Argument culture is what societies and politics are built upon, but there are downsides. Argument culture, when used in politics with negative ideals and ideas involved leads to war, and corruption to hatred down to interpersonal levels. A strong example of how this is shown is in a series of stories called Children of Israel, Children of Palestine: Our True Stories. In this collection of stories, children have their own tales about what happens when families get involved with racism and forgiveness.The largest example of racism in the short bit of stories I have read has to be in Thumbprint. A very well shown place where argument culture is not the way to go is when, on page 19, the father starts arguing with the mother on how the child should be raised. His temper chose to rise instead of calming down and discussing it. It shows the large difference in traditions, and he was saddened by how his father acted. A great divide was created by the Oslo Accords, a peace agreement between the Israeli and the Palestinians. …show more content…
As the systematic racism and hatred had increased on political and militarial levels, some people on the interpersonal level still did not harbor apprehension or hatred. In The Arab of Abu-Anton, it was made unclear as whether or not racism exists in the lower parts of the city. But, using a few clues from how the child worded things, there is a large separation between the different people living where they are. It is implied by how far the children traveled away from their home, they “walked from house to house, near the church and the Italian hospital, and on the other side of the street, and back,...”(Ebud Ben-Ezer, 35). This shows that they were weary of leaving past their neighborhood, which is normal for children. It showcases the good side of culture divisions and how argument culture affects
In the story “Araby” the protagonist is portrayed by the author to seem young, which limited his ability to see past his dull, dead-end neighborhood. The author explains the boy’s carefree mindset by describing how the protagonist and his friends would run through the back lanes of the houses and hide in the shadows when they reached the street again.
Deborah Tannen's book, The Argument Culture, is a compelling piece that looks at the perceived "argument culture" that is permeating the United States and the West in general. I do agree with what Ms. Tannen is saying, that there is a form of argument culture, but I think it could be argued that there is a contrasting part of American society called a "nice culture" as well. On the one hand, you have people who will argue about topics whenever the opportunity arises, but on the other hand you have people who will avoid confrontation at all costs. Ms. Tannen somewhat acknowledges other ethnic cultures in the United States that tend to argue in different ways, "You do not have to go to a foreign country to experience these cultural differences [of how people argue in different cultures.] Americans of different ethnic backgrounds can experience them just by making friends." (Tannen, 211)Acknowledging ethnic culture differences is important but to homogenize it into just an argument culture is wrong.It could still be argued that there is a converse culture in the United States that is based around niceness and civility. You can see it in the world around you where you are taught to use your manners as much as possible or in fast food jobs where workers are supposed to be as "nice" as possible and if anybody makes a mistake they are supposed to apologize as sincerely as possible. Another example of this nice culture is contrast to the argument culture is when adults are arguing
Many people suffered during WWII, not just the targeted people. Many people were also killed for nothing and they couldn’t do anything to stop the catastrophe for they could be punished greatly. A few people like Anne Frank, Liesel, and the boys Rudi, Karl. and Helmuth were part of this war and have differences and similarities with their experiences during the time of the war.
Looking for Palestine by Najla Said is a coming of age story with a twist. Set mainly in New York City, Said tells us about growing up Palestinian-Lebanese American in a time when difference was not necessarily celebrated, and dealing with the demons in her own mind so that she could fully accept herself. Born to the world renown Dr. Edward Said and his wife, Mariam, Said spends her summers traveling to her mother’s home in Lebanon to visit family, learning to value the culture she was born into. Unfortunately, this love of her culture begins to fade as Said enters a primarily Caucasian elementary school. There she is faced with the idea that her culture is different and that she
Tannen did a fantastic job depicting her opinions and giving examples of our argumentative culture. Our views on “arguments” are mostly brought up by others. It is definitely a social problem, whether it be in a classroom, a discussion between friends, or even a spat between couples, there is always an argument that will arise. She suggests that when we argue we are in “battle.” When we are in battle we tend to believe that those who we are battling are wrong, and we are right. Then, we try to persuade others to not only be on our side, but even perhaps step into our “battles” and either fight them for us, or fight a majority for us. Tannen provides examples on the ramifications of the observations she has listed. Debates can be used for “entertainment” purposes, to perhaps get conversations started, but it’s all a social aspect. Not only that, but we are creatures of habit. We do what we see. If we see our parents arguing we as young children will be more susceptible to starting arguments and repeating our parents’ actions. Even as we grow older, in ways we still hold on to the some of the values and actions. The more our parents’ argue the more we think its okay to argue with other and use their tactics to “win” our arguments. There would be no one to entertain if we weren’t social with each other.
