined the importance of the Supreme Court. The development of judiciary power influenced constitutional laws. John Marshall 's

“A self-made man, Chief Justice Earl Warren transformed the judicial system during a tumultuous time for American politics.” (Oyez). Aside from his great accomplishments through American

Appointed to the Supreme Court two hundred years ago as a final act of a defeated President, Marshall is arguably the most significant judge in American history--yet only now is he getting the scholarly recognition he so richly deserves. For instance, Herbert A. Johnson, the founding editor of the invaluable Papers of John Marshall, Charles F. Hobson, his successor, and Jean Edward Smith have written excellent biographies of Marshall. These works tend toward the massive, as does G. Edward White 's important study of the last twenty years of the Marshall Court. One could list many specific examinations of aspects of Marshall 's years on the bench, all highlighting the renewed interest in the Chief Justice. R. Kent Newmyer 's new biography reminds us why John Marshall still matters.

So our government is made up of the Branches, the names of those branches are Legislative,Executive, and finally the Judicial. Legislative is the branch of group that makes the laws. If they see a law needed in the country that would help then they will write the law and pass it onto the Executive. The Executive branch passes the laws if they think it is needed. So if both the Legislative and Executive agree on the law then it will be passed on from the Executive to the Judicial. Finally we have the Judicial who then looks over the law and see if the law is constitutional or unconstitutional. These 3 branches of government make it so on branch doesn’t overrule another branch. It’s all a balance when it comes to power because it just like rock paper scissors. If the Legislative is rock and they want to pass a law but the Executive who is paper doesn't think the law is okay, the law goes back to the Legislative. Then if the Executive who is once again paper passes a law but the

The Supreme Court has had many different places where it was located over the years. There has been a struggle to find a permanent home for the most powerful court of law. At first, the meetings were in the Merchant Exchange Building in New York City. The court then followed the nation's capitol to Philadelphia in 1790. In 1800 the court again relocated to Washington DC. At first they spent their time meeting in various places. The place to find the Supreme Court now is in Washington DC, on First Street located in Northeast.