Christian Belief Systems : The Humanist And The Christian Beliefs

Civil Disobedience has been around for hundreds of years. This a practice first put into play by a man by the name of Henry David Thoreau who believed that if you didn’t agree with a rule then you should act against it in a nonviolent way, and be willing to accept any punishment that comes with it. His teachings were followed by famous activists such as Ghandi, and Martin Luther King Jr., and many others.

I believe civil disobedience is the refusal to obey certain laws, usually without violence, but only if it’s to make a point. In Thoreau’s essay about civil disobedience, there were points made which I agreed with, but there were things that I disagreed with. Some points he made that I agreed with was that if someone wants something to change, they should do something and do it wholeheartedly. An additional point he made which I agreed with was to depend and think for one’s self. While he’s made points which I agreed with, there’s one I didn’t which was when he said that the military was programmed to do whatever the government says.

Brilliantly put by what many deem to be America’s greatest president of all time, Abraham Lincoln, “Let every man remember that to violate the law is to trample on the blood of his father, and to tear the charter of his own and his children’s liberty.” Civil disobedience is defined as the refusal to comply with certain laws as a form of political protest. Although many may argue that this is the sole way to keep the government in check and to make minorities heard, rational people will realize that it is not this disrespect of the law that proves the democracy of our nation.

If we take a closer look at civil disobedience, we can better understand what it means, its goals, and its outcomes. Civil disobedience predominantly exists as direct and non-violent government defiance. Instead of voicing an opinion with a vote or a simple conversation, civil disobedience stands up for what is right using an individual’s whole influence. Therefore, some sacrifices regarding the legality of actions are made in order to preserve the integrity of the mission. In other words, why should a protester follow the law that they are trying to alter? That doesn’t make much sense, therefore civil disobedience allows unjust laws to be broken for the greater good. This method is very effective if, for example, a minority is attempting to

Civil disobedience, according to Henry David Thoreau in 1849, is the act of disapproving a law and accepting the concomitant consequences. Thoreau’s

Civil disobedience is the refusal to conform to a society or a set of laws. Civil disobedience has come a long way from its beginning. It has been developing and will continue for generations to come, as it is considered a duty of a person. The opinions and beliefs of civil disobedience cultured in our society by both Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. are still present in our modern-day society; nevertheless, these opinions and beliefs still need to be expanded in order to keep up with the fast-growing population.

Civil Disobedience is the peaceful act of protesting a law between the civilians and government. Henry Thoreau explains it like this "… honest men to rebel and revolutionize" (page 392). In civil disobedience by Henry Thoreau he is explaining how the government of his time is abusing its power and people and how the people should do as he did and be a civil disobedient when the laws and government are unjust and go against a man's conscience. Thoreau wants the readers to peacefully protest the laws they feel are unjust, be aware of his own conscience, not be a puppet of the government, and not support anything that is of wrong-doing. He tells the readers to act and not just stand by passively or at least stop supporting what they feel is wrong, and I do believe he presents an effective argument for his point, and as accordingly it appeals to the common man.

“Civil Disobedience” is an essay written by Henry David Thoreau in 1848. Thoreau protested many issues at the time such as slavery, the Mexican war, and taxes; he stood for peaceful protests or civil disobedience. Civil disobedience is the act of publicly, peacefully, and conscientiously breaching any corrupt and or unequal law(s) in order to bring about a change in said law or policy. Almost one hundred years later, on April 16th, 1963, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr wrote the “Letter from a Birmingham Jail;” a response to a public statement of concern and caution issued by eight white religious leaders of the South. King, in the “Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” conveys to his readers that the laws set against the African American are unjust and

Civil disobedience is a peaceful form of political protest for the refusal of certain laws or acts. In “Letter From Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther King Jr., segregation is explained when, “Negroes have experienced grossly unjust treatment in the courts…

This time period is in the 1800’s. Civil disobedience is the refusal to comply with certain laws or to pay taxes and fines, as a peaceful form of political protest. Henry David Thoreau believes that violence is not the answer to any solution. He thinks that if you carry out things in a peaceful way you will get what you want more often than being destructive. He wants people to stand up for what is right because in the 1800’s people rights were a problem. Women didn’t have much rights then. Blacks didn’t have much rights then. The only people that had rights were rich white men. So it is important to stand up for what you believe and be peaceful about it so the government will have to be active and fix the problem because the government is

Civil disobedience is a protest against the oppression people feel from their government, and when they feel they have no other route, no other way to get their voices heard, they calmly gather as a people, and show their government what they feel is wrong. The people who join in the marches and stand up at the rallies, they know that in the eyes of the law, what they are doing is wrong. Yet, this people know that in the eyes of morality and justice for the people, what the government is doing is wrong, so they accept those facts, and accept their punishment.

Civil disobedience is the act of opposing a law one considers unjust and peacefully disobeying it while accepting the consequences. This peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society and overtime, makes it more “free.” Remonstrating unjust laws also reveals how corrupt our society today is as a whole considering the hatred and retaliation exerted towards protestors. Overall, civil disobedience is necessary for society to adapt to the new norms of the forever-changing world.

Civil disobedience is the act of prioritizing an individual’s conscience over what the law dictates. In a country, the government formulates laws that govern the subjects. These laws are to some extent discriminative and oppressive (Thoreau 87). Civil disobedience is the rebellious nature that people tend to develop against the oppressive laws in their country. Civil disobedience is the war that the governed wages against the governing institutions and policies that are oppressive and discriminative.

Civil disobedience is the act of directly disobeying laws and rules believed to be oppressive, and when done passively is one of the better ways of changing society. Civil disobedience, as presented in Steinbeck’s novel, is shown through the actions of the African American Civil Rights Movement. Such refusals include performing sit-ins, an action where the protestors would sit in a spot designated for white people and peacefully remain where they were, and boycotts, where protesters refused to support agencies such as the transit system that enforced segregation. In his novel, Steinbeck encounters a young African American Student and has a conversation about the Civil Rights Movement. One area of particular interest is about the varying levels of protest, whether it was better to use the slow peaceful forms of disobedience proposed by Martin Luther King Jr., or whether more violent action is needed. Steinbeck’s contribution to the discussion mirrored the views of MLK, while the student held more aggressive views, as seen here, “Finally we spoke of Martin Luther King and his teaching of passive but unrelenting resistance. ‘It’s too slow,’ he said. ‘It will take too long.’ ‘There’s improvement, there’s constant improvement. Gandhi proved it’s the only weapon that can win against violence.’” It is clear that Steinbeck has more faith in the passive methods, while the student agreed that those methods worked, he questioned their proficiency, saying, “I know all that. I’ve studied

Christians believe that Jesus is both God and man, incarnation of God, and man -gives man two natures, physical and divined that they are united in one person. Thus the mystery of God becoming a human being, Jesus, and suffered and died, and Mary (Jesus' mother) was the mother of God. God resolved himself to mankind in 3 ways, as God the father, God the sun and the Holy Spirit. From this we can see that Christianity is based on the