“The Argument Culture shapes who we are and has a defining impact on our lives and on our culture.” She believes it causes us to distort facts.
Joe Sacco’s graphic novel, Palestine, deals with the repercussions of the first intifada in Israel/Palestine/the Holy Land. The story follows the author through the many refugee camps and towns around Palestine as he tries to gather information, stories, and pictures to construct his graphic novel. While the book is enjoyable at a face level, there are many underlying themes conveyed throughout its illustrated pages and written text.
Over one million Jewish children died during the Holocaust. They were ripped out of their homes and taken away from their families, and stripped of their childhoods. Innocent lives were caught in a war that they were not able to stop. When Adolf Hitler came to power in 1933, he promised Germany that he would improve life their by getting rid of the one race that caused the problems, the Jews. Jews, including Jewish children, were sent to concentration camps, inspected, and if approved, were sent to work. All others would have been sent to be killed. Being sent to work did not ensure survival, children would be given very little food and water, and beaten severely, which caused their death. None of the children of the Holocaust will ever
The Palestinian-Israeli conflict has been in existence since the end of 19th century. The conflict became an international concern when Israel got its independence in 1948. This conflict has resulted in a lot of minor conflicts and 5major wars.
Territorial disputes over which religion should have control over the holy lands have been ongoing for about two thousand years with little to no resolution in sight. Everyday, on the news, there is a story about how there was retaliation over the killing of a Palestinian or Israeli. As a result of these more are killed leading to the cyclical pattern of retribution. This conflict has diminutive weight in the eyes of the people of the world since it has been carried on for so long. The argument for both groups is a claim that Jerusalem is the rightful possession of their religion and the key to the survival of their cultures. Promises for peace are frequent but never upheld by either side. As the everyday struggle for peace continues
Israel successfully fought off the pan-Arab army while other Israeli combatants terrorized and depopulated the countryside. Ilan Pappe termed the depopulation of Palestinians as “ethnic cleansing” but can this phrase be properly used when discussing the events of 1947-1948? To answer this question one must determine if there is a well-established definition of the phrase ‘ethnic cleansing’ and also establish that this was the intent of the Zionists, both initially and subsequently. This can be determined by examining Zionist policy and action previous to the U.N partition plan and after, which will demonstrate that the term is appropriately applied to the situation by Pappe.
Any reference to conflict turns history into a reservoir of blame. In the presence of conflict, narratives differ and multiply to delegitimize the opponent and to justify one’s own action. Narratives shape social knowledge. The Israeli Palestinian conflict, both Jews and Muslims, view the importance of holding the territories through religious, ideological, and security lenses, based on belief that Palestine was given by divine providence and that the land belongs to either the Israelis or Palestinian’s ancestral home. Understanding these perspectives is required for understanding Palestinians’ and especially Israel’s strategy and role in entering the Oslo peace process. Despite
The Arab-Israeli Conflict The Arab Israeli conflict has gone on for many years. There have been many wars, terrorist attacks and peace treaties between Israel and the Arab countries. Through war and Treaties Israel has gained and lost alot of land. There have been 4 major wars between Israel and The Arab countries, as well as terrorist attacks.
In the Iranian film, Children of Heaven, the city has an affect how people communicate, how they develop. Correspondingly, an urban atmosphere affects what people’s attitudes and cultures are depending on their social status is. There are many somatic setting differences between the unfortunate and the fortunate, for example what Ali’s family wears and where the family lives compared to the gated communities as shown in the film. Moreover, the consequences of the urban environment in a city. Ali and Zhara are definitely exposed to an urban environment that could potentially shape how they act, or who they become as they get older.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is one of the most controversial conflicts in modern history. The expansion of Israel since 1947 is seen as the beginning of the conflict, although its origins go back to the end of the 19th century, when Jewish immigration to Palestine began to increase. Since the start of the conflict, several peace negotiations have been carried out, resulting in variable degrees of success.