Cigarettes And Long Term Health Effects

Tobacco is the number one cause of preventable death in the United States. According to the American Lung Association in 2009, 20.6% of adults were current smokers. In 1970, the United States banned television and radio advertisements of cigarettes. Across the world countries battle similar issues in how to help prevent deaths, lower healthcare costs, and educate the population. Countries have banned advertising, posted health causes, renamed brands, and even included informational fliers in packs of cigarettes. In 2001, The Government of India decided to ban the advertising of cigarettes. This ban was created to help the youth of India and hoped to reduce the amount of future smokers. The proposal of this restriction caused debates between the government, advertising companies, and tobacco manufacturers. The supporting and dismantling arguments for these ethical and commercial causes of the ban have enabled the government to make their final decision.

When you start smoking since the very first time, the chemicals inhaled can have an immediate effect in the body. The smoke contains a chemical called carbon monoxide that transfers to the blood instead of oxygen. As a result, the blood cells suffer from oxygen making harder to breathe especially while exercising. It can also be very harmful to smoke during pregnancy due to the fact that a developing baby can suffer from breathing which can also lead to other dysfunctions in the process of the formation. The smoke of cigarettes contains millions of chemicals that cause serious damage to the tissue of the breathing system. There is clear evidence from scientist who state that tobacco smoke increase the risk of suffering many dangerous and fatal

Although cigarette advertisements were banned from broadcast media, including television and radio in 1971, the tobacco industry still continues to produce ads through other means but under strict restrictions. Cigarette advertising is allowed in business establishments or magazine publications that are strictly for adults over 21 years of age. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced many restrictions in 2010 on the way that tobacco can be advertised. For instance, tobacco companies can no longer sponsor sporting/entertainment events and cannot sell cigarettes in packs fewer than 20, which eliminates the “kiddie packs.” In addition, a regulation for billboard advertising is up for discussion and is being processed (Food and Drug Administration, 2014). However, the laws and strict regulations that have been passed are in conflict with the best interest of the cigarette companies.

Cigarettes are harmful to you as it can cause many health problems in your body. Even though you’re not a smoker, you can still be exposed to the same chemicals as a smoker can. One cigarette provides you with many chemicals that will damage your body, slowly and will cause addiction. The chemicals can cause lung cancer, strokes, heart diseases and many more long-term effects of cigarettes. Although you may not be a smoker, you can still be exposed to the same chemicals as a smoker will. There are many facts that many people don’t know about cigarettes.

The prohibition of tobacco has been trending in foreign nations such as Finland, Norway and France. To conduct similar constraints is the intention of the government of India. Endangerment and possible victims of hazards are the concerns of those who are in favor of banning tobacco as well as other precarious commodities such as handguns and narcotics in India. Millions of deaths around the world have been the aftereffect of tobacco and cigarette smoking since the 90’s. Predictions of an increase of death toll would occur in the latter years to come. Utilization of tobacco among the youth is the product of propagandas’ enticements. Consequently, an increase in medical expenses such as hospital bills and health care expenditures would become the repercussion of such consumption. Additionally, even supposing that the occupation of 26 million people is the liability of tobacco industries, a boycott of tobacco and job turnovers would not create an adverse impact on the economy of India. Investments in other stocks would enhance the Indian economy. Finally, a decline of tobacco consumption would become fruitful if there is a proper implementation of banning tobacco endorsements.

The following statistics gave a solid argument as to why the government of India was on track in banning tobacco advertisement. In 1981, the Supreme Court (of Appeal) in Belgium gave its ruling that a ban on tobacco advertising was not unconstitutional. In 1991 the French Constitutional Council declared that the French ban on advertising tobacco products was not unconstitutional as it was based on the need to protect public health and did not curtail the freedom of trade.

To protect the society the anti smoking law goes further and strongly restricts tobacco advertising moreover link to wellness and health image the cigarette, also provides that 100 % of back of the packaging is occupied by health warning, including real images of the effects of cigarette in human

Cigarette smoking has been around for a very long time but recently became a big problem when James Bonsack invented the cigarette making machine and spread all around the world. Teresa Hood from the U.S. department of health and human services says that “Cigarette smoking is responsible for more than 480,000 deaths per year in the United States, including nearly 42,000 deaths resulting from secondhand smoke exposure. This is about one in five deaths annually, or 1,300 deaths every day” (Hood). This explains why lowering cigarette taxes is important and will lower the number of deaths each

Tobacco has been around for centuries and consumed by people everywhere around the world. The products tobacco companies produce contain harmful chemicals and drugs to make the user stay hooked for as long as possible. Till death do us part, am I right? These companies use the ignorance of under developed countries to leech off of their wallets and create sickness without an explanation. Tobacco should not be able to advertise its products in a positive light.

Smoking tobacco is a health hazard to humans, the smoker and the non smoker alike; hence the government of India stance to discourage smoking through the ban on perceived vehicle used to entice the public to take up smoking. According to WHO smoking accounted to 3 million deaths in 1990 and4, 028 million in1998 in the world and following that trend would lead to 8, 4 million deaths in 2020 and 10 million in 2030.

If all smokers in the United States stopped smoking in 2006, 2.8 million premature deaths would be prevented between then and 2025 (Kliff). Also, the money spent on health would decrease by $211 billion in that same time period (Kliff). The health benefits of smoking bans are unquestionable, but the other aspects of it are arguable. A popular belief is that restaurants who ban smoking will receive a considerably lesser amount of money than restaurants that do not ban smoking because smokers will not go to restaurants that refuse to accommodate their customers. “The results of our naive specifications indicate that smoking bans have a large negative effect on restaurant revenues” (Fleck and Hanssen 61). Another argument that opposes smoking bans is that anybody is free to smoke anywhere and anytime they please, and that the practice of smoking bans will take away a person’s rights. These people believe that if a person smokes, it is their decision and right to do so, regardless of the health consequences (“In Defense of Smokers” 4).

Despite decades of the consumer warnings showcasing unpleasant and early deaths, cigarettes have not been banned or made illegal. The cigarette industry has had numerous claims filed against it over health issues, the prices of the products, the ingredients used, and where the cigarettes are produced. The lives that could be saved every year from a cigarette ban, not to mention the money and revenue that could be generated for the government by this, are more than enough reasons to get on board. Many people want the freedom to make their own choices, but if the choice you make is only a negative choice that will affect you and those around you, something like cigarette sales and consumption, should be banned in America.

the examples of other nations which have deemed it constitutional to place such bans on tobacco advertising. They claim that studies have shown that in these countries the consumption of tobacco products among the younger crowd has dropped. It is also claimed that the ban itself won 't hurt the economy because in reality the revenue the government receives from the tobacco industry does not offset the costs it creates.

the examples of other nations which have deemed it constitutional to place such bans on tobacco advertising. They claim that studies have shown that in these countries the consumption of tobacco products among the younger crowd has dropped. It is also claimed that the ban itself won 't hurt the economy because in reality the revenue the government receives from the tobacco industry does not offset the costs it

The arguments in favor of the government banning tobacco advertising generally begins with the belief that the government has the right to intervene in the best interest of its citizens. The banning of cocaine, which is generally seen as worldwide, is often used as an example of this. Public health is often the motive that is cited when countries such as Belgium and France banned tobacco advertising. It was that “…the French ban on advertising tobacco products was not unconstitutional as it was based on the need to protect public health and did not curtail the freedom of trade.” (ICMR, 2001)