The characters in John Green’s book come from all different places in society dealing with privilege. But, through this idea, the theme that privilege affects your life is apparent. To begin, Aza states, “Mom and I lived on the side that sometimes floods. The Picketts lived on the side with the stone-gabbed walls that forced the rising water our direction,” (Green, 2017, p. 15). This river is like a divisor in between those who are brought into a privileged life, and those who are not. It’s like the rising water is pressure that is being put onto middle and lower class families to try to catch up to the upper class, trying to give their kids a better future. Secondly, Davis’s family is surrounded by wealth from the paintings they own, the …show more content…
Lastly, when Aza and Daisy receive $50,000 each to keep quiet about what they know about Russell, they spend it in two different ways; Aza puts it into a bank account to grow interest, while Daisy uses it to catch up to Aza (financially) by buying a car, a laptop, and quitting her job at Chuck E Cheese. But, Aza sees this as a irresponsible move on behalf of Daisy, but, Daisy is seeing something that Aza doesn’t; the fact that they come from two different financial …show more content…
Maybe it’s your parents, or maybe your younger sibling, but without power, you dread every day. The characters in this book experience the effect that having power has, and the effect that having no power has. All throughout the book, we see Aza struggling through her OCD, and she just sits back, and lets it take her for a ride through her life, but, she can’t help it. Aza experiencing the lack of power is the first examples of the theme that the amount of power you have affects your life. Aza starts her whole story with no power, so she has been trained almost to how it feels to have no power, and let her OCD make decisions for her. Her losing that thing the is familiar with is like losing your eyes. You have no sense of what is going on, and you are traveling through the dark. No matter how much Aza wants to have the power, she knows that without having someone in charge, she would just crumble. The lack of power through the vast majority of the novel makes Aza dependent on her OCD. But then, we get to the point when Aza does gain the power back. In the hospital room, Aza is caught in between a scene where she is screaming at the voice inside of her, right before she gulps down the hand sanitizer. But after, when she comes face to face with her mother, confronting her about what happens, she makes the decision that everything needs to end. After gaining the power, Aza makes her recovery (a rough
White prosperity through gentrification is evident in that the Valley and the Bottom begin a reversal in inhabitants. More precisely, within the lines “Nobody colored lived much up in the Bottom anymore. White people were building towers for television stations up there and there was a rumor about a golf course” (Morrison,) the African-American community of the bottom was uprooted because of desegregation. Interestingly, the Bottom collapsed under the pressure of money, the space between people and families grew ever immense. Which is evident since Morrison explicitly states that where once theaters, shops, and hotels occupied TV and telephone towers employ these cavities. Where once the community was founded upon the decrepit hills of a "joke" the only voices one can hear is driving a wedge between civilization and love. Interestingly, Morrison implants these towers in an attempt to convey that the economic prosperity that forces the citizens of the Bottom into the valley is every separating the community even after they have gone. At this point in Sula, the reader is introduced to gentrification through wealthy individuals who buy the land and perpetually price the lower-class out of the Bottom and into the Valley. Within this scene, Morrison is interjecting a cycle that was in the past the land was thought to be fruitless and only worthy of African-American toil, now the Valley is establishing an institution of wealthy oppression upon the poor individuals within society.
We saw prejudice and discrimination throughout the book. For example, when Lafayette’s was charged with a crime due to hi, been associated with who did it. When LaJoe lost her benefits from the state due to her on and off husband using her home address and when collecting unemployment benefits which LaJoe did not claim as income coming into the home. In both instances, the Rivers were treated as if they were liars and criminals. Because of Lafayette being from the inner city, there was this predetermine thought about any youth that lived in the inner city from the court system. LaJoe was treated with disrespect by the welfare office because of the prejudgment they had formed about people that lived in the inner city. Due to the location in which they stayed, the importance of healthy living condition was not a priority to the city. They were forced to live in the vicinity of garbage, broken sewer systems, dead animals, etc. Also, the children were forced to either stay in their apartments or play on the railroad tracks because the city had only a few areas for them to play. These areas had become run down and it was unsafe for kids to play in. It is unsure why the was such neglect for those areas of the inner city, but one could only think that it had to do with how this race has been treated for years.
