preview

Civil Disobedience

Decent Essays

Depending on what perspective to take on this question, peaceful resistance to laws can have a positive or negative effect as different stakeholders from different perspective viewed peaceful resistance differently. Peaceful protest from the perspective of the protesters engaged in civil disobedience is a peaceful way to bring awareness to the injustices happening in society, while to that of the government and officials, it would seem as disrupting the “peace” in society. On the perspective of a protester, civil obedience to them positively impact a free society because civil disobedience is a way for society to advance forward without the current problems despite being “free”. Civil obedience in a way is a method to solve current issues …show more content…

To be more specific, in the 1960s of the Civil Rights Movements, the law of “separate but equal” is a fair and both White and African Americans have equal stuff, but it is not of the same quality meaning that during that time, White Americans have better quality items such as bathrooms, books, and teachers while African American have lower quality items, but it was “fair”. This, then, led to African American engaged in civil disobedience in order to change their situation as well as to change society to become a society where both White and African Americans coexist together. Thus, there is this ironic situation where protesters are being civil disobedient but it is due to uphold and amend the law for the common good of the nation with a diverse population. Furthermore, protesters engaged in civil disobedience knew of their consequences, which according to the source “7 Arguments Against Civil Disobedience”, shows how the protesters respect the system of the law, but still seeks to change the law for the better knowing the consequences can be dire such as having a criminal record which can be a scarred for life. In the case of the …show more content…

Civil disobedience, fundamentally, is still disobeying the law that upholds order in society and by challenging the law, it is basically committing a crime. Thus, in the perspective of government officials who are responsible in keeping order of society within a nation, civil disobedience is consider as negatively impacting a free society as it incite other people to emerge and protest, which sometimes can be dangerous. Thus, civil disobedience in the government official’s perspective in a way is “a recognition of the constant threat of trained troublemakers and rabble rousers aimed at all times against our entire society.”(Civil Disobedience: a Threat to Our Society). For example, Edward Snowden who leaked confidential information without authorization. He was someone of intelligence and working with confidential information, but he decided to leak important government information which disrupts the free and peaceful society, which his action is considered “against” society as he did not follow the law and engage in civil disobedience. Therefore, in the case of government official perspectives, the act of civil disobedience can be seen as negatively impacting society as it is “against” the societal norms and

Get Access