Chugbb V. Brennan Case Study

4/11 12 PM this worker participated in a meeting with Gina Reno and Christina McAdams. Christina arrive she seemed frantic and worried. Gina asked Christina what was going on. Christina replied that the man who bought the guns from Chad, when he stole from his uncle Bruce, has been found and arrested. The family of the man who was arrested for buying the guns was reported to be looking for Chad. Christina was concerned because now that the man was arrested he can file a motion to investigate and her name is all over the case due to being a "snitch". Christina reported that she took the police to the home that Chad sold the guns to. Gina spoke to Christina about not consistently wearing herself about the family looking for her or would cause her to go crazy. Gina spoke with Christina about employment. Christina reports that she has no employment. Christina reports that she was working at the Olive branch, but quit the day that she informed the worker. Christina reported that she quit working at Olive Branch due to her sis sister reputation. Christina reports that Olive branch was treating her as if she was her sister. Christina was kept in the back and she is a pretty girl who wanted to be a server. She wished to be a server to earn tips. Gina and this worker both explained that she should've kept her job at the the

Matthew Setley, Esquire, 4 Park Plaza 2nd Floor, Wyomissing, Pa. 19610 (610) 898-9500 was advised of the identity of Investigator Sean P. Brennan and of the confidential nature and purpose of the interview, Setley, provided the following information:

Cpl. Jeffrey Johnston Hellertown Police Dept. 685 Main St. Hellertown, Pa. 18055 was advised of the identity of Investigator Sean P. Brennan and of the confidential nature and purpose of the interview, Johnston, provided the following information:

(1) Constitutional Question: Does Article 1, Section 8, The Coefficient Clause, give congress the ability to establish a national bank and does the Maryland law implementing a tax on the Baltimore Branch violate these privileges?

The Halbig vs. Burwell legal case came to the attention of the healthcare field and the Supreme Court because of a question of whether or not the IRS was overstepping its bounds by providing subsidies to people who were purchasing their insurance through the federal exchanges rather than through a state exchange. The legislation specifically addressed giving subsidies to people who purchased through exchanges set up by the state. It did not make provisions for subsidies for people whose state did not develop an exchange, therefore the argument was that the IRS overstepped the law by giving subsidies to people who purchased their insurance through the federal exchanges. The plaintiffs were arguing that it was not lawful for these people to be

In the case of Booth versus Maryland, the case favored victims’ rights over offender rights. According to the Eighth Amendment, the offender's constitutional rights were violated due to the jury being allowed to read the victim impact statement during the sentencing process of the trial. This additional, unrelated information allowed the jury to visualize how the crime impacted the victim's family. In this case, the state had introduced prejudicial and inflammatory documentation which provoked the jury to force unbelievable severe punishment. However, the presenting of the victim's statement during the sentencing process impacted the jury's decision. Under the Eighth Amendment, The Supreme Court decided that states cannot grant juries the opportunity

Kenneth Brewer 9738 Upper Little Creed Rd., Bangor, Pa. 18013 (484) 515-3052 was advised of the identity of Investigator Sean P. Brennan and of the confidential nature and purpose of the interview, Brewer, provided the following information:

Kenneth Stryker 1940 Leithsville Rd, Hellertown, Pa. 18055 (610) 838-1044 was advised of the identity of Investigator Sean P. Brennan and of the confidential nature and purpose of the interview, Stryker, provided the following information:

P/O Timothy Piotrowski Hellertown Police Dept. 685 Main St., Hellertown, Pa., 18055 (610) 330-2200 was advised of the identity of Investigator Sean P. Brennan and of the confidential nature and purpose of the interview, Piotrowski, provided the following information:

Hey guys, I have more information all about the case McCulloch vs.Maryland. Maryland has decided to levy a tax requiring all banks not chartered by Maryland to pay a tax. James McCulloch, cashier of at the Bank of the United States in Baltimore, has refused to pay the tax;Maryland has decided to sue! After losing in state court, he has now brought it to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has now ruled that individual states cannot interfere with operations of the national government, whose laws are supreme.

P/O Charles Harris #216 Chester Police Department 160 E. 7th St. Chester, Pa. 19013 (610) 447-7931 was advised of the identity of Investigator Sean P. Brennan and of the confidential nature and purpose of the interview, Harris, provided the following information:

Based on the scenario, the motion to suppress the tools and diagram should not be granted. Based on the fact that an officer observed a man standing in an alley behind a place of business at 11:50 P.M. for more than 5 minutes, the officer had reasonable suspicion that the man was in the progress of committing a crime. Based on the fact that the officer had established reasonable suspicion, he was legally justified to stop and briefly detain the man (Cornell Law, 2017). The fact that the officer grabbed the subject, swung him around, and pushed him against the wall of the store is irrelevant because the subject is not accusing the officer of excessive force. Terry v. Ohio states that when a police officer has a reasonable suspicion that a suspect is

On July 8, 2015 at approximatley 0700 hours Officer Robles was brought to DW Brewer's office to to be questioned on a prior incident involving inappropriate radio traffic. Before DW Brewer could begin the conversation Robles became willfully insubordinate and disresepectful to her. Robles demanded to know "why" Ms. Brewer was moving him off of the yard, to have the Union involved, and he demanded the Deputy Warden write him up. According to SGT. Reza's written statement Robles became more upset and continued moving around the office aggressively in nature and flinging his arms around. Reza than felt the need to step in between Robles and DW Brewer in an attempt to calm Robles down. Reza escorted Robles out of DW Brewer's office at which Reza

Wally Scott 106 N. 9th St., Reading, Pa. 19601 (484) 335-0585 was advised of the identity of Investigator Sean P. Brennan and of the confidential nature and purpose of the interview, Scott, provided the following information:

Information being linked out of the Police Office. Julie Godzik police dispatcher received a phone call from Carl Rossman for a police officer to deliver a letter to Norm. Mike, Bob Godzik, and Julie Godzik were outside back of Wagner Dining Hall near police station Talking at 8:45. When I was going to meet with Carl Rossman. When I returned from meeting at 9:30 these employees were still there and Lenny talking. In the process Norm Called me from Westmoreland Hall and said he was summons to Carl Rossman Office .None of these employee had talked to Norm yet.Lenny verify he already