In Ian McEwan’s Atonement class distinction and the strive to ascend the socioeconomic ladder is prevalent. Specifically, the difference between the Tallis’ and the Turners is evident from the start. While the Tallis’ are affluent and live in a mansion, the Turners are relatively poor and can’t afford many of the things that their
The details build an appeal to pathos and impresses upon the reader that this is a problem worth discussing. They are shared in exploited proportions through the excuse called privilege. And knowingly or unknowingly privilege is something that is given to one unknowingly due to the state the modern world is in. Privilege was unfortunately molded over time and to the best of the future the future leaders of the world are working to make things favorable so that the apparent mistakes made in the past won’t follow through into the future. She had also mentioned in her essay that ‘Privilege is relative and contextual. Few people in this world, and particularly in the United States, have no privilege at all. Among those of us who participate in intellectual communities, privilege runs
In the essay “Black and Middle Class”, written by Shelby Steele, Published in “Readers for Writers” book, in 2014, Shelby uses Logos, Pathos, and Ethos to explain how being black and Middle class can have several effect on the black person who is trying to achieve the class ,but have to take his race in the matter.
The rich and privilege versus the poor and unprivileged are the people being compared to one another and recognized throughout both “The Lace-Makers” and “Letter From Birmingham Jail.” Otto-Peters throughout her poem compares the working class women to the rich men that take advantage of the product of their labor (lace), bring awareness to the injustices between the working class and those in power. This comparison is seen in, “You live in luxury and debauchery while they perish,” (line 21) where she is addressing the rich men that mentions earlier and how they do not acknowledge the injustices that happen for them to live in luxury. Similarly in “Letter From Birmingham Jail,” King describes the injustices that occur in society due to the government and law enforcement, “Its ugly record of police brutality is known in every section on this country. Its unjust treatment of Negroes in the courts is a notorious reality,” (81). The social injustices are brought into light for black people (and minorities) going unrecognized because they are seen as lesser than those in power and privileged. Both writers try to bring awareness their injustices, but they focus on their own experiences.
“The Outsiders” is one of the favorite movies of teenagers made by Francis Ford Coppola in 1983. (Barsanti, 2010). “Saints and Roughnecks” is a paper written by William J. Chambliss which was first published in 1978. (Chambliss, n.d.). Both of them commonly point towards one issue i.e. future of individuals in the society is decided by the way they are treated by the materialistic society which tends to favor the richer and suppress the poorer to the extent that the latter are pushed into social exclusion. “The Outsiders” and “Saints and Roughnecks” form part of the vast literature that has preserved the different standards of justice for the rich and the poor, that
We sse this today with the way certain celeberties such as Kanye West dress and how they seemingly are able to wear any "hat" they wish. We look at the rich to be role models simply because of their money and refuse to look at the heart of a person. She hit on the fact that those with little money do all they can to look like something they are not. She talked about the struggle of haveing womens club in the poor neighborhoods as many wouldn't leave a home adress or even attend becase everyone knew they finacial situation but they were going to differnt parts of town to those that didn't to seem like they were a person who were very well off in life. The piece hit om the fact that these chidren were often asked to stop their develepment and work to help the family and for some parenst it was an expectation that the children would care for them. LAstly she talked about war and how it preys on the untutered and poor to fight a battle they knew nothing about. One huge theme of the pieces were that we cannot keep using history and old customs to justify our shortcomings in
In the states, there is an idea of white privilege and unfair advantage. People of white descent are thought to have an advantage before they are even born. They go on their whole lives living “the dream” in the suburbs and never have to worry about unfair treatment or worries of the common world. In some ways this statement in extremely true. This novel makes the reader aware of the real world around them, especially people who have been a part of this dream.
During the women’s movement in the 60s and 70s, although women in general were determined to end male privilege and empower their fellow women, white middleclass women were the only ones having their voices and demands heard, which undoubtedly meant that all other women of color and poor women were either forgotten or ignored. While some may argue that this was simply an unfortunate coincidence, it is certainly not a mistake that those who were heard and privileged were white women with money and those who were routinely ignored were poor women of color. Therefore, because race and class literally and simultaneously determined who were ignored and oppressed and who were heard and privileged, it can be argued that intersectionality is very much present and at play in this example. This idea of oppression and privilege within the context of intersectionality is further reinforced in May’s piece when she explains that, “…intersectionality scholars and activists repeatedly have shown that privilege and oppression are experienced and structured simultaneously: this means that addressing
People with lower income face challenges throughout their life that can determine social interactions with peers. For instance, throughout the story Rosaura is treated differently for being the daughter of a maid, which in turn leads the reader to presume she is of lower economic class. In “A Stolen party” Liliana Hecker uses underlying messages and symbolism to convey a theme that people are discriminated against depending on their economic class. Firstly, Liliana Hecker uses underlying messages by incorporating economic class into social class, making one connect to another and in turn results in discrimination. In “A stolen Party”, Liliana Hecker gives us an unclear visual of what the girl in the bow is trying to imply, she states, "
Black Pickett fences by Mary Pattillo explore the black middle class like no other scholar to this date, she provides qualitative date and quantitative data in her findings. She explains the positive and negative obstacles in life for the black middle class. Black Pickett Fences and Black Wealth White Wealth have a lot of similar information. Both claim that majority of blacks are poor, black middle class face problems that the white middle class don’t, and the black middle class is fragile. Black success is defined by income, but we should measure it by wealth.Equality of opportunity, and equality of achievement, opportunity is you can go to college, achievement bettering the resources at that school so that can be competent. The middle class consist of
There are moments in life that the world seems to be turned upside down and inside out; As if the greatest moments come to the least deserving person, and the passionate and the diligent only get a drop of achievement. These moments can come in waves of frustration, anger, envy - for the struggling - tearing the hard workers to pieces when they see the undeserving take in praise and achievements, but still pushing on towards their dream, these workers don’t bend to the challenges that are thrown in the way. Instead, it only fuels their fire, makes the engines burn and pushes them further; to only have their drudgery mean nothing. Time after time, throughout history, the world had seen this pattern show; in factories, huge companies - especially in politics - but even more so in early twentieth century literature, like The Grapes of Wrath, Elmer Gantry, and Let Us Now Praise Famous Men. In The Great Gatsby, F. Scott Fitzgerald uses the settings of the valley of ashes and Gatsby’s mansion to convey that the American Dream is impossible to achieve due to the greediness of the wealthy.
I agree that being born into privilege means also having greater responsibilities than others because, the individual who has the privilege to do things that others can’t should be taking seriously because if he/she takes advantage or misuses their privileges; someone else could have used their privileges in better ways. As it states in the novel “She said just because your father owns a newspaper and all those factories does not mean you have to feel too big, because her father is rich, too". This reveals that an individual has more responsibilities than others because as someone has privileges others look at them as they have more responsibilities because they are rich. so someone with privileges have the responsibility possessing good qualities
Similarly to the political situations described by the three authors of the provided excerpts, contemporary American citizens are raising questions about the establishments of social dominance and other unaddressed yet pervasive issues. For example, in the first excerpt, the poem “I Run Around with Them,” Chairil Anwar describes his experiences with children of elite groups, from which he develops his opinion regarding the meaninglessness of these children’s lives. Anwar explains that he runs around with them for he has nothing else to do now. He describes changing his outward appearance as well as outlook while tagging along with these elite